AOBPreview originally published online on May 10, 2006
Annals of Botany 2006 98(1):187-191; doi:10.1093/aob/mcl086
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A Trade-off Between Guerrilla and Phalanx Growth Forms in Leymus secalinus Under Different Nutrient Supplies
1 Laboratory of Quantitative Vegetation Ecology, Institute of Botany, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, 20 Nanxincun, Fragrant Hills, Haidian District, Beijing 100093, China and 2 The Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, China
* For correspondence. E-mail dongming{at}ibcas.ac.cn
Received: 21 November 2005 Returned for revision: 24 January 2006 Accepted: 8 March 2006 Published electronically: 10 May 2006
• Background and Aims A phalanx growth form enables clonal plants to make better use of resource-rich patches, whereas a guerrilla growth form provides them with opportunities to escape from resource-poor sites. Leymus secalinus produces both spreading (guerrilla form) and clumping ramets (phalanx form). Here, the hypothesis that a trade-off between the two growth forms in L. secalinus exists under different resource levels is tested.
• Methods Ramets of L. secalinus were grown under three levels of nutrient supply.
• Key Results With increasing nutrient supply, the proportion of clumping ramets (in total number of ramets) increased, whereas that of spreading ramets decreased. With increasing nutrient supply, the number of buds increased, whereas biomass per bud decreased. A trade-off between bud number and size further supports the above hypothesis because larger buds were more likely to develop into spreading ramets, and smaller buds into clumping ramets. Mean spacer length between spreading ramets was significantly smaller under the high than under the medium nutrient supply.
• Conclusions The results suggest that a trade-off between the two growth forms in L. secalinus exists under different nutrient supplies. Such a trade-off together with plasticity in spacer morphology may enable L. secalinus to make better use of small-scale heterogeneity in resource supply.
Key words: Architectural plasticity, bud size–number trade-off, clumping ramets, growth form trade-off, Leymus secalinus, morphological plasticity, spreading ramets
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  K. Araki, K. Shimatani, and M. Ohara Dynamics of distribution and performance of ramets constructing genets: a demographic-genetic study in a clonal plant, Convallaria keiskei Ann. Bot., July 1, 2009; 104(1): 71 - 79. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Puijalon, T. J. Bouma, J. Van Groenendael, and G. Bornette Clonal Plasticity of Aquatic Plant Species Submitted to Mechanical Stress: Escape versus Resistance Strategy Ann. Bot., December 1, 2008; 102(6): 989 - 996. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. F. Coelho, C. Capelo, L. C. Ribeiro, and J. E. C. Figueira Reproductive Modes in Leiothrix (Eriocaulaceae) in South-eastern Brazil: The Role of Microenvironmental Heterogeneity Ann. Bot., February 1, 2008; 101(3): 353 - 360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|