Skip Navigation

Annals of Botany 2005 95(1):237-246; doi:10.1093/aob/mci017
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FAY, M. F.
Right arrow Articles by LEITCH, I. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by FAY, M. F.
Right arrow Articles by LEITCH, I. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by FAY, M. F.
Right arrow Articles by LEITCH, I. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Annals of Botany 95/1 © Annals of Botany Company 2005; all rights reserved

The Effects of Nuclear DNA Content (C-value) on the Quality and Utility of AFLP Fingerprints

MICHAEL F. FAY*, ROBYN S. COWAN and ILIA J. LEITCH

Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3DS, UK

* For correspondence. E-mail m.fay{at}kew.org

Received: 25 January 2004    Returned for revision: 15 April 2004    Accepted: 4 October 2004   

Background and Aims Nuclear DNA content (C-value) varies approximately 1000-fold across the angiosperms, and this variation has been reported to have an effect on the quality of AFLP fingerprints. Various methods have been proposed for circumventing the problems associated with small and large genomes. Here we investigate the range of nuclear DNA contents across which the standard AFLP protocol can be used.

Methods AFLP fingerprinting was conducted on an automated platform using the standard protocol (with 3 + 3 selective bases) in which DNA fragments are visualized as bands. Species with nuclear DNA contents ranging from 1C = 0·2 to 32·35 pg were included, and the total number of bands and the number of polymorphic bands were counted. For the species with the smallest C-value (Bixa orellana) and for one of the species with a large C-value (Damasonium alisma), alternative protocols using 2 + 3 and 3 + 4 selective bases, respectively, were also used.

Key Results Acceptable AFLP traces were obtained using the standard protocol with 1C-values of 0·30–8·43 pg. Below this range, the quality was improved by using 2 + 3 selective bases. Above this range, the traces were generally characterized by a few strongly amplifying bands and noisy baselines. Damasonium alisma, however, gave more even traces, probably due to it being a tetraploid.

Conclusions We propose that for known polyploids, genome size is a more useful indicator than the 1C-value in deciding which AFLP protocol to use. Thus, knowledge of ploidy (allowing estimation of genome size) and C-value are both important. For small genomes, the number of interpretable bands can be increased by decreasing the number of selective bases. For larger genomes, increasing the number of bases does not necessarily decrease the number of bands as predicted. The presence of a small number of strongly amplifying bands is likely to be linked to the presence of repetitive DNA sequences in high copy number in taxa with large genomes.

Key words: AFLP, genome size, C-value, ploidy, repetitive DNA


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
I. J. Leitch and M. F. Fay
Plant Genome Horizons: Michael Bennett's Contribution to Genome Research
Ann. Bot., April 1, 2008; 101(6): 737 - 746.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
D. S. Devey, R. M. Bateman, M. F. Fay, and J. A. Hawkins
Friends or Relatives? Phylogenetics and Species Delimitation in the Controversial European Orchid Genus Ophrys
Ann. Bot., February 1, 2008; 101(3): 385 - 402.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
D. F. Kapraun
Nuclear DNA Content Estimates in Green Algal Lineages: Chlorophyta and Streptophyta
Ann. Bot., April 1, 2007; 99(4): 677 - 701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
M. D. BENNETT and I. J. LEITCH
Plant Genome Size Research: A Field In Focus
Ann. Bot., January 1, 2005; 95(1): 1 - 6.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.