Skip Navigation


AOBPreview originally published online on October 17, 2005
Annals of Botany 2005 96(7):1321-1330; doi:10.1093/aob/mci284
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary information
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
96/7/1321    most recent
mci284v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MORGAN, H. D.
Right arrow Articles by WESTOBY, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MORGAN, H. D.
Right arrow Articles by WESTOBY, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by MORGAN, H. D.
Right arrow Articles by WESTOBY, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company 2005

The Relationship Between Nuclear DNA Content and Leaf Strategy in Seed Plants

HUW D. MORGAN* and MARK WESTOBY

Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia

* For correspondence. E-mail hmorgan{at}bio.mq.edu.au

Received: 4 August 2004    Returned for revision: 18 December 2004    Accepted: 19 September 2005    Published electronically: 17 October 2005

Background and Aims Species' 2C-values (mass of DNA in G1 phase 2n nuclei) vary by at least four orders of magnitude among seed plants. The 2C-value has been shown to be co-ordinated with a number of other species traits, and with environmental variables. A prediction that species 2C-values are negatively related to leaf life span (LL) and leaf mass per area (LMA) is tested. These leaf traits are components of a major dimension of ecological variation among plant species.

Methods Flow cytometry was used to measure the 2C-values for 41 Australian seed plant species, 40 of which were new to the literature. Where possible, LL and LMA data from the global literature were combined with 2C-values from our data set and online C-value databases.

Key Results Across all species, weak positive relationships were found between 2C-values and both LL and LMA; however, these did not reflect the relationships within either angiosperms or gymnosperms. Across 59 angiosperm species, there were weak negative relationships between 2C-values and both LL (r2 = 0·13, P = 0·005) and LMA (r2 = 0·15, P = 0·002). These relationships were the result of shifts to longer LL and greater LMA in woody compared with herbaceous growth forms, with no relationships present within growth forms. It was not possible to explain a positive relationship between 2C-values and LMA (r2 = 0·30, P = 0·024) across 17 gymnosperm species. The 2C-value was not related to LL or LMA either across species within orders (except for LMA among Pinales), or as radiation divergences in a model phylogeny.

Conclusions Gymnosperms appear to vary along a spectrum different from angiosperms. Among angiosperms, weak negative cross-species relationships were associated with growth form differences, and traced to a few divergences deep in the model phylogeny. These results suggest that among angiosperms, nuclear DNA content and leaf strategy are unrelated.

Key words: Genome size, C-value, leaf life span, leaf mass per area, LMA, SLA, angiosperms, gymnosperms, correlated divergence analysis, standardized major axis


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
J. M. Beaulieu, I. J. Leitch, and C. A. Knight
Genome Size Evolution in Relation to Leaf Strategy and Metabolic Rates Revisited
Ann. Bot., March 1, 2007; 99(3): 495 - 505.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.