AOBPreview originally published online on February 14, 2006
Annals of Botany 2006 97(4):505-511; doi:10.1093/aob/mcl011
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sporophyte and Gametophyte Generations Differ in their Thermotolerance Response in the Moss Microbryum
1 Department of Biology, 101 Morgan Building, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0225, USA and 2 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Nevada, 4505 Maryland Parkway, Las Vegas, NV 89154-4004, USA
* For correspondence. E-mail lrs{at}unlv.nevada.edu
Received: 7 September 2005 Returned for revision: 8 November 2005 Accepted: 21 December 2005 Published electronically: 14 February 2006
Background and Aims Actively growing post-embryonic sporophytes of desert mosses are restricted to the cooler, wetter months. However, most desert mosses have perennial gametophytes. It is hypothesized that these life history patterns are due in part to a reduced thermotolerance for sporophytes relative to gametophytes.
Methods Gametophytes with attached embryonic sporophytes of Microbryum starckeanum were exposed whilst desiccated to thermal episodes of 35 °C (1 hr), 55 °C (1 hr), 75 °C (1 hr) and 75 °C (3 hr), then moistened and allowed to recover for 35 d in a growth chamber.
Key Results All of the gametophytes survived the thermal exposures and produced protonemata, with the majority also producing shoot buds. Symptoms of gametophytic stress (leaf burning and discoloration of entire shoots) were present in lower frequencies in the 55 °C exposure. Sporophyte resumption of growth and maturation to meiosis were significantly negatively affected by thermal treatment. Not a single sporophyte exposed to the two higher thermal treatments (75 °C for 1 h and 75 °C for 3 h) survived to meiosis, and those sporophytes exposed to 75 °C that survived to the post-embryonic phenophase took significantly longer to reach this phase. Furthermore, among the thermal treatments where some capsules reached maturity (35 °C and 55 °C), maternal shoots that produced a meiotic capsule took longer to regenerate through protonemata than maternal shoots aborting their sporophyte, suggestive of a resource trade-off between generations.
Conclusions Either (1) the inherent sporophyte thermotolerance is quite low even in this desert moss, and/or (2) a gametophytic thermal stress response controls sporophyte viability.
Key words: Bryophyte, thermal stress, regeneration, sporophyte, gametophyte, protonema, Microbryum starckeanum
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. R. Stark, M. J. Oliver, B. D. Mishler, and D. N. McLetchie Generational Differences in Response to Desiccation Stress in the Desert Moss Tortula inermis Ann. Bot., January 1, 2007; 99(1): 53 - 60. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
