Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Content Snapshot
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by COLLINS, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by PUZIO, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by COLLINS, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by PUZIO, S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by COLLINS, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by PUZIO, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Botany 92: 247-258, 2003
© 2003 Annals of Botany Company

Morphological Compatibility of White Clover and Perennial Ryegrass Cultivars Grown under Two Nitrate Levels in Flowing Solution Culture

R. P. COLLINS*,1, M. FOTHERGILL1, J. H. MACDUFF1 and S. PUZIO2

1 Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research (IGER), Plas Gogerddan, Aberystwyth, Ceredigion SY23 3EB, UK 2 Institute of Crop Science and Plant Breeding, Department of Grass and Forage Science, University of Kiel, Holzkoppelweg 2, 24118 Kiel, Germany

* For correspondence. Fax +44 (0)1970 828357, e-mail rosemary.collins{at}bbsrc.ac.uk

Received: 4 April 2003; Accepted: 24 April 2003

The effects of nitrate (NO3) supply on shoot morphology, vertical distribution of shoot and root biomass and total nitrogen (N) acquisition by two perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) cultivars (AberElan and Preference) and two white clover (Trifolium repens L.) cultivars (Grasslands Huia and AberHerald) were studied in flowing nutrient culture. Cultivars were grown from seed as monocultures and the clovers inoculated with Rhizobium. The 6-week measurement period began on day 34 (grasses) and day 56 (clovers) when the NO3 supply was adjusted to either 2 mmol m–3 (low nitrogen, LN) or 50 mmol m–3 (high nitrogen, HN). These treatments were subsequently maintained automatically. Plants were harvested at intervals to measure their morphology and N content. Cultivars of both species differed significantly in several aspects of their response to NO3 supply. In the grasses, the LN treatment increased the root : shoot ratio of AberElan but did not affect the distribution of root length in the root profile. In contrast, this treatment changed the root distribution of Preference compared with HN, resulting in a larger proportion of root length being distributed further down the root profile. The morphology of white clover Grasslands Huia was for the most part unaffected by the level of NO3 supply. In contrast, AberHerald exhibited different growth strategies, with LN plants increasing their stolon weight per unit length at the expense of leaf production, leaf area and stolon length, whereas HN plants showed reduced stolon thickness, greater leaf area production and stolon length per plant. Cultivars with different morphological/physiological strategies in response to NO3 supply may be of value in the construction of ‘compatible mixtures’ aimed at reducing oscillations in sward clover content by extending the range of conditions that allow balanced coexistence of species to occur.

Key words: Lolium perenne L., perennial ryegrass, Trifolium repens L., white clover, nitrate supply, morphology, compatibility.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.