Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Helgadóttir, A.
Right arrow Articles by Collins, R. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Helgadóttir, A.
Right arrow Articles by Collins, R. P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Helgadóttir, A.
Right arrow Articles by Collins, R. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Botany 88 (Special Issue): 771-780, 2001
© 2001 Annals of Botany Company

Adaptational Changes in White Clover Populations Selected Under Marginal Conditions

Áslaug Helgadóttir 1, Sigrídur Dalmannsdóttir 1, and Rosemary P. Collins 2

1 The Agricultural Research Institute, Keldnaholt, Reykjavík, IS-112, Iceland
2 Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Plas Gogerddan, Aberystwyth, Ceredigion SY23 3EB, Wales, UK

aslaug{at}rala.is

To extend the cultivation of white clover into the marginal areas of northern Europe it is important to identify morphological and physiological characters of adaptive value. These can form the basis of selection criteria for genetic improvement. The objectives of this study were to (1) characterize the morphology of survivor populations of the white clover cultivars AberHerald and Undrom selected under Icelandic conditions; (2) investigate the growth response of selected populations in simulated spring temperatures; and (3) study how these responses affected persistence and production potential of the populations when grown under field conditions in Iceland. Results showed that natural selection had led to morphological changes in the AberHerald survivor populations in the direction of the morphology of plants adapted to the northern, marginal environment. Results obtained under simulated spring temperatures also indicated a selection for genotypes that maintained their leaf production potential. In contrast, selection in Undrom occurred for improved general efficiency and competitive ability rather than for improved survival of the harsh winter climate. The different responses of the two cultivars may partly reflect the fact that AberHerald survivors were selected after only one winter but Undrom survivors were selected after three growing seasons in experimental plots. The observed morphological changes in AberHerald were not sufficient to improve persistence when tested under field conditions. Undrom survivors, on the other hand, suffered less winter damage and showed greater production potential over the following growing season than the original population. Implications of the results for breeding white clover for marginal areas are discussed.

Trifolium repens L., white clover, adaptation, marginal areas, breeding

Submitted on January 10, 2001
Revised on February 21, 2001
Accepted on March 28, 2001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
A. Helgadottir, P. Marum, S. Dalmannsdottir, K. Daugstad, T. A. Kristjansdottir, and T. Lunnan
Combining Winter Hardiness and Forage Yield in White Clover (Trifolium repens) Cultivated in Northern Environments
Ann. Bot., November 1, 2008; 102(5): 825 - 834.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
R. P. COLLINS, A. HELGADOTTIR, M. FOTHERGILL, and I. RHODES
Variation Amongst Survivor Populations of White Clover Collected from Sites Across Europe: Growth Attributes and Physiological Responses to Low Temperature
Ann. Bot., March 1, 2002; 89(3): 283 - 292.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.