Skip Navigation

Annals of Botany 2007 99(5):1023-1034; doi:10.1093/aob/mcm037
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hunt, R.
Right arrow Articles by Colasanti, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hunt, R.
Right arrow Articles by Colasanti, R. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hunt, R.
Right arrow Articles by Colasanti, R. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Self-assembling Plants and Integration across Ecological Scales

Roderick Hunt1,* and R. L. Colasanti2,3

1 School of Biosciences, University of Exeter, The Innovation Centre, Rennes Drive, Exeter, EX4 4RN, UK
2 US Environmental Protection Agency, 200 SW 35th Street, Corvallis, OR 97333, USA
3 CSIRO, Long Pocket Laboratories, 120 Meiers Road, Indooroopilly, QLD 4068, Australia

* For correspondence. E-mail r.hunt{at}exeter.ac.uk

Received: 6 November 2006    Returned for revision: 8 December 2006    Accepted: 24 January 2006   

Background and Aims: Although individual plants exhibit much complex behaviour in response to environmental stimuli, they appear to do so without any identifiable centres of organization. We review a special class of model with the aim of testing whether plants can effectively be self-assembling, modular-driven organisms, in the sense that whole-plant organization and behaviour emerges solely from the interactions of much smaller structural elements. We also review evidence that still higher-level behaviour, at the population and community levels of organization, can emerge from this same source.

Methods: In previous work we devised a special cellular automaton (CA) model of plant growth. This comprises a section depicting a two-dimensional plant in its above- and below-ground environments. The whole plant is represented by branching structures made up from identical ‘modules’. The activity of these modules is driven by morphological, physiological and reproductive rulesets derived from comparative plant ecology, a feature which lends itself to experimentation at several ecological scales.

Key Results: From real experiments using virtual plants we show that the model can reproduce a very wide range of whole-plant-, population- and community-level behaviour. All of these properties emerge successfully from a ruleset acting only at the level of the CA module.

Conclusions: The CA model can, with advantage, be driven by C-S-R plant strategy theory. As this theory can ascribe a functional classification to any temperate angiosperm on the basis of a few simple tests, any community of such plants can be redescribed in terms of its ‘functional signature’ and the net environment that it experiences. To a valuable first approximation, therefore, a C-S-R version of the CA model can simulate the most essential properties both of natural vegetation and of its environment. We have thus achieved a position from which we can test a plethora of high-level community processes, such as diversity, vulnerability, resistance, resilience, stability, and habitat-community heterogeneity – processes which, if investigated on the scales truly required for a full understanding, would fall beyond the practical scope of even the largest real-life investigation.

Key words: Self-assembling plants, cellular automata, vegetation dynamics, L-system, population, community, emergent properties, biodiversity


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
B. Shipley
Comparative Plant Ecology as a Tool for Integrating Across Scales
Ann. Bot., May 1, 2007; 99(5): 965 - 966.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.