Annals of Botany 95/1 © Annals of Botany Company 2005; all rights reserved
Plant DNA Flow Cytometry and Estimation of Nuclear Genome Size
EL*
Laboratory of Molecular Cytogenetics and Cytometry, Institute of Experimental Botany, Sokolovská 6, Olomouc, CZ-77200, Czech Republic
* For correspondence. E-mail dolezel{at}ueb.cas.cz
Received: 17 November 2003 Returned for revision: 30 January 2004 Accepted: 11 February 2004
• Background DNA flow cytometry describes the use of flow cytometry for estimation of DNA quantity in cell nuclei. The method involves preparation of aqueous suspensions of intact nuclei whose DNA is stained using a DNA fluorochrome. The nuclei are classified according to their relative fluorescence intensity or DNA content. Because the sample preparation and analysis is convenient and rapid, DNA flow cytometry has become a popular method for ploidy screening, detection of mixoploidy and aneuploidy, cell cycle analysis, assessment of the degree of polysomaty, determination of reproductive pathway, and estimation of absolute DNA amount or genome size. While the former applications are relatively straightforward, estimation of absolute DNA amount requires special attention to possible errors in sample preparation and analysis.
• Scope The article reviews current procedures for estimation of absolute DNA amounts in plants using flow cytometry, with special emphasis on preparation of nuclei suspensions, stoichiometric DNA staining and the use of DNA reference standards. In addition, methodological pitfalls encountered in estimation of intraspecific variation in genome size are discussed as well as problems linked to the use of DNA flow cytometry for fieldwork.
• Conclusions Reliable estimation of absolute DNA amounts in plants using flow cytometry is not a trivial task. Although several well-proven protocols are available and some factors controlling the precision and reproducibility have been identified, several problems persist: (1) the need for fresh tissues complicates the transfer of samples from field to the laboratory and/or their storage; (2) the role of cytosolic compounds interfering with quantitative DNA staining is not well understood; and (3) the use of a set of internationally agreed DNA reference standards still remains an unrealized goal.
Key words: Flow cytometry, nuclear genome size, DNA C-value, nuclear DNA amount, DNA staining, intraspecific variation
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. D. Bennett, H. J. Price, and J. S. Johnston Anthocyanin Inhibits Propidium Iodide DNA Fluorescence in Euphorbia pulcherrima: Implications for Genome Size Variation and Flow Cytometry Ann. Bot., April 1, 2008; 101(6): 777 - 790. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. M. Reed, K. D. Jones, and T. A. Rinehart Production and Characterization of Intergeneric Hybrids between Dichroa febrifuga and Hydrangea macrophylla J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., January 1, 2008; 133(1): 84 - 91. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Besnard, C. Garcia-Verdugo, R. Rubio De Casas, U. A. Treier, N. Galland, and P. Vargas Polyploidy in the Olive Complex (Olea europaea): Evidence from Flow Cytometry and Nuclear Microsatellite Analyses Ann. Bot., January 1, 2008; 101(1): 25 - 30. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Loureiro, E. Rodriguez, J. Dolezel, and C. Santos Two New Nuclear Isolation Buffers for Plant DNA Flow Cytometry: A Test with 37 Species Ann. Bot., October 1, 2007; 100(4): 875 - 888. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. S. Heslop-Harrison and T. Schwarzacher Domestication, Genomics and the Future for Banana Ann. Bot., October 1, 2007; 100(5): 1073 - 1084. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V. Negron-Ortiz Chromosome numbers, nuclear DNA content, and polyploidy in Consolea (Cactaceae), an endemic cactus of the Caribbean Islands Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2007; 94(8): 1360 - 1370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. R. Gregory, J. A. Nicol, H. Tamm, B. Kullman, K. Kullman, I. J. Leitch, B. G. Murray, D. F. Kapraun, J. Greilhuber, and M. D. Bennett Eukaryotic genome size databases Nucleic Acids Res., January 12, 2007; 35(suppl_1): D332 - D338. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. LOUREIRO, E. RODRIGUEZ, J. DOLEZEL, and C. SANTOS Comparison of Four Nuclear Isolation Buffers for Plant DNA Flow Cytometry Ann. Bot., September 1, 2006; 98(3): 679 - 689. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. LOUREIRO, E. RODRIGUEZ, J. DOLEZEL, and C. SANTOS Flow Cytometric and Microscopic Analysis of the Effect of Tannic Acid on Plant Nuclei and Estimation of DNA Content Ann. Bot., September 1, 2006; 98(3): 515 - 527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. SMARDA and P. BURES Intraspecific DNA Content Variability in Festuca pallens on Different Geographical Scales and Ploidy Levels Ann. Bot., September 1, 2006; 98(3): 665 - 678. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. L. Rayburn, R. McCloskey, T. C. Tatum, G. A. Bollero, M. R. Jeschke, and P. J. Tranel Genome Size Analysis of Weedy Amaranthus Species Crop Sci., October 27, 2005; 45(6): 2557 - 2562. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. D. BENNETT and I. J. LEITCH Plant Genome Size Research: A Field In Focus Ann. Bot., January 1, 2005; 95(1): 1 - 6. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. D. BENNETT and I. J. LEITCH Nuclear DNA Amounts in Angiosperms: Progress, Problems and Prospects Ann. Bot., January 1, 2005; 95(1): 45 - 90. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. GREILHUBER Intraspecific Variation in Genome Size in Angiosperms: Identifying its Existence Ann. Bot., January 1, 2005; 95(1): 91 - 98. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. NOIROT, P. BARRE, C. DUPERRAY, S. HAMON, and A. DE KOCHKO Investigation on the Causes of Stoichiometric Error in Genome Size Estimation Using Heat Experiments: Consequences on Data Interpretation Ann. Bot., January 1, 2005; 95(1): 111 - 118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. W. CHASE, L. HANSON, V. A. ALBERT, W. M. WHITTEN, and N. H. WILLIAMS Life History Evolution and Genome Size in Subtribe Oncidiinae (Orchidaceae) Ann. Bot., January 1, 2005; 95(1): 191 - 199. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|