Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (43)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LÜTTGE, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by LÜTTGE, U.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by LÜTTGE, U.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Botany 93: 629-652, 2004
© 2004 Annals of Botany Company

Ecophysiology of Crassulacean Acid Metabolism (CAM)

ULRICH LÜTTGE*,1

1 Institute of Botany, Technical University of Darmstadt, Schnittspahnstrasse 3–5, D-64287 Darmstadt, Germany

*For correspondence. E-mail: luettge{at}bio.tu-darmstadt.de

Received: 3 October 2003; Returned for revision: 17 December 2003; Accepted: 20 January 2004

Background and Scope Crassulacean Acid Metabolism (CAM) as an ecophysiological modification of photosynthetic carbon acquisition has been reviewed extensively before. Cell biology, enzymology and the flow of carbon along various pathways and through various cellular compartments have been well documented and discussed. The present attempt at reviewing CAM once again tries to use a different approach, considering a wide range of inputs, receivers and outputs.

Input Input is given by a network of environmental parameters. Six major ones, CO2, H2O, light, temperature, nutrients and salinity, are considered in detail, which allows discussion of the effects of these factors, and combinations thereof, at the individual plant level (‘physiological aut-ecology’).

Receivers Receivers of the environmental cues are the plant types genotypes and phenotypes, the latter including morphotypes and physiotypes. CAM genotypes largely remain ‘black boxes’, and research endeavours of genomics, producing mutants and following molecular phylogeny, are just beginning. There is no special development of CAM morphotypes except for a strong tendency for leaf or stem succulence with large cells with big vacuoles and often, but not always, special water storage tissues. Various CAM physiotypes with differing degrees of CAM expression are well characterized.

Output Output is the shaping of habitats, ecosystems and communities by CAM. A number of systems are briefly surveyed, namely aquatic systems, deserts, salinas, savannas, restingas, various types of forests, inselbergs and paramós.

Conclusions While quantitative census data for CAM diversity and biomass are largely missing, intuition suggests that the larger CAM domains are those systems which are governed by a network of interacting stress factors requiring versatile responses and not systems where a single stress factor strongly prevails. CAM is noted to be a strategy for variable, flexible and plastic niche occupation rather than lush productivity. ‘Physiological syn-ecology’ reveals that phenotypic plasticity constitutes the ecophysiological advantage of CAM.

Key words: CAM, ecophysiology.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
J. Ceusters, A. M. Borland, N. Ceusters, V. Verdoodt, C. Godts, and M. P. De Proft
Seasonal influences on carbohydrate metabolism in the CAM bromeliad Aechmea 'Maya': consequences for carbohydrate partitioning and growth
Ann. Bot., February 1, 2010; 105(2): 301 - 309.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
K. Silvera, L. S. Santiago, J. C. Cushman, and K. Winter
Crassulacean Acid Metabolism and Epiphytism Linked to Adaptive Radiations in the Orchidaceae
Plant Physiology, April 1, 2009; 149(4): 1838 - 1847.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
P.-A. Christin, N. Salamin, A. M. Muasya, E. H. Roalson, F. Russier, and G. Besnard
Evolutionary Switch and Genetic Convergence on rbcL following the Evolution of C4 Photosynthesis
Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2008; 25(11): 2361 - 2368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
J. Ceusters, A. M. Borland, E. Londers, V. Verdoodt, C. Godts, and M. P. De Proft
Diel Shifts in Carboxylation Pathway and Metabolite Dynamics in the CAM Bromeliad Aechmea 'Maya' in Response to Elevated CO2
Ann. Bot., September 1, 2008; 102(3): 389 - 397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
B. Osmond, T. Neales, and G. Stange
Curiosity and context revisited: crassulacean acid metabolism in the Anthropocene
J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2008; 59(7): 1489 - 1502.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
O. Hernandez-Gonzalez and O. B. Villarreal
Crassulacean acid metabolism photosynthesis in columnar cactus seedlings during ontogeny: the effect of light on nocturnal acidity accumulation and chlorophyll fluorescence
Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2007; 94(8): 1344 - 1351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
K. Winter and J. A.M. Holtum
Environment or Development? Lifetime Net CO2 Exchange and Control of the Expression of Crassulacean Acid Metabolism in Mesembryanthemum crystallinum
Plant Physiology, January 1, 2007; 143(1): 98 - 107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.