AOBPreview originally published online on September 4, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Annals of Botany 90: 437-443, 2002
© 2002 Annals of Botany Company
A Simulation Study on the Importance of Size-related Changes in Leaf Morphology and Physiology for Carbon Gain in an Epiphytic Bromeliad
1 Institute of Botany, University of Basel, Switzerland, 2 Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Panama, 3 Lehrstuhl für Botanik II der Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany and 4 Centro de Ciencias Medioambientales, CSIC, Serrano 115, E-28006 Madrid, Spain
* For correspondence. Botanisches Institut der Universität Basel, Schönbeinstrasse 6, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland. Fax +41 (0) 61 267 35 04, e-mail Gerhard.zotz{at}unibas.ch
Received: 15 March 2002; Returned for revision: 3 June 2002; Accepted: 18 June 2002 Published electronically: 4 September 2002
This study addresses the question of how size-related changes in leaf morphology and physiology influence light absorption and carbon gain of the epiphytic bromeliad Vriesea sanguinolenta. A geometrically based computer model, Y-plant, was used for the three-dimensional reconstruction of entire plants and for calculation of whole plant light interception and carbon gain. Plants of different sizes were reconstructed, and morphological and physiological attributes of young and old leaves, and small and large plants were combined to examine the individual effects of each factor on light absorption and carbon gain of the plant. The influence of phyllotaxis on light absorption was also explored. Departure of measured divergence angles between successive leaves from the ideal 137·5° slightly decreased light absorption. The only morphological parameter that consistently changed with plant size was leaf shape: larger plants produced more slender foliage, which substantially reduced self-shading. Nevertheless, self-shading increased with plant size. While the maximum rate of net CO2 uptake of leaves increased linearly with plant size by a factor of two from the smallest to the largest individual, the potential plant carbon gain (based on total foliage area) showed a curvilinear relationship, but with similar numerical variation. We conclude that leaf physiology has a greater impact on plant carbon gain than leaf and plant morphology in this epiphytic bromeliad.
Key words: Crown architecture, ecophysiology, epiphytes, light capture, modelling, photosynthesis, plant size, scaling, Vriesea sanguinolenta.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Onate and S. Munne-Bosch Influence of plant maturity, shoot reproduction and sex on vegetative growth in the dioecious plant Urtica dioica Ann. Bot., October 1, 2009; 104(5): 945 - 956. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. ZOTZ and A. RICHTER Changes in Carbohydrate and Nutrient Contents Throughout a Reproductive Cycle Indicate that Phosphorus is a Limiting Nutrient in the Epiphytic Bromeliad, Werauhia sanguinolenta Ann. Bot., May 1, 2006; 97(5): 745 - 754. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|