Skip Navigation

Annals of Botany 2007 99(1):141-151; doi:10.1093/aob/mcl235
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Selaya, N. G.
Right arrow Articles by Werger, M. J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Selaya, N. G.
Right arrow Articles by Werger, M. J. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Selaya, N. G.
Right arrow Articles by Werger, M. J. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Above-ground Biomass Investments and Light Interception of Tropical Forest Trees and Lianas Early in Succession

N. G. Selaya1,2,*, N. P. R. Anten1,3, R. J. Oomen1, M. Matthies1 and M. J. A. Werger1

1 Section of Plant Ecology and Biodiversity, Institute of Environmental Biology Utrecht University, PO Box 80084, 3508 TB Utrecht, The Netherlands
2 Programa Manejo de Bosques de la Amazonía Boliviana (PROMAB), Casilla 107, Riberalta, Bolivia
3 Chair Group of Plant Production Systems, Wageningen University, Haarweg 333, 6709 RZ, Wageningen, The Netherlands

* For correspondence. E-mail N.GaliaSelaya{at}bio.uu.nl

Received: 10 July 2006    Returned for revision: 22 August 2006    Accepted: 6 September 2006   

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Crown structure and above-ground biomass investment was studied in relation to light interception of trees and lianas growing in a 6-month-old regenerating forest.

METHODS: The vertical distribution of total above-ground biomass, height, diameter, stem density, leaf angles and crown depth were measured for individual plants of three short-lived pioneers (SLPs), four long-lived pioneers (LLPs) and three lianas. Daily light interception per individual {Phi}d was calculated with a canopy model. The model was then used to estimate light interception per unit of leaf mass ({Phi}leaf mass), total above-ground mass ({Phi}mass) and crown structure efficiency (Ea, the ratio of absorbed vs. available light).

KEY RESULTS: The SLPs Trema and Ochroma intercepted higher amounts of light per unit leaf mass ({Phi}leaf mass) because they had shallower crowns, resulting in higher crown use efficiency (Ea) than the other species. These SLPs (but not Cecropia) were also taller and intercepted more light per unit leaf area ({Phi}area). LLPs and lianas had considerably higher amounts of leaf mass and area per unit above-ground mass (LMR and LAR, respectively) and thus attained {Phi}mass values similar to the SLPs ({Phi}mass={Phi}areaxLAR). Lianas, which were mostly self-supporting, had light interception efficiencies similar to those of the trees.

CONCLUSIONS: These results show how, due to the trade-off between crown structure and biomass allocation, SLPs, and LLPs and lianas intercept similar amount of light per unit mass which may contribute to the ability of the latter two groups to persist.

Key words: Bolivia, canopy model, crown structure, leaf mass ratio, lianas, light interception, pioneers, specific leaf area, tropical forest


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
Z.-Q. Cai, L. Poorter, K.-F. Cao, and F. Bongers
Seedling Growth Strategies in Bauhinia Species: Comparing Lianas and Trees
Ann. Bot., October 1, 2007; 100(4): 831 - 838.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.