Skip Navigation


AOBPreview originally published online on September 8, 2004
Annals of Botany 2004 94(5):675-689; doi:10.1093/aob/mch193
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Content Select
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/5/675    most recent
mch193v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McLAUGHLIN, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by BOYER, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McLAUGHLIN, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by BOYER, J. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by McLAUGHLIN, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by BOYER, J. S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Annals of Botany 94/5, © Annals of Botany Company 2004; all rights reserved

Sugar-responsive Gene Expression, Invertase Activity, and Senescence in Aborting Maize Ovaries at Low Water Potentials

JOHN E. McLAUGHLIN and JOHN S. BOYER*

College of Marine Studies and College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Delaware, 700 Pilottown Road, Lewes, DE 19958, USA

* For correspondence. E-mail boyer{at}cms.udel.edu

Received: 30 April 2004    Returned for revision: 16 June 2004    Accepted: 22 July 2004    Published electronically: 8 September 2004

• Background and Aims Ovary abortion can occur in maize (Zea mays) if water deficits lower the water potential ({psi}w) sufficiently to inhibit photosynthesis around the time of pollination. The abortion decreases kernel number. The present work explored the activity of ovary acid invertases and their genes, together with other genes for sucrose-processing enzymes, when this kind of abortion occurred. Cytological evidence suggested that senescence may have been initiated after 2 or 3 d of low {psi}w, and the expression of some likely senescence genes was also determined.

• Methods Ovary abortion was assessed at kernel maturity. Acid invertase activities were localized in vivo and in situ. Time courses for mRNA abundance were measured with real time PCR. Sucrose was fed to the stems to vary the sugar flux.

• Key Results Many kernels developed in controls but most aborted when {psi}w became low. Ovary invertase was active in controls but severely inhibited at low {psi}w for cell wall-bound forms in vivo and soluble forms in situ. All ovary genes for sucrose processing enzymes were rapidly down-regulated at low {psi}w except for a gene for invertase inhibitor peptide that appeared to be constitutively expressed. Some ovary genes for senescence were subsequently up-regulated (RIP2 and PLD1). In some genes, these regulatory changes were reversed by feeding sucrose to the stems. Abortion was partially prevented by feeding sucrose.

• Conclusions A general response to low {psi}w in maize ovaries was an early down-regulation of genes for sucrose processing enzymes followed by up-regulation of some genes involved in senescence. Because some of these genes were sucrose responsive, the partial prevention of abortion with sucrose feeding may have been caused in part by the differential sugar-responsiveness of these genes. The late up-regulation of senescence genes may have caused the irreversibility of abortion.

Key words: Zea mays, abortion, water potential, gene expression, senescence, sucrose, invertase, pollination, ovary development, sugar-responsive genes, ribosome inactivating protein, phospholipase D


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Plant Physiol.Home page
M. I. Zanor, S. Osorio, A. Nunes-Nesi, F. Carrari, M. Lohse, B. Usadel, C. Kuhn, W. Bleiss, P. Giavalisco, L. Willmitzer, et al.
RNA Interference of LIN5 in Tomato Confirms Its Role in Controlling Brix Content, Uncovers the Influence of Sugars on the Levels of Fruit Hormones, and Demonstrates the Importance of Sucrose Cleavage for Normal Fruit Development and Fertility
Plant Physiology, July 1, 2009; 150(3): 1204 - 1218.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Plant Physiol.Home page
N. C. Collins, F. Tardieu, and R. Tuberosa
Quantitative Trait Loci and Crop Performance under Abiotic Stress: Where Do We Stand?
Plant Physiology, June 1, 2008; 147(2): 469 - 486.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Crop Sci.Home page
R. Tuberosa, S. Salvi, S. Giuliani, M. C. Sanguineti, M. Bellotti, S. Conti, and P. Landi
Genome-wide Approaches to Investigate and Improve Maize Response to Drought
Crop Sci., December 18, 2007; 47(Supplement_3): S-120 - S-141.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Exp BotHome page
J. S. Boyer and J. E. McLaughlin
Functional reversion to identify controlling genes in multigenic responses: analysis of floral abortion
J. Exp. Bot., January 1, 2007; 58(2): 267 - 277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
P. MAKELA, J. E. McLAUGHLIN, and J. S. BOYER
Imaging and Quantifying Carbohydrate Transport to the Developing Ovaries of Maize
Ann. Bot., October 1, 2005; 96(5): 939 - 949.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.