Skip Navigation

Erratum for Hunt and Colasanti, Ann Bot 99 (5) 1023-1034.
Annals of Botany 2007 100(3):677-678; doi:10.1093/aob/mcm176
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hunt, R.
Right arrow Articles by Colasanti, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hunt, R.
Right arrow Articles by Colasanti, R. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hunt, R.
Right arrow Articles by Colasanti, R. L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Self-assembling Plants and Integration across Ecological Scales

Roderick Hunt and R. L. Colasanti

Annals of Botany 99: 1023–1034, 2007

There were errors in the colour reproduction of Figs 7 and 8 in this article. The correct figures appear below. The publishers would like to apologize for these problems.


Figure 1
View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
  		FIG. 7. The standard model (yellow plant in view A, triangular symbols in graph B) was given a modification (red plant in A, square symbols in B) which affected the uptake of resources by its end modules. In the standard plant, continued existence of an end module was independent of resource uptake, but in the modified plant, existence became dependent upon continued resource uptake (from Colasanti and Hunt, 1997a).

 


Figure 2
View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
  		FIG. 8. Showing the effect of varying tap rooting strength in a bottom-replenished system with uniform distribution of water. The standard plant (data with closed symbols in A, typical image in B) has both a lower level of the tap-rooting ‘hormone’ and a lower root shape index than the modified plant (data with open symbols in A, and typical image in C) (from Colasanti et al., 2007).

 


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hunt, R.
Right arrow Articles by Colasanti, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hunt, R.
Right arrow Articles by Colasanti, R. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hunt, R.
Right arrow Articles by Colasanti, R. L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?