Skip Navigation



AOBPreview published online on January 30, 2009

Annals of Botany, doi:10.1093/aob/mcp004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
104/3/457    most recent
mcp004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Neubig, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Pupulin, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Neubig, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Pupulin, F.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Neubig, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Pupulin, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Molecular phylogenetics and the evolution of fruit and leaf morphology of Dichaea (Orchidaceae: Zygopetalinae)

Kurt M. Neubig1,2,*, Norris H. Williams2, W. Mark Whitten2 and Franco Pupulin3

1 Department of Botany, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-8526, USA
2 Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, PO Box 117800, Gainesville, FL 32611-7800, USA
3 Jardín Botánico Lankester, Universidad de Costa Rica, Apartado 1031-7050 Cartago, Costa Rica

* For correspondence. E-mail kneubig{at}flmnh.ufl.edu

Received: 29 April 2008    Returned for revision: 8 July 2008    Accepted: 4 December 2008   

Background and Aims: The orchid genus Dichaea, with over 100 species found throughout the Neotropics, is easily recognized by distichous leaves on long stems without pseudobulbs and flowers with infrastigmatic ligules. The genus has previously been divided into four sections based primarily on presence of ovary bristles and a foliar abscission layer. The aim of this work is to use DNA sequence data to estimate phylogenetic relationships within Dichaea and map the distribution of major morphological characters that have been used to delimit subgenera/sections.

Methods: Sequence data for the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacers and plastid matK, trnL intron, trnL-F spacer and ycf1 for 67 ingroup and seven outgroup operational taxonomic units were used to estimate phylogenetic relationships within Dichaea. Taxa from each of the four sections were sampled, with the greatest representation from section Dichaea, the most diverse and taxonomically puzzling group.

Key Results: Molecular data and morphology support monophyly of Dichaea. Results indicate that section Dichaeopsis is polyphyletic and based on symplesiomorphies, including deciduous leaves and smooth ovaries that are widespread in Zygopetalinae. There are at least three well-supported clades within section Dichaeopsis. Section Pseudodichaea is monophyletic and defined by setose ovaries and leaves with an abscission layer. Sections Dichaea and Dichaeastrum are monophyletic and defined by pendent habit and persistent leaves. Section Dichaeastrum, distinguished from section Dichaea primarily by a glabrous ovary, is potentially polyphyletic.

Conclusions: The leaf abscission layer was lost once, occurring only in the derived sections Dichaea and Dichaeastrum. The setose fruit is a more homoplasious character with several losses and gains within the genus. We propose an informal division of the genus based upon five well-supported clades.

Key words: Dichaea, matK, nrITS, Orchidaceae, trnL intron, trnL-F spacer, ycf1, Zygopetalinae


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
M. F. Fay and M. W. Chase
Orchid biology: from Linnaeus via Darwin to the 21st century
Ann. Bot., August 1, 2009; 104(3): 359 - 364.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.