Skip Navigation


AOBPreview originally published online on August 10, 2005
Annals of Botany 2005 96(4):541-555; doi:10.1093/aob/mci209
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
96/4/541    most recent
mci209v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FINLAYSON, C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by FINLAYSON, C. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by FINLAYSON, C. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© Commonwealth of Australia 2005. Reproduced with permission of the Supervising Scientist Division of the Department of Environment and Heritage


INVITED REVIEW

Plant Ecology of Australia's Tropical Floodplain Wetlands: A Review

C. M. FINLAYSON*

Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist, GPO Box 461, Darwin, NT 0801, Australia

* For correspondence. Present address: IWMI, PO Box 2075, Colombo, Sri Lanka. E-mail m.finlayson{at}cgiar.org

Received: 20 December 2004    Returned for revision: 8 March 2005    Accepted: 4 May 2005    Published electronically: 10 August 2005

Aims Despite the biodiversity values of the freshwater floodplains of northern Australia being widely recognized, there has not been a concomitant investment in developing the extent of knowledge of the basic functions and ecological processes that underpin the ecological character of these habitats. This review addresses the extent of our knowledge on the plant ecology of these wetlands and covers: the relationships between the climate and the hydrological regime on the floodplain; the vegetation patterns, succession and adaptation; and primary production.

Scope Information is available on the seasonal, but less regularly on the inter-annual, dynamics of the macrophytic vegetation and its evident inter-relationship with the extent, depth and duration of inundation by seasonal flooding. The available scientifically collected information on plant distribution and relationship with the water regime could be complemented by more attention to traditional knowledge. The productivity of the vegetation is high—the dominant wetland grass species have an annual dry weight production of 0·5–2·1 kg m–2 and the surrounding riparian (Melaleuca) trees contribute litterfall of 0·7–1·5 kg (dry weight) m–2 year–1, ~70 % due to leaf-fall. The availability of dissolved oxygen in the water is known to vary diurnally and seasonally, at least in some habitats. The importance of seasonal differences in the availability of dissolved oxygen for the growth of micro- and macrophytic vegetation has not been investigated. The seasonal distribution and growth of plant species on a few floodplains have been investigated, and maps at scales of 1 : 10 000 to 1 : 100 000 are available for these. However, only on a few occasions have longer term analyses been conducted and long-term changes in the vegetation measured and assessed. Species lists and categorization of growth strategies and forms are available and provide a basis for further ecological investigation.

Conclusions Despite the large investment in managing the many pressures that have degraded the ecological character of these highly valued wetlands, the fundamental ecological processes that underpin the biodiversity values have not received the same level of attention. Further information on plant growth and the environmental factors that drive seasonal and annual changes in vegetation distribution and productivity is required to assist managers in attending to changes due to increasing invasive species and changes in fire regimes.

Key words: Aquatic plants, plant biomass, productivity, succession


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
C. E. Hinchliff and E. H. Roalson
Stem architecture in Eleocharis subgenus Limnochloa (Cyperaceae): Evidence of dynamic morphological evolution in a group of pantropical sedges
Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2009; 96(8): 1487 - 1499.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
M. B. JACKSON and T. D. COLMER
Response and Adaptation by Plants to Flooding Stress
Ann. Bot., September 1, 2005; 96(4): 501 - 505.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.