AOBPreview originally published online on April 3, 2003
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Annals of Botany 91: 795-805, 2003
© 2003 Annals of Botany Company
Size-Dependent Growth and the Development Of Inequality in Maize, Sunflower and Soybean
1 Facultad de Agronomía, UBA, Av. San Martín 4453, Buenos Aires, Argentina and 2 CSIRO Land & Water, Waite Campus, PMB 2 Glen Osmond 5065, Australia
* For correspondence. E-mail clavega{at}mdp.edu.ar
Received: 15 October 2002; Returned for revision 19 December 2002; Accepted 4 February 2003 Published electronically: 3 April 2003
Links were investigated between allometry of plant growth and dynamics of size structure of well-fertilized, irrigated crops of soybean (Glycine max L.), sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) and maize (Zea mays L.) grown at standard plant-population densities (D), as in commercial crops (D = 30, 6 and 8·5 plants m2, respectively), and at high densities (2D). Patterns of size-dependent growth of shoot and seed mass accumulation were distinctly different among species. In soybean and sunflower, non-linear relationships between size and subsequent growth led to strong hierarchical populations in terms of both shoot and seed biomass. Curvilinear (soybean) and sigmoid (sunflower) size-dependent growth determined strongly asymmetrical (soybean) and bimodal (sunflower) frequency distributions of shoot biomass indicating predominantly size asymmetrical competition among individuals. In comparison, a lower plant-to-plant variation coupled with a typical linear allometry of growth to plant size indicated symmetrical two-sided plant interference in maize. Despite the weak development of hierarchies in shoot biomass, a strong inequality in reproductive output developed in crowded populations of maize indicating an apparent breakage of reproductive allometry.
Key words: Helianthus annuus L., Zea maize L., Glycine max L. Merrill, size inequality, reproductive allometry, bimodality, mode of competition, asymmetry, barrenness, growth functions.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. L. Martin, P. J. Hodgen, K. W. Freeman, R. Melchiori, D. B. Arnall, R. K. Teal, R. W. Mullen, K. Desta, S. B. Phillips, J. B. Solie, et al. Plant-to-Plant Variability in Corn Production Agron. J., November 17, 2005; 97(6): 1603 - 1611. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. H. Andrade and P. E. Abbate Response of Maize and Soybean to Variability in Stand Uniformity Agron. J., July 13, 2005; 97(4): 1263 - 1269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
