Skip Navigation


AOBPreview originally published online on February 8, 2005
Annals of Botany 2005 95(5):817-826; doi:10.1093/aob/mci085
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Content Select
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
95/5/817    most recent
mci085v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GARNETT, T. P.
Right arrow Articles by GRAHAM, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by GARNETT, T. P.
Right arrow Articles by GRAHAM, R. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by GARNETT, T. P.
Right arrow Articles by GRAHAM, R. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions{at}oupjournals.org

Distribution and Remobilization of Iron and Copper in Wheat

TREVOR P. GARNETT* and ROBIN D. GRAHAM

Department of Plant and Pest Science, University of Adelaide, Waite Campus, Glen Osmond, South Australia 5064, Australia

* For correspondence at: South Australian Research and Development Institute, GPO Box 397, Adelaide, South Australia 5001, Australia. E-mail garnett.trevor{at}saugov.sa.gov.au

Received: 21 September 2004    Returned for revision: 5 November 2004    Accepted: 20 December 2004    Published electronically: 8 February 2005

Background and Aims The amount of iron (Fe) and copper (Cu) that is loaded into grains of wheat (Triticum aestivum) depends on both the amount of nutrient taken up by the plant post-anthesis and the amount that is remobilized from vegetative organs as they senesce. Previous reports have shown that these two micronutrients behave quite differently in wheat in that Cu is readily remobilized to the grain whilst Fe shows poor remobilization. The object was to quantify the distribution of Fe and Cu in wheat and to show how this distribution changes from anthesis to grain maturity.

Methods The uptake and distribution of both Fe and Cu were investigated in wheat grown at two levels, adequate and low, of both micronutrients. Plants were grown in sand culture and the main culms were harvested at anthesis, 18 days post-anthesis and at maturity. Plants were separated into various organs and analysed for Fe and Cu using ICP-OES.

Key Results There was good remobilization of Fe from the rest of the shoot to the grain with 77 % of the total shoot Fe in the grain at maturity. In the adequate-Cu treatment there was 62 % of the total plant Cu in the grain at maturity, whereas in the low-Cu treatment this was only 40 %. There was no net Fe taken up into the above-ground plant parts post-anthesis whilst for Cu there was. The remobilization evident for Fe and Cu was greater than that found for zinc and much greater than evident for manganese in the same material.

Conclusions The results reported here represent good evidence for the high reproductive mobility of both Fe and Cu in wheat.

Key words: Iron, copper, wheat, distribution, remobilization, Triticum aestivum, zinc, manganese, grain


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
B. M. Waters, C. Uauy, J. Dubcovsky, and M. A. Grusak
Wheat (Triticum aestivum) NAM proteins regulate the translocation of iron, zinc, and nitrogen compounds from vegetative tissues to grain
J. Exp. Bot., November 1, 2009; 60(15): 4263 - 4274.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.