Annals of Botany 89: 925-940, 2002
© 2002 Annals of Botany Company
Plant Breeding and Drought in C3 Cereals: What Should We Breed For?
,31Unitat de Fisiologia Vegetal, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Diagonal 645, 08028 Barcelona, Spain, 2Departamento de Producción Vegetal e IFEVA, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Av. San Martín 4453, 1417 Buenos Aires, Argentina, 3International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre (CIMMYT), Mexico and 4Àrea de Conreus Extensius, Centre UdL-IRTA, Alcalde Rovira Roure 177, 25198 Lleida, Spain
* For correspondence. E-mail josel{at}porthos.bio.ub.es Mailing address: Apartado 370, PO Box 60326, Houston, TX 77205, USA
Received: 25 May 2001; Returned for revision: 16 October 2001; Accepted: 12 November 2001.
Drought is the main abiotic constraint on cereal yield. Analysing physiological determinants of yield responses to water may help in breeding for higher yield and stability under drought conditions. The traits to select (either for stress escape, avoidance or tolerance) and the framework where breeding for drought stress is addressed will depend on the level and timing of stress in the targeted area. If the stress is severe, breeding under stress-free conditions may be unsuccessful and traits that confer survival may become a priority. However, selecting for yield itself under stress-alleviated conditions appears to produce superior cultivars, not only for optimum environments, but also for those characterized by frequent mild and moderate stress conditions. This implies that broad avoidance/tolerance to mild–moderate stresses is given by constitutive traits also expressed under stress-free conditions. In this paper, we focus on physiological traits that contribute to improved productivity under mild–moderate drought. Increased crop performance may be achieved through improvements in water use, water-use efficiency and harvest index. The first factor is relevant when soil water remains available at maturity or when deep-rooted genotypes access water in the soil profile that is not normally available; the two latter conditions become more important when all available water is exhausted by the end of the crop cycle. Independent of the mechanism operating, a canopy able to use more water than another would have more open stomata and therefore higher canopy temperature depression, and 13C discrimination (
13C) in plant matter. The same traits would also seem to be relevant when breeding for hot, irrigated environments. Where additional water is not available to the crop, higher water-use efficiency (WUE) appears to be an alternative strategy to improve crop performance. In this context 13C constitutes a simple but reliable measure of WUE. However, in contrast to lines performing better because of increased access to water, lines producing greater biomass due to superior WUE will have lower 13C values. WUE may be modified not only through a decrease in stomatal conductance, but also through an increase in photosynthetic capacity. Harvest index is strongly reduced by terminal drought (i.e. drought during grain filling). Thus, phenological traits increasing the relative amount of water used during grain filling, or adjusting the crop cycle to the seasonal pattern of rainfall may be useful. Augmenting the contribution of carbohydrate reserves accumulated during vegetative growth to grain filling may also be worthwhile in harsh environments. Alternatively, extending the duration of stem elongation without changing the timing of anthesis would increase the number of grains per spike and the harvest index without changing the amount of water utilized by the crop.
Key words: Barley, drought, Hordeum vulgare L., physiological traits, Triticum aestivum L., Triticum turgidum L. var. durum, wheat, yield, stress.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Gutierrez, M. P. Reynolds, W. R. Raun, M. L. Stone, and A. R. Klatt Spectral Water Indices for Assessing Yield in Elite Bread Wheat Genotypes under Well-Irrigated, Water-Stressed, and High-Temperature Conditions Crop Sci., December 30, 2009; 50(1): 197 - 214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Cabrera-Bosquet, C. Sanchez, and J. L. Araus How yield relates to ash content, {Delta}13C and {Delta}18O in maize grown under different water regimes Ann. Bot., November 1, 2009; 104(6): 1207 - 1216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. A. Fish and H. J. Earl Water-Use Efficiency Is Negatively Correlated with Leaf Epidermal Conductance in Cotton (Gossypium spp.) Crop Sci., June 26, 2009; 49(4): 1409 - 1415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Cabrera-Bosquet, G. Molero, S. Nogues, and J. L. Araus Water and nitrogen conditions affect the relationships of {Delta}13C and {Delta}18O to gas exchange and growth in durum wheat J. Exp. Bot., April 1, 2009; 60(6): 1633 - 1644. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Phakamas, A. Patanothai, S. Jogloy, K. Pannangpetch, and G. Hoogenboom Physiological Determinants for Pod Yield of Peanut Lines Crop Sci., November 24, 2008; 48(6): 2351 - 2360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Marzin, R. Mihaly, J. Pauk, and P. Schweizer A transient assay system for the assessment of cell-autonomous gene function in dehydration-stressed barley J. Exp. Bot., September 1, 2008; 59(12): 3359 - 3369. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. S. Nemali and M. W van Iersel Physiological Responses to Different Substrate Water Contents: Screening for High Water-use Efficiency in Bedding Plants J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., May 1, 2008; 133(3): 333 - 340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Royo, V. Martos, A. Ramdani, D. Villegas, Y. Rharrabti, and L. F. Garcia del Moral Changes in Yield and Carbon Isotope Discrimination of Italian and Spanish Durum Wheat during the 20th Century Agron. J., February 26, 2008; 100(2): 352 - 360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Yoshimura, A. Masuda, M. Kuwano, A. Yokota, and K. Akashi Programmed Proteome Response for Drought Avoidance/Tolerance in the Root of a C3 Xerophyte (Wild Watermelon) Under Water Deficits Plant Cell Physiol., February 1, 2008; 49(2): 226 - 241. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Pandey, S. Chakraborty, A. Datta, and N. Chakraborty Proteomics Approach to Identify Dehydration Responsive Nuclear Proteins from Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Mol. Cell. Proteomics, January 1, 2008; 7(1): 88 - 107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Maccaferri, M. C. Sanguineti, S. Corneti, J. L. A. Ortega, M. B. Salem, J. Bort, E. DeAmbrogio, L. F. G. del Moral, A. Demontis, A. El-Ahmed, et al. Quantitative Trait Loci for Grain Yield and Adaptation of Durum Wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) Across a Wide Range of Water Availability Genetics, January 1, 2008; 178(1): 489 - 511. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. P. Reynolds, C. S. Pierre, A. S.I. Saad, M. Vargas, and A. G. Condon Evaluating Potential Genetic Gains in Wheat Associated with Stress-Adaptive Trait Expression in Elite Genetic Resources under Drought and Heat Stress Crop Sci., December 18, 2007; 47(Supplement_3): S-172 - S-189. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Karaba, S. Dixit, R. Greco, A. Aharoni, K. R. Trijatmiko, N. Marsch-Martinez, A. Krishnan, K. N. Nataraja, M. Udayakumar, and A. Pereira Improvement of water use efficiency in rice by expression of HARDY, an Arabidopsis drought and salt tolerance gene PNAS, September 25, 2007; 104(39): 15270 - 15275. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Prasad, B. F. Carver, M. L. Stone, M. A. Babar, W. R. Raun, and A. R. Klatt Potential Use of Spectral Reflectance Indices as a Selection Tool for Grain Yield in Winter Wheat under Great Plains Conditions Crop Sci., July 30, 2007; 47(4): 1426 - 1440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Araus, J. Ferrio, R Buxo, and J Voltas The historical perspective of dryland agriculture: lessons learned from 10 000 years of wheat cultivation J. Exp. Bot., January 1, 2007; 58(2): 131 - 145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Reynolds, F. Dreccer, and R. Trethowan Drought-adaptive traits derived from wheat wild relatives and landraces J. Exp. Bot., January 1, 2007; 58(2): 177 - 186. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Xiong, R.-G. Wang, G. Mao, and J. M. Koczan Identification of Drought Tolerance Determinants by Genetic Analysis of Root Response to Drought Stress and Abscisic Acid Plant Physiology, November 1, 2006; 142(3): 1065 - 1074. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Zhang, M. A. R. Mian, and J. H. Bouton Recent Molecular and Genomic Studies on Stress Tolerance of Forage and Turf Grasses Crop Sci., February 1, 2006; 46(2): 497 - 511. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. M. Impa, S. Nadaradjan, P. Boominathan, G. Shashidhar, H. Bindumadhava, and M. S. Sheshshayee Carbon Isotope Discrimination Accurately Reflects Variability in WUE Measured at a Whole Plant Level in Rice Crop Sci., October 27, 2005; 45(6): 2517 - 2522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. A. Tabanao and R. Bernardo Genetic Variation in Maize Breeding Populations with Different Numbers of Parents Crop Sci., September 23, 2005; 45(6): 2301 - 2306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Tester and A. Bacic Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Grasses. From Model Plants to Crop Plants Plant Physiology, March 1, 2005; 137(3): 791 - 793. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. L. Araus, D. Villegas, N. Aparicio, L. F. G. del Moral, S. El Hani, Y. Rharrabti, J. P. Ferrio, and C. Royo Environmental Factors Determining Carbon Isotope Discrimination and Yield in Durum Wheat under Mediterranean Conditions Crop Sci., January 1, 2003; 43(1): 170 - 180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. A. J. PARRY, P. J. ANDRALOJC, S. KHAN, P. J. LEA, and A. J. KEYS Rubisco Activity: Effects of Drought Stress Ann. Bot., June 15, 2002; 89(7): 833 - 839. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|