Skip Navigation


AOBPreview originally published online on January 3, 2006
Annals of Botany 2006 97(3):453-459; doi:10.1093/aob/mcj049
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
97/3/453    most recent
mcj049v2
mcj049v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ISHIKAWA, M.
Right arrow Articles by GUSTA, L. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by ISHIKAWA, M.
Right arrow Articles by GUSTA, L. V.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by ISHIKAWA, M.
Right arrow Articles by GUSTA, L. V.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Effect of Growth Phase on Survival of Bromegrass Suspension Cells Following Cryopreservation and Abiotic Stresses

MASAYA ISHIKAWA1,*,{dagger}, MITSUTERU SUZUKI1,{dagger}, TOSHIHIDE NAKAMURA1, TADASHI KISHIMOTO1, ALBERT J. ROBERTSON2 and LAWRENCE V. GUSTA2

1 Genetic Diversity Department, National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, Kannondai 2-1-2, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan 305-8602 and 2 Department of Plant Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada S7N 5A8

* For correspondence. E-mail isikawam{at}affrc.go.jp

Received: 14 September 2005    Returned for revision: 11 November 2005    Accepted: 22 November 2005    Published electronically: 3 January 2006

Background and Aims Cryopreservation is a practical method of preserving plant cell cultures and their genetic integrity. It has long been believed that cryopreservation of plant cell cultures is best performed with cells at the late lag or early exponential growth phase. At these stages the cells are small and non-vacuolated. This belief was based on studies using conventional slow prefreezing protocols and survival determined with fluorescein diacetate staining or 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride assays. This classical issue was revisited here to determine the optimum growth phase for cryopreserving a bromegrass (Bromus inermis) suspension culture using more recently developed protocols and regrowth assays for determination of survival.

Methods Cells at different growth phases were cryopreserved using three protocols: slow prefreezing, rapid prefreezing and vitrification. Stage-dependent trends in cell osmolarity, water content and tolerance to freezing, heat and salt stresses were also determined. In all cases survival was assayed by regrowth of cells following the treatments.

Key Results Slow prefreezing and rapid prefreezing protocols resulted in higher cell survival compared with the vitrification method. For all the protocols used, the best regrowth was obtained using cells in the late exponential or early stationary phase, whereas lowest survival was obtained for cells in the late lag or early exponential phase. Cells at the late exponential phase were characterized by high water content and high osmolarity and were most tolerant to freezing, heat and salt stresses, whereas cells at the early exponential phase, characterized by low water content and low osmolarity, were least tolerant.

Conclusions The results are contrary to the classical concept which utilizes cells in the late lag or early exponential growth phase for cryopreservation. The optimal growth phase for cryopreservation may depend upon the species or cell culture being cryopreserved and requires re-investigation for each cell culture. Stage-dependent survival following cryopreservation was proportionally correlated with the levels of abiotic stress tolerance in bromegrass cells.

Key words: Bromegrass (Bromus inermis), cryopreservation, freezing, heat, salt, vitrification, prefreezing, culture growth phase, suspension cultures, regrowth, viability assay, osmolarity


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
T. Nakamura, M. Ishikawa, H. Nakatani, and A. Oda
Characterization of Cold-Responsive Extracellular Chitinase in Bromegrass Cell Cultures and Its Relationship to Antifreeze Activity
Plant Physiology, May 1, 2008; 147(1): 391 - 401.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.