Skip Navigation



AOBPreview published online on January 13, 2009

Annals of Botany, doi:10.1093/aob/mcn258
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mondragón-Palomino, M.
Right arrow Articles by Theißen, G.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mondragón-Palomino, M.
Right arrow Articles by Theißen, G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Mondragón-Palomino, M.
Right arrow Articles by Theißen, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Why are orchid flowers so diverse? Reduction of evolutionary constraints by paralogues of class B floral homeotic genes

Mariana Mondragón-Palomino* and Günter Theißen

Department of Genetics, Friedrich-Schiller-University, D-07743 Jena, Germany

* For correspondence: E-mail mariana.mondragon{at}uni-jena.de

Received: 9 June 2008    Returned for revision: 29 July 2008    Accepted: 17 November 2008   

Background: The nearly 30 000 species of orchids produce flowers of unprecedented diversity. However, whether specific genetic mechanisms contributed to this diversity is a neglected topic and remains speculative. We recently published a theory, the ‘orchid code’, maintaining that the identity of the different perianth organs is specified by the combinatorial interaction of four DEF-like MADS-box genes with other floral homeotic genes.

Scope: Here the developmental and evolutionary implications of our theory are explored. Specifically, it is shown that all frequent floral terata, including all peloric types, can be explained by monogenic gain- or-loss-of-function mutants, changing either expression of a DEF-like or CYC-like gene. Supposed dominance or recessiveness of mutant alleles is correlated with the frequency of terata in both cultivation and nature. Our findings suggest that changes in DEF- and CYC-like genes not only underlie terata but also the natural diversity of orchid species. We argue, however, that true changes in organ identity are rare events in the evolution of orchid flowers, even though we review some likely cases.

Conclusions: The four DEF paralogues shaped floral diversity in orchids in a dramatic way by modularizing the floral perianth based on a complex series of sub- and neo-functionalization events. These genes may have eliminated constraints, so that different kinds of perianth organs could then evolve individually and thus often in dramatically different ways in response to selection by pollinators or by genetic drift. We therefore argue that floral diversity in orchids may be the result of an unprecedented developmental genetic predisposition that originated early in orchid evolution.

Key words: Orchidaceae, orchid evolution, evo-devo; perianth, class B genes, DEFICIENS, subfunctionalization, neofunctionalization, gene duplication, peloria, modularization


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.