Skip Navigation


AOBPreview originally published online on February 23, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
93/4/455    most recent
mch054v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (18)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ALMÉRAS, T.
Right arrow Articles by SALLES, J.-C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by ALMÉRAS, T.
Right arrow Articles by SALLES, J.-C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by ALMÉRAS, T.
Right arrow Articles by SALLES, J.-C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Botany 93: 455-468, 2004
© 2004 Annals of Botany Company

Identification of Biomechanical Factors Involved in Stem Shape Variability between Apricot Tree Varieties

TANCREDE ALMÉRAS*,1, EVELYNE COSTES1 and JEAN-CLAUDE SALLES1

1 UMR 1098 Biologie du développement des Espèces Pérennes Cultivées, INRA-ENSAM-IRD-CIRAD, Equipe ‘Architecture et Fonctionnement des Espèces Fruitières’, 2 Place Viala, 34060 Montpellier Cedex 1, France

* For correspondence. E-mail t_almeras{at}hotmail.com

Received: 31 July 2003; Returned for revision: 3 November 2003; Accepted: 3 December 2003; Published electronically: 23 February 2004

Background and Aims Stem shape in angiosperms depends on several growth traits such as elongation direction, amount and position of axillary loads, stem dimensions, wood elasticity, radial growth dynamics and active re-orientation due to tension wood. This paper analyses the relationship between these biomechanical factors and stem shape variability.

Methods Three apricot tree varieties with contrasting stem shape were studied. Growth and bending dynamics, mechanical properties and amount of tension wood were measured on 40 1-year-old stems of each variety during one growth season. Formulae derived from simple biomechanical models are proposed to quantify the relationship between biomechanical factors and re-orientation of the stems. The effect of biomechanical factors is quantified combining their mechanical sensitivity and their actual variability.

Key results Re-orientations happened in three main periods, involving distinct biomechanical phenomena: (a) passive bending due to the increase of shoot and fruit load at the start of the season; (b) passive uprighting at the fall of fruits; (c) active uprighting due tension wood production at the end of the season. Differences between varieties mainly happened during periods (a) and (b).

Conclusions The main factors causing differences between varieties are the length/diameter and the load/cross-sectional area ratios during period (a). Wood elasticity does not play an important role because of its low inter-variety variability. Differences during period (b) are related to the dynamics of radial growth: varieties with early radial growth bend weakly upward because the new wood layers tend to set them in a bent position. The action of tension wood during period (c) is low when compared with passive phenomena involved in periods (a) and (b).

Key words: Biomechanics, modelling, tree architecture, stem shape, growth dynamics, re-orientation, Prunus armeniaca.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
B. Moulia and M. Fournier
The power and control of gravitropic movements in plants: a biomechanical and systems biology view
J. Exp. Bot., February 1, 2009; 60(2): 461 - 486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tree PhysiolHome page
L. Martin, N. Leblanc-Fournier, W. Azri, C. Lenne, C. Henry, C. Coutand, and J.-L. Julien
Characterization and expression analysis under bending and other abiotic factors of PtaZFP2, a poplar gene encoding a Cys2/His2 zinc finger protein
Tree Physiol, January 1, 2009; 29(1): 125 - 136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
G. Jaouen, T. Almeras, C. Coutand, and M. Fournier
How to determine sapling buckling risk with only a few measurements
Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2007; 94(10): 1583 - 1593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
H.-Hee. Han, C. Coutand, H. Cochard, C. Trottier, and P.-E. Lauri
Effects of shoot bending on lateral fate and hydraulics: invariant and changing traits across five apple genotypes
J. Exp. Bot., October 1, 2007; 58(13): 3537 - 3547.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
G. Louarn, Y. Guedon, J. Lecoeur, and E. Lebon
Quantitative Analysis of the Phenotypic Variability of Shoot Architecture in Two Grapevine (Vitis vinifera) Cultivars
Ann. Bot., March 1, 2007; 99(3): 425 - 437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
F. W. Telewski
A unified hypothesis of mechanoperception in plants
Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2006; 93(10): 1466 - 1476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.