Skip Navigation


AOBPreview originally published online on February 20, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Content Snapshot
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
91/5/547    most recent
mcg057v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (68)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BENNETT, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by JOHNSTON, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BENNETT, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by JOHNSTON, J. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by BENNETT, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by JOHNSTON, J. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Botany 91: 547-557, 2003
© 2003 Annals of Botany Company

Comparisons with Caenorhabditis (~100 Mb) and Drosophila (~175 Mb) Using Flow Cytometry Show Genome Size in Arabidopsis to be ~157 Mb and thus ~25 % Larger than the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative Estimate of ~125 Mb

MICHAEL D. BENNETT1, ILIA J. LEITCH1, H. JAMES PRICE2 and J. SPENCER JOHNSTON3

1 Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3DS, UK, 2 Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-2474, USA and 3 Department of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-2474, USA

* For correspondence. Fax +44 (0)20 8332 5320, e-mail m.bennett{at}rbgkew.org.uk

Received: 29 November 2002; Returned for revision: 23 December 2002; Accepted 2 January 2003    Published electronically: 20 February 2003

Recent genome sequencing papers have given genome sizes of 180 Mb for Drosophila melanogaster Iso-1 and 125 Mb for Arabidopsis thaliana Columbia. The former agrees with early cytochemical estimates, but numerous cytometric estimates of around 170 Mb imply that a genome size of 125 Mb for arabidopsis is an underestimate. In this study, nuclei of species pairs were compared directly using flow cytometry. Co-run Columbia and Iso-1 female gave a 2C peak for arabidopsis only approx. 15 % below that for drosophila, and 16C endopolyploid Columbia nuclei had approx. 15 % more DNA than 2C chicken nuclei (with >2280 Mb). Caenorhabditis elegans Bristol N2 (genome size approx. 100 Mb) co-run with Columbia or Iso-1 gave a 2C peak for drosophila approx. 75 % above that for 2C C. elegans, and a 2C peak for arabidopsis approx. 57 % above that for C. elegans. This confirms that 1C in drosophila is approx. 175 Mb and, combined with other evidence, leads us to conclude that the genome size of arabidopsis is not approx. 125 Mb, but probably approx. 157 Mb. It is likely that the discrepancy represents extra repeated sequences in unsequenced gaps in heterochromatic regions. Complete sequencing of the arabidopsis genome until no gaps remain at telomeres, nucleolar organizing regions or centromeres is still needed to provide the first precise angiosperm C-value as a benchmark calibration standard for plant genomes, and to ensure that no genes have been missed in arabidopsis, especially in centromeric regions, which are clearly larger than once imagined.

Key words: DNA C-value, flow cytometry, genome size, Arabidopsis thaliana, Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila melanogaster.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
J. Greilhuber
Cytochemistry and C-values: The Less-well-known World of Nuclear DNA Amounts
Ann. Bot., April 1, 2008; 101(6): 791 - 804.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
M. D. Bennett, H. J. Price, and J. S. Johnston
Anthocyanin Inhibits Propidium Iodide DNA Fluorescence in Euphorbia pulcherrima: Implications for Genome Size Variation and Flow Cytometry
Ann. Bot., April 1, 2008; 101(6): 777 - 790.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
G. Bosco, P. Campbell, J. T. Leiva-Neto, and T. A. Markow
Analysis of Drosophila Species Genome Size and Satellite DNA Content Reveals Significant Differences Among Strains as Well as Between Species
Genetics, November 1, 2007; 177(3): 1277 - 1290.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
M. A. Lysak, K. Cheung, M. Kitschke, and P. Bures
Ancestral Chromosomal Blocks Are Triplicated in Brassiceae Species with Varying Chromosome Number and Genome Size
Plant Physiology, October 1, 2007; 145(2): 402 - 410.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
E. Kamau, B. Charlesworth, and D. Charlesworth
Linkage Disequilibrium and Recombination Rate Estimates in the Self-Incompatibility Region of Arabidopsis lyrata
Genetics, August 1, 2007; 176(4): 2357 - 2369.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
C. Vitte and J. L. Bennetzen
Eukaryotic Transposable Elements and Genome Evolution Special Feature: Analysis of retrotransposon structural diversity uncovers properties and propensities in angiosperm genome evolution
PNAS, November 21, 2006; 103(47): 17638 - 17643.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome Res.Home page
R. Bruggmann, A. K. Bharti, H. Gundlach, J. Lai, S. Young, A. C. Pontaroli, F. Wei, G. Haberer, G. Fuks, C. Du, et al.
Uneven chromosome contraction and expansion in the maize genome
Genome Res., October 1, 2006; 16(10): 1241 - 1251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
K. Y. Lim, K. Souckova-Skalicka, V. Sarasan, J. J. Clarkson, M. W. Chase, A. Kovarik, and A. R. Leitch
A genetic appraisal of a new synthetic Nicotiana tabacum (Solanaceae) and the Kostoff synthetic tobacco
Am. J. Botany, June 1, 2006; 93(6): 875 - 883.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome Res.Home page
L. Cui, P. K. Wall, J. H. Leebens-Mack, B. G. Lindsay, D. E. Soltis, J. J. Doyle, P. S. Soltis, J. E. Carlson, K. Arumuganathan, A. Barakat, et al.
Widespread genome duplications throughout the history of flowering plants
Genome Res., June 1, 2006; 16(6): 738 - 749.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GENES CELLSHome page
S. Inagaki, K. Numata, T. Kondo, M. Tomita, K. Yasuda, A. Kanai, and Y. Kageyama
Identification and expression analysis of putative mRNA-like non-coding RNA in Drosophila
Genes Cells, December 1, 2005; 10(12): 1163 - 1173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
C. D. Jiggins, J. Mavarez, M. Beltran, W. O. McMillan, J. S. Johnston, and E. Bermingham
A Genetic Linkage Map of the Mimetic Butterfly Heliconius melpomene
Genetics, October 1, 2005; 171(2): 557 - 570.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
M. D. BENNETT and I. J. LEITCH
Plant Genome Size Research: A Field In Focus
Ann. Bot., January 1, 2005; 95(1): 1 - 6.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
M. D. BENNETT and I. J. LEITCH
Nuclear DNA Amounts in Angiosperms: Progress, Problems and Prospects
Ann. Bot., January 1, 2005; 95(1): 45 - 90.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
J. GREILHUBER
Intraspecific Variation in Genome Size in Angiosperms: Identifying its Existence
Ann. Bot., January 1, 2005; 95(1): 91 - 98.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
J. DOLEZEL and J. BARTOS
Plant DNA Flow Cytometry and Estimation of Nuclear Genome Size
Ann. Bot., January 1, 2005; 95(1): 99 - 110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
T. R. GREGORY
The C-value Enigma in Plants and Animals: A Review of Parallels and an Appeal for Partnership
Ann. Bot., January 1, 2005; 95(1): 133 - 146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
H. J. PRICE, S. L. DILLON, G. HODNETT, W. L. ROONEY, L. ROSS, and J. S. JOHNSTON
Genome Evolution in the Genus Sorghum (Poaceae)
Ann. Bot., January 1, 2005; 95(1): 219 - 227.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
M. F. FAY, R. S. COWAN, and I. J. LEITCH
The Effects of Nuclear DNA Content (C-value) on the Quality and Utility of AFLP Fingerprints
Ann. Bot., January 1, 2005; 95(1): 237 - 246.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
J. GREILHUBER, J. DOLEZEL, M. A. LYSAK, and M. D. BENNETT
The Origin, Evolution and Proposed Stabilization of the Terms 'Genome Size' and 'C-Value' to Describe Nuclear DNA Contents
Ann. Bot., January 1, 2005; 95(1): 255 - 260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DNA ResHome page
S. Sato, S. Isobe, E. Asamizu, N. Ohmido, R. Kataoka, Y. Nakamura, T. Kaneko, N. Sakurai, K. Okumura, I. Klimenko, et al.
Comprehensive Structural Analysis of the Genome of Red Clover (Trifolium pratense L.)
DNA Res, January 1, 2005; 12(5): 301 - 364.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
D. Zhang, D. W. Choi, S. Wanamaker, R. D. Fenton, A. Chin, M. Malatrasi, Y. Turuspekov, H. Walia, E. D. Akhunov, P. Kianian, et al.
Construction and Evaluation of cDNA Libraries for Large-Scale Expressed Sequence Tag Sequencing in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)
Genetics, October 1, 2004; 168(2): 595 - 608.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome Res.Home page
C. Ren, M.-K. Lee, B. Yan, K. Ding, B. Cox, M. N. Romanov, J. A. Price, J. B. Dodgson, and H.-B. Zhang
A BAC-Based Physical Map of the Chicken Genome
Genome Res., December 1, 2003; 13(12): 2754 - 2758.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.