Skip Navigation


AOBPreview originally published online on July 27, 2006
Annals of Botany 2006 98(4):741-753; doi:10.1093/aob/mcl157
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/4/741    most recent
mcl157v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GARCIA-JACAS, N.
Right arrow Articles by SUSANNA, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by GARCIA-JACAS, N.
Right arrow Articles by SUSANNA, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by GARCIA-JACAS, N.
Right arrow Articles by SUSANNA, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Centaurea Revisited: A Molecular Survey of the Jacea Group

N. GARCIA-JACAS1,*, T. UYSAL2, K. ROMASHCHENKO3, V. N. SUÁREZ-SANTIAGO4, K. ERTUGRUL2 and A. SUSANNA1

1 Botanic Institute of Barcelona (CSIC-ICUB), Passeig del Migdia s.n., E-08038 Barcelona, Spain, 2 Department of Biology, Faculty of Science and Art, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey, 3 Institute of Botany M. G. Kholodny, Tereshchenkovska 2, 01601 Kiev, Ukraine and 4 Department of Botany, Science Faculty, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain

* For correspondence. E-mail ngarciajacas{at}ibb.csic.es

Received: 9 December 2005    Returned for revision: 11 April 2006    Accepted: 6 June 2006    Published electronically: 27 July 2006

Background and Aims The genus Centaurea has traditionally been considered to be a complicated taxon. No attempt at phylogenetic reconstruction has been made since recent revisions in circumscription, and previous reconstructions did not include a good representation of species. A new molecular survey is thus needed.

Methods Phylogenetic analyses were conducted using sequences of the internal transcribed spacers (ITS) 1 and 2 and the 5·8S gene. Parsimony and Bayesian approaches were used.

Key Results A close correlation between geography and the phylogenetic tree based on ITS sequences was found in all the analyses, with three main groups being resolved: (1) comprising the most widely distributed circum-Mediterranean/Eurosiberian sections; (2) the western Mediterranean sections; and (3) the eastern Mediterranean and Irano-Turanian sections. The results show that the sectional classification in current use needs major revision, with many old sections being merged into larger ones. A large polytomy in the eastern Mediterranean clade suggests a rapid and recent speciation in this group. Some inconsistencies between morphology and molecular phylogeny may indicate that hybridization has played a major role in the evolution of the genus.

Conclusions Phylogenetic analysis of ITS has been useful in identifying the major lineages in the group, and unraveling many inconsistencies in the sectional classification. However, most recent groups in the eastern Mediterranean clade are not resolved and reticulation in the western Mediterranean group of sections makes phylogenetic relationships within these two groups somewhat obscure.

Key words: Cardueae, Centaureinae, Centaurea, Centaurea jacea group, hybridization, ITS sequences, phylogeny, systematics


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.