AOBPreview originally published online on February 8, 2005
Annals of Botany 2005 95(5):843-851; doi:10.1093/aob/mci089
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Genetic Diversity and Geographic Differentiation in Endangered Ammopiptanthus (Leguminosae) Populations in Desert Regions of Northwest China as Revealed by ISSR Analysis
1 South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, P. R. China, 2 Laboratory of Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, University of Neuchâtel, CH-2007 Neuchâtel, Switzerland, 3 Wuhan Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430074, P. R. China and 4 Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, P. R. China
* For correspondence. E-mail xjge{at}scbg.ac.cn
Received: 10 May 2004 Returned for revision: 29 July 2004 Accepted: 22 December 2004 Published electronically: 8 February 2005
Background and Aims The desert legume genus Ammopiptanthus comprises two currently endangered species, A. mongolicus and A. nanus. Genetic variability and genetic differentiation between the two species and within each species were examined.
Methods Inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) marker data were obtained and analysed with respect to genetic diversity, structure and gene flow.
Key Results Despite the morphological similarity between A. mongolicus and A. nanus, the two species are genetically distinct from each other, indicated by 63 % species-specific bands. Low genetic variability was detected for both population level (Shannon indices of diversity Hpop = 0·106, percentage of polymorphic loci P = 18·55 % for A. mongolicus; Hpop = 0·070, P = 12·24 % for A. nanus) and species level (Hsp = 0·1832, P = 39·39 % for A. mongolicus; Hsp = 0·1026, P = 25·89 % for A. nanus). Moderate genetic differentiation was found based on different measures (AMOVA
ST and Hickory
B) in both A. mongolicus (0·37430·3744) and A. nanus (0·21620·2369).
Conclusions The significant genetic difference between the two species might be due to a possible vicariant evolutionary event from a single common ancestor through the fragmentation of their common ancestor's range. Conservation strategies for these two endangered species are proposed.
Key words: Ammopiptanthus mongolicus, Ammopiptanthus nanus, desert, endangered plants, genetic diversity, ISSR
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. WESCHE, I. HENSEN, and R. UNDRAKH Genetic Structure of Galitzkya macrocarpa and G. potaninii, Two Closely Related Endemics of Central Asian Mountain Ranges Ann. Bot., November 1, 2006; 98(5): 1025 - 1034. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. CHUNG, B. C. LEE, J. S. KIM, C.-W. PARK, M. YOON CHUNG, and M. GI CHUNG Fine-scale Genetic Structure among Genetic Individuals of the Clone-Forming Monotypic Genus Echinosophora koreensis (Fabaceae) Ann. Bot., July 1, 2006; 98(1): 165 - 173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
