Annals of Botany 95/1 © Annals of Botany Company 2005; all rights reserved
Life History Evolution and Genome Size in Subtribe Oncidiinae (Orchidaceae)
1 Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3DS, UK, 2 The Natural History Museums and Botanical Garden, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1172, Blindern, NO-0318 Oslo, Norway and 3 Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-7800, USA
* For correspondence. E-mail m.chase{at}kew.org
Received: 3 January 2004 Returned for revision: 19 February 2004 Accepted: 7 May 2004
Background and Aims Within Oncidiinae, there are several groups of species that are effectively annuals, and we wished to see if these species had smaller genome sizes than average for the subtribe.
Methods Fifty-four genome size estimates (50 of which are new) for species in subtribe Oncidiinae (Orchidaceae) were examined for the first time in a phylogenetic context to evaluate hypotheses concerning genome sizes and life history traits.
Results and Conclusions Within the limits of still relatively sparse sampling, the species that are effectively annuals do appear to have smaller genome sizes than average. However, the genome sizes of their immediate sister group are also small, indicating that changes in genome size preceded the change in life history traits. Genome sizes and chromosome numbers also do not correlate; some slowly growing species have lower chromosome numbers but large genomes and vice versa. Based on a survey of the literature on orchids, it is also clear that epiphytic species have smaller genome sizes than do terrestrial species, which could be an effect of different water relations or the fact that most terrestrial orchids are geophytic or have distinct growth and dormancy phases.
Key words: Genome size, orchids, phylogenetics, Oncidiinae, twig epiphytes, character optimization, chromosome number
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. J. Leitch, I. Kahandawala, J. Suda, L. Hanson, M. J. Ingrouille, M. W. Chase, and M. F. Fay Genome size diversity in orchids: consequences and evolution Ann. Bot., January 24, 2009; (2009) mcp003v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. M. Whitten, M. A. Blanco, N. H. Williams, S. Koehler, G. Carnevali, R. B. Singer, L. Endara, and K. M. Neubig Molecular phylogenetics of Maxillaria and related genera (Orchidaceae: Cymbidieae) based on combined molecular data sets Am. J. Botany, November 1, 2007; 94(11): 1860 - 1889. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Smarda, P. Bures, and L. Horova Random Distribution Pattern and Non-adaptivity of Genome Size in a Highly Variable Population of Festuca pallens Ann. Bot., July 1, 2007; 100(1): 141 - 150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Weiss-Schneeweiss, J. Greilhuber, and G. M. Schneeweiss Genome size evolution in holoparasitic Orobanche (Orobanchaceae) and related genera Am. J. Botany, December 1, 2005; 93(1): 148 - 156. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. BENNETT and I. J. LEITCH Plant Genome Size Research: A Field In Focus Ann. Bot., January 1, 2005; 95(1): 1 - 6. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

