AOBPreview originally published online on November 30, 2006
Annals of Botany 2007 99(4):565-579; doi:10.1093/aob/mcl249
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INVITED REVIEW |
Plastid Division: Evolution, Mechanism and Complexity
Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Stavanger, 4036 Stavanger, Norway
* For correspondence. E-mail simon.g.moller{at}uis.no
Received: 8 August 2006 Returned for revision: 18 September 2006 Accepted: 29 September 2006 Published electronically: 30 November 2006
Background: The continuity of chloroplasts is maintained by division of pre-existing chloroplasts. Chloroplasts originated as bacterial endosymbionts; however, the majority of bacterial division factors are absent from chloroplasts and the eukaryotic host has added several new components. For example, the ftsZ gene has been duplicated and modified, and the Min system has retained MinE and MinD but lost MinC, acquiring at least one new component ARC3. Further, the mechanism has evolved to include two members of the dynamin protein family, ARC5 and FZL, and plastid-dividing (PD) rings were most probably added by the eukaryotic host.
Scope: Deciphering how the division of plastids is coordinated and controlled by nuclear-encoded factors is key to our understanding of this important biological process. Through a number of molecular-genetic and biochemical approaches, it is evident that FtsZ initiates plastid division where the coordinated action of MinD and MinE ensures correct FtsZ (Z)-ring placement. Although the classical FtsZ antagonist MinC does not exist in plants, ARC3 may fulfil this role. Together with other prokaryotic-derived proteins such as ARC6 and GC1 and key eukaryotic-derived proteins such as ARC5 and FZL, these proteins make up a sophisticated division machinery. The regulation of plastid division in a cellular context is largely unknown; however, recent microarray data shed light on this. Here the current understanding of the mechanism of chloroplast division in higher plants is reviewed with an emphasis on how recent findings are beginning to shape our understanding of the function and evolution of the components.
Conclusions: Extrapolation from the mechanism of bacterial cell division provides valuable clues as to how the chloroplast division process is achieved in plant cells. However, it is becoming increasingly clear that the highly regulated mechanism of plastid division within the host cell has led to the evolution of features unique to the plastid division process.
Key words: Arabidopsis, ARC, E. coli cell division, Min system, plastid division, FtsZ
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Koniger, J. A. Delamaide, E. D. Marlow, and G. C. Harris Arabidopsis thaliana leaves with altered chloroplast numbers and chloroplast movement exhibit impaired adjustments to both low and high light J. Exp. Bot., May 8, 2008; (2008) ern099v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Maple and S. G. Moller Interdependency of formation and localisation of the Min complex controls symmetric plastid division J. Cell Sci., October 1, 2007; 120(19): 3446 - 3456. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|