Skip Navigation


AOBPreview originally published online on May 21, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Content Snapshot
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
92/1/89    most recent
mcg118v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ZHA, T. S.
Right arrow Articles by WANG, K-Y
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by ZHA, T. S.
Right arrow Articles by WANG, K-Y
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by ZHA, T. S.
Right arrow Articles by WANG, K-Y
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Botany 92: 89-96, 2003
© 2003 Annals of Botany Company

Seasonal Variation in Respiration of 1-year-old Shoots of Scots Pine Exposed to Elevated Carbon Dioxide and Temperature for 4 Years

T. S. ZHA*,1, S. KELLOMÄKI1 and K-Y WANG2

1 Faculty of Forestry, University of Joensuu, PO Box 111, FIN-80101 Joensuu, Finland and 2 Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, PO Box 416, 610041 Chengdu, P.R.China

* For correspondence. Fax +358 13 251 4444, e-mail tianshan.zha{at}forest.joensuu.fi

Received: 29 November 2002; Returned for revision: 12 February 2003; Accepted: 8 April 2003    Published electronically: 21 May 2003

Sixteen 20-year-old Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) trees growing in the field were enclosed for 4 years in environment-controlled chambers that maintained: (1) ambient conditions (CON); (2) elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration (ambient + 350 µmol mol–1; EC); (3) elevated temperature (ambient +2–6 °C; ET); or (4) elevated CO2 and elevated temperature (ECT). The dark respiration rates of 1-year-old shoots, from which needles had been partly removed, were measured over the growing season in the fourth year. In all treatments, the temperature coefficient of respiration, Q10, changed with season, being smaller during the growing season than at other times. Respiration rate varied diurnally and seasonally with temperature, being highest around mid-summer and declining gradually thereafter. When measurements were made at the temperature of the chamber, respiration rates were reduced by the EC treatment relative to CON, but were increased by ET and ECT treatments. However, respiration rates at a reference temperature of 15 °C were reduced by ET and ECT treatments, reflecting a decreased capacity for respiration at warmer temperatures (negative acclimation). The interaction between season and treatment was not significant. Growth respiration did not differ between treatments, but maintenance respiration did, and the differences in mean daily respiration rate between the treatments were attributable to the maintenance component. We conclude that maintenance respiration should be considered when modelling respiratory responses to elevated CO2 and elevated temperature, and that increased atmospheric temperature is more important than increasing CO2 when assessing the carbon budget of pine forests under conditions of climate change.

Key words: Scots pine, Pinus sylvestris L., elevated CO2, elevated temperature, shoot respiration.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
T. ZHA, S. KELLOMAKI, K.-Y. WANG, A. RYYPPO, and S. NIINISTO
Seasonal and Annual Stem Respiration of Scots Pine Trees under Boreal Conditions
Ann. Bot., December 1, 2004; 94(6): 889 - 896.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.