Skip Navigation


AOBPreview originally published online on June 2, 2005
Annals of Botany 2005 96(2):269-278; doi:10.1093/aob/mci175
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
96/2/269    most recent
mci175v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FUSTEC, J.
Right arrow Articles by MAITRE, J.-P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by FUSTEC, J.
Right arrow Articles by MAITRE, J.-P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by FUSTEC, J.
Right arrow Articles by MAITRE, J.-P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Comparison of Early Development of Three Grasses: Lolium perenne, Agrostis stolonifera and Poa pratensis

JOELLE FUSTEC1,*, JOELLE GUILLEUX2, JOSIANE LE CORFF2 and JEAN-PAUL MAITRE2

1 Laboratoire d'Ecophysiologie Végétale et Agroécologie, Ecole Supérieure d'Agriculture, 55 rue Rabelais, BP 30748, 49007 Angers cedex 01, France and 2 Unité Mixte de Recherche Sciences Agronomiques Appliquées à l'Horticulture A-462, 42 rue Georges Morel, BP 60057, 49071 Beaucouzé cedex, France

* For correspondence. E-mail j.fustec{at}groupe-esa.com

Received: 8 December 2004    Returned for revision: 10 February 2005    Accepted: 25 April 2005    Published electronically: 2 June 2005

Background and Aims To improve the management of grass communities, early plant development was compared in three species with contrasting growth forms, a caespitose (Lolium perenne), a rhizomatous (Poa pratensis) and a caespitose–stoloniferous species (Agrostis stolonifera).

Methods Isolated seedlings were grown in a glasshouse without trophic constraints for 37 d (761 °Cd). The appearance of leaves and their location on tillers were recorded. Leaf appearance rate (LAR) on the tillers and site-filling were calculated. Tillering was modelled based on the assumption that tiller number increases with the number of leaves produced on the seedling main stem. Above- and below-ground parts were harvested to compare biomass.

Key Results Lolium perenne and A. stolonifera expressed similar bunch-type developments. However, root biomass was approx. 30 % lower in A. stolonifera than in L. perenne. Poa pratensis was rhizomatous. Nevertheless, the ratio of above-ground : below-ground biomass of P. pratensis was similar to that of L. perenne. LAR was approximately equal to 0·30 leaf d–1 in L. perenne, and on the main stem and first primary tillers of A. stolonifera. LAR on the other tillers of A. stolonifera was 30 % higher than on L. perenne. For P. pratensis, LAR was 30 % lower than on L. perenne, but the interval between the appearance of two successive shoots from rhizomes was 30 % higher than the interval between two successive leaf stages on the main stem. Above-ground parts of P. pratensis first grew slower than in the other species to the benefit of the rhizomes, whose development enhanced tiller production.

Conclusions Lolium perenne had the fastest tiller production at the earliest stages of seedling development. Agrostis stolonifera and P. pratensis compensated almost completely for the delay due to higher LAR on tillers or ramets compared with L. perenne. This study provides a basis for modelling plant development.

Key words: Lolium perenne, perennial ryegrass, Agrostis stolonifera, creeping bentgrass, Poa pratensis, Kentucky bluegrass, space colonization, Gramineae, morphogenesis, tillering model, growth strategy, site-filling


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.