AOBPreview originally published online on July 9, 2003
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Annals of Botany 92: 415-424, 2003
© 2003 Annals of Botany Company
Do Genetic Make-up and Growth Manipulation Affect Tomato Fruit Size by Cell Number, or Cell Size and DNA Endoreduplication?
1 Unité Plantes et Systèmes de culture Horticoles, INRA, Site Agroparc, F-84914 Avignon Cedex 9, France, 2 Physiologie et Biotechnologie végétales, Institut de Biologie Végétale Moléculaire, Centre INRA de Bordeaux, 71 avenue Edouard Bourleaux, BP 81, 33883 Villenave d’Ornon Cedex, France and 3 Unité de Génétique et Amélioration des Fruits et Légumes, INRA, Domaine Saint-Maurice, BP 94, F-84143 Montfavet Cedex, France
* For correspondence. Fax +33-(0)4-32-72-22-82, e-mail nadia.bertin{at}avignon.inra.fr
Received 14 March 2003; Returned for revision: 30 April 2003; Accepted: 17 May 2003 Published electronically: 9 July 2003
This work investigated the link between genetic and developmental controls of fruit size and composition. On two isogenic lines (CF12-C and CF14-L), differing by fruit weight and sugar content quantitative trait loci (QTLs) identified previously, basal and tip fruits were characterized at anthesis and at maturity through their growth, dry matter and sugar content, number and size of cells and nuclei DNA content. The influence of competition was assessed by removing either basal or tip ovaries at anthesis. On an intact inflorescence, CF12-C fruits grew less than CF14-L fruits, with 1·67 fewer cell layers and similar cell size, suggesting that genes controlling cell division may be responsible for this fruit size variation. Truss thinning masked the QTL effect on fruit size, mainly by reducing the difference in cell number between the two lines and by promoting cell expansion in tip fruits, so that fruit growth was similar at both positions and for both lines. Thus, in these lines, cell number exerts a control on final fruit size only when there is competition among fruits. Different responses of basal and tip fruits after flower removal suggested that this treatment induced changes in hormonal relationships within the truss. No fixed relationship between DNA endoreduplication and cell size was found, as while cell size and dry matter and sugar contents differed with tomato lines, fruit position and truss size, endoreduplication patterns were the same. CF12-C fruits had a higher dry matter (+0·3 % of fresh weight) and carbohydrates (+8 % of dry matter) content than CF14-L fruits. The percentage dry matter was independent of truss size but decreased slightly from basal to tip fruits.
Key words: Carbohydrate, cell division, cell size, endoreduplication, fruit size, Lycopersicon esculentum, quality, tomato.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  D. Legland, F. Guillon, K. Kieu, B. Bouchet, and M.-F. Devaux Stereological estimation of cell wall density of DR12 tomato mutant using three-dimensional confocal imaging Ann. Bot., February 1, 2010; 105(2): 265 - 276. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. Bertin, M. Causse, B. Brunel, D. Tricon, and M. Genard Identification of growth processes involved in QTLs for tomato fruit size and composition J. Exp. Bot., January 1, 2009; 60(1): 237 - 248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Weijschede, K. Antonise, H. de Caluwe, H. de Kroon, and H. Huber Effects of cell number and cell size on petiole length variation in a stoloniferous herb Am. J. Botany, January 1, 2008; 95(1): 41 - 49. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H.-F. Liu, M. Genard, S. Guichard, and N. Bertin Model-assisted analysis of tomato fruit growth in relation to carbon and water fluxes J. Exp. Bot., October 1, 2007; 58(13): 3567 - 3580. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Bertin, A. Lecomte, B. Brunel, S. Fishman, and M. Genard A model describing cell polyploidization in tissues of growing fruit as related to cessation of cell proliferation J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2007; 58(7): 1903 - 1913. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Faurobert, C. Mihr, N. Bertin, T. Pawlowski, L. Negroni, N. Sommerer, and M. Causse Major Proteome Variations Associated with Cherry Tomato Pericarp Development and Ripening Plant Physiology, March 1, 2007; 143(3): 1327 - 1346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Fernandez, C. Romieu, A. Moing, A. Bouquet, M. Maucourt, M. R. Thomas, and L. Torregrosa The Grapevine fleshless berry Mutation. A Unique Genotype to Investigate Differences between Fleshy and Nonfleshy Fruit Plant Physiology, February 1, 2006; 140(2): 537 - 547. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Cheniclet, W. Y. Rong, M. Causse, N. Frangne, L. Bolling, J.-P. Carde, and J.-P. Renaudin Cell Expansion and Endoreduplication Show a Large Genetic Variability in Pericarp and Contribute Strongly to Tomato Fruit Growth Plant Physiology, December 1, 2005; 139(4): 1984 - 1994. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. BERTIN Analysis of the Tomato Fruit Growth Response to Temperature and Plant Fruit Load in Relation to Cell Division, Cell Expansion and DNA Endoreduplication Ann. Bot., February 1, 2005; 95(3): 439 - 447. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|