Skip Navigation


AOBPreview originally published online on September 5, 2007
Annals of Botany 2007 100(6):1209-1217; doi:10.1093/aob/mcm217
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/6/1209    most recent
mcm217v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De Vega, C.
Right arrow Articles by Talavera, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by De Vega, C.
Right arrow Articles by Talavera, S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by De Vega, C.
Right arrow Articles by Talavera, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The Endophytic System of Mediterranean Cytinus (Cytinaceae) Developing on Five Host Cistaceae Species

Clara De Vega*, Pedro Luis Ortiz, Montserrat Arista and Salvador Talavera

Departamento de Biología Vegetal y Ecología, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Sevilla, Apdo-1095, 41080 Sevilla, Spain

* For correspondence. E-mail cvega{at}us.es

Received: 28 May 2007    Returned for revision: 10 July 2007    Accepted: 20 July 2007    Published electronically: 5 September 2007


   ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUDING REMARKS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 LITERATURE CITED
 

Background and Aims: One of the most extreme manifestations of parasitism is found in the genus Cytinus, a holoparasite whose vegetative body is reduced to an endophytic system living within its host root. There are two species of Cytinus in the Mediterranean, C. hypocistis and C. ruber, which parasitize various genera of Cistaceae, one of the most characteristic families of the Mediterranean scrublands. The aim of this work is to describe the endophytic systems of C. hypocistis and C. ruber, and their tissue relationships with their host.

Methods: Roots from five different hosts infected with C. hypocistis and C. ruber were harvested, and examined by anatomical techniques under light microscopy to elucidate the characteristics of the endophytic system of Cytinus, and to determine if differences in endophytic systems occur between the two species and in response to different hosts.

Key Results: The endophyte structure is similar in both Cytinus species irrespective of the host species. In the initial stages of the endophyte, rows of parenchymal cells spread through the host pericyclic derivatives and phloem, and begin to generate small nodules in the outermost region of the host xylem. Later the nodules anastomose, and bands of parasitic tissue are formed. The host cambium continues to develop xylem tissue, and consequently the endophyte becomes enclosed within the xylem. The bands of parasitic tissue fuse to form a continuous sheath. This mature endophyte has well-developed vascular system with xylem and phloem, and forms sinkers with transfer cells that grow through the host xylem.

Conclusions: The endophytic system of Cytinus develops in all host root tissues and reaches its most mature stages in the host xylem. It is more complex than previously reported, showing parenchyma, xylem and phloem tissues. This is the first report of well-developed phloem in a holoparasitic endophytic species.

Key words: Cistaceae, Cytinaceae, Cytinus hypocistis, Cytinus ruber, endophyte, Mediterranean region, parasitic plant, sieve elements, sinker, transfer cell


   INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUDING REMARKS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 LITERATURE CITED
 
One of the most extreme manifestations of parasitism is found in the families of endoparasites Rafflesiaceae, Mitrastemonaceae, Apodanthaceae and Cytinaceae. These perennial plants, without chlorophyll, are obligate parasites, and depend on their hosts to obtain water and nutrients (Kuijt, 1969). All show a reduction in their morphological characters, with scale-like leaves and absence of external roots, and their vegetative body is reduced to a haustorial or endophytic system, often compared with that of a fungal plectenchyme. These endophytes live within the roots or stems of their hosts (Kuijt, 1969; Meijer, 1993), and emerge from the hosts only during the reproductive period, when the inflorescences arise. Because of this characteristic lifestyle, these endophytic holoparasites were long considered to constitute a single family, the Rafflesiaceae. However, differences in the morphology of flowers, ovaries and seeds, together with data from recent molecular phylogenetic studies, indicate that they are distinct families, even belonging to different orders (Bouman and Meijer, 1994; Barkman et al., 2004; Nickrent et al., 2004; Davis et al., 2007).

The structure of the haustorial system in these reduced endophytic holoparasites is poorly known, and there are detailed data only for the genus Pilostyles (Dell et al., 1982; Kuijt et al., 1985). The few existing data indicate that these endophytes are composed of parenchymal cells, with xylem elements being observed only occasionally (Fraysse, 1906; Kuijt, 1969; Dell et al., 1982; Forstmeier et al., 1983; Kuijt et al., 1985). Functional phloem has never been observed in the endophytes of these families studied to date, although Kuijt et al. (1985) have described a vestigial phloem tissue in Pilostyles thurberi (Apodanthaceae). Within the host, the endophytic system can grow intercellularly between the cambial zone and the phloem (Mitrastemonaceae), through the cambial zone (Rafflesiaceae, Apodanthaceae), through the phloem (Apodanthaceae), or between the cambial zone and the xylem (Cytinaceae) (Kuijt, 1969; Meijer and Schlauer, 2002).

The distribution of the families of the holoparasitic endophytes is mainly tropical or subtropical (Molau, 1995), and in the Mediterranean region there are only two species, Cytinus hypocistis and Cytinus ruber (Cytinaceae) both of which parasitize exclusively roots of Cistaceae, one of the most characteristic families of shrubs in the Mediterranean flora. Cytinus hypocistis has yellow flowers and parasitizes white or yellow-flowered Cistus, Halimium, Helianthemum, while C. ruber has white or pinkish-white flowers and parasitizes pink-flowered Cistus. Although Mediterranean Cytinus have been known since ancient times, and even mentioned by Teofrasto (Villar, 1997), their life cycle, floral biology, process of infection, and relationhips with the hosts remain practically unknown. The anatomy of the endophytic system of C. ruber is unknown and that of C. hypocistis poorly documented, with almost all the existing studies going back a century or more, e.g. Solms-Laubach (1867); Fraysse (1906); and also Forstmeier et al. (1983). The aim of this work is to describe the endophytic system of C. hypocistis and C. ruber, and examine the relationships they establish with the host tissues. Moreover, given that the endophytes of some parasitic plants can adopt different forms depending on the host they parasitize (Thoday, 1960, 1963), the development of the endophyte of Cytinus was studied on five of its most common host species. This work falls within a broad study on the Mediterranean Cytinus which has shown that their taxonomic status is uncertain, since genetic races or cryptic species defined by host identity seem to exist (C. de Vega, unpubl. res.). However, in the absence of a new recognized classification, the two traditionally recognized species, C. hypocistis and C. ruber, are dealt with here.


   MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUDING REMARKS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Cytinus hypocistis (L.) L. and C. ruber (Fourr.) Fritsch. are perennial holoparasites that appear exclusively on roots of Cistaceae species. The vegetative body of both parasites is contained entirely within the root of their host plants, and only in spring do the inflorescences burst through the host tissues. According to Heinricher (1917) the developmental time for Cytinus to produce an inflorescence requires over 3 years.

Roots of Cistus albidus L. infected with Cytinus ruber, and roots of Cistus ladanifer L., Cistus salviifolius L., Halimium halimifolium (L.) Willk. and Halimium ocymoides (Lam.) Willk., infected with Cytinus hypocistis, were collected from natural populations in south-west Spain. Root collection was made during the flowering of Cytinus, given that infestation is apparent only in this period.

Small pieces of these roots were fixed in 4 % glutaraldehyde in 0·1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7·0, for approx. 1 d at room temperature, and further incubated in a vacuum oven for 1 h at room temperature to improve the fixation. The tissues were subsequently dehydrated in an ethanol series, embedded in Historesin (glycol methacrylate; Leica, Heidelberg), and serially sectioned at 2–4 µm, using a rotary microtome. Sections were stained with 0·12 % toluidine blue and 0·05 % basic fuschin (Junqueira, 1990), and mounted with Eukitt (Kindler, Freiburg, Germany). For observation of sieve elements, sections were stained with 0·05 % aniline blue in 0·05 M phosphate buffer (pH 8·5) and then examined under a fluorescence microscope. Under these conditions, sieve tubes were visible due to fluorescent callose deposits.

All images were taken with a Leica DC300 camera attached to a Zeiss Axiophot light microscope. Voucher specimens of the host plants were deposited in the herbarium of the University of Seville.


   RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUDING REMARKS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Macroscopic morphology of the infection
Year after year, Cytinus inflorescences burst through the same zone of the host root (observations made in 50 populations over 5 years). Thus, a ‘reproductive zone’ of Cytinus on the host root can be referred to, that is generally found very close to the trunk. On the infected roots, both isolated inflorescences of Cytinus and groups of up to 22 inflorescences may occur on a relatively small portion of the root (Fig. 1A). Around the zone of emergence of each inflorescence a cup-shaped structure is formed that originates from host tissue that ruptures, enabling the inflorescence to exit (Fig. 1B). These structures remain as permanent scars on the roots.


Figure 1
View larger version (134K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
FIG. 1. (A) Inflorescences of Cytinus ruber emerging from a root of Cistus albidus. (B) Detail of the scars left by previous inflorescences of Cytinus hypocistis on a root of Cistus salviifolius.

 
Structure of the endophytic system and relationships with the host tissues
The anatomical structure of the roots of the five species of Cistaceae studied is similar, showing the typical characteristics of dicotyledonous secondary roots. The outermost layer of the root is a periderm, and internally a large zone of pericyclic derivatives with abundant fibres and scarce intercellular spaces is found. The phloem does not show fibres or sclereids, and appears separated from the xylem by a narrow cambial zone. The xylem occupies the greater part of the root, and the vascular elements are heterogeneous in size.

The development and structure of the endophytic system of Cytinus are similar in both species studied in their five host species. Thus, the following description is general, and independent of the host being parasitized. The endophytic system of Cytinus grows in all the tissues of the host roots, although it reaches the most mature and complex stages in the host xylem. In the initial stages, parenchymal cells of the parasite are observed growing intercellularly among the pericyclic and phloem cells of the host. These parenchymal cells form single-rowed filaments that spread tangentially through the pericyclic tissues and phloem of the host, and radially towards the centre of the root (Fig. 2A, B). The parenchymal cells of Cytinus are easily distinguished from those of the host by their large nuclei and thickened walls (Fig. 2B). When these parasitic radial filaments cross the host cambial zone, they begin to generate small nodules of parasitic tissue in the outermost region of the host xylem, contiguous with the cambial zone (Fig. 2C). Initially, these nodules have only parenchymal cells recognizable by their dense cytoplasm, which stains intensely (Fig. 2C). However, they soon thicken, and appear as a differentiated central cambial zone surrounded by parenchyma tissue (Fig. 2D). As the nodules anastomose, bands of parasitic tissue are formed (Fig. 2D). These bands show a clear differentiation of two layers of parenchymal tissue enveloping a central cambial zone (Fig. 2D). As the host cambium continues its activity, producing xylem inwardly, the endophyte bands at this stage are separated from the host cambial zone by its xylem, but connections are maintained with the radial filaments from which the nodules originated (Fig. 2D). As the endophyte bands separate from the host cambial zone, the parasite cambium begins to form vascular tissues, with phloem externally and xylem internally, and the number of cell strata in the parenchymal layers increases (Fig. 2E). The sieve elements of the endophyte are larger than those of the host, and are more scattered (Fig. 3A, B). As observed under fluorescence, no direct connections were seen between the phloem of the endophyte and that of the host. The sieve elements of the endophyte are long, with thin walls, and a weakly staining cytoplasm lacking a nucleus. The simple sieve plates found in the cross-walls of Cytinus sieve elements are easily observed with fluorescence microscopy, after staining with aniline blue, as are its lateral sieve areas (Fig. 3C, D). The elements of the endophytic xylem vessels have walls with reticulated or helicoidal secondary thickening (Fig. 3E and F, respectively).


Figure 2
View larger version (155K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
FIG. 2. Different stages in the development of the endophytic system of Cytinus hypocistis and C. ruber. (A) Cross-section of a root of Cistus salviifolius. Arrows indicate the parasitic tissue. (B) Magnification of the area marked in red in (A), with the tissue of C. hypocistis coloured pink. Note the parasitic cells crossing the host pericyclic tissues and phloem. These cells are easily distinguished from those of the host by their great size and large nucleus. (C) Cross-section of a root of C. salviifolius with nodules of the endophyte in different stages of development. In the nodule on the right there are intensely stained parenchymal cells (arrowhead) and a cambial zone (arrow). (D) Cross-section of a root of C. salviifolius, showing an endophytic band embedded in the host xylem, formed by a cambial zone bounded externally and internally by layers of parenchyma (arrows). Arrowheads indicate radial rows of endophyte cells. (E) Cross-section of a root of C. albidus, showing a mature stage of the endophyte in the host xylem. In the central zone of the endophyte a cambial zone can be seen, and phloem and xylem vascular tissues. The arrows indicate sinkers. Abbreviations: HPe, host pericyclic tissues; HCa, Host cambial zone; HP, host phloem; HX, host xylem; PC, parasite cambial zone; PP, parasite phloem; PX, parasite xylem. Scale bars: A = 200 µm; B–D = 50 µm; E = 100 µm.

 


Figure 3
View larger version (114K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
FIG. 3. (A–F) Vascular tissues of the endophytic system of Cytinus hypocistis and C. ruber. (A) Longitudinal section of a root of Cistus ladanifer infected by C. hypocistis, under normal light. (B) The same section, under fluorescence, showing the phloem of C. hypocistis (white arrows), oriented perpendicular to that of the host (black arrows). (C) Detail of sieve tubes of (B), showing the sieve plates of C. hypocistis. (D) Detail of sieve elements of C. hypocistis on Halimium halimifolium, showing the sieve plates and lateral sieve areas (arrows). (E) Detail of the xylem vessels of C. ruber on Cistus albidus, showing the secondary reticulated thickening of the cell wall. (F) Detail of the xylem vessels of C. ruber on Cistus albidus, showing the secondary helicoidal thickening of the cell wall. (G–I) Mature stages in development of C. hypocistis. (G) Cross-section of a root of Halimium ocymoides, showing the formation of new endophytic nodules (arrows) and, below, a band of older parasite tissue (arrowhead). (H) Cross-section of a root of C. salviifolius with various strata of the endophytic system of C. hypocistis alternating with host xylem. The arrows indicate the radial rows of endophyte cells. (I) Very advanced stage of the infection of C. hypocistis observed in a cross-section of a root of C. salviifolius: the endophyte forms a continuous sheath embedded in the host xylem. The arrows indicate the radial rows of endophyte cells and the arrowheads the sinkers in the host xylem. Abbreviations: HPe, host pericyclic tissues; HP, host phloem; HX, host xylem; PPa, parasite parenchyma. Scale bars: A, B, G = 100 µm; C, E, F = 10 µm; D = 5 µm; H, I = 200 µm.

 
As the cambium of the host deposits new layers of xylem on the parasitic tissue, the endophytic tissue becomes progressively more deeply embedded in the host xylem the older the endophyte. At this stage, nodules formed under the host cambial zone begin to form new endophyte bands (Fig. 3G). The repetition of this process gives raise to alternate strata of parasitic and host tissues (Fig. 3H). As the bands of endophyte become encapsulated within the host xylem, they fuse to form a continuous sheath (Fig. 3I).

Even before the endophyte forms this sheath, radial processes, called sinkers (Kuijt, 1977), also begin to differentiate from the parasite cambial zone. The sinkers increased in length with growth from the endophyte cambial zone, and they seem to develop in conjunction with xylem development. A sinker is generally single-rowed (Fig. 4A) and extends through intercellular spaces until it encounters mature host xylem where its terminal cell wedges itself between xylem cells given rise to a pointed end (Fig. 4B, C). The sinkers are generally formed of thick-walled parenchymal cells and where these cells are contiguous with host vessels the wall is thickest against the vessel (Fig. 4D). These parenchyma cells may have differentially thickened walls that occur in contact with host vessels (Fig. 4E), and so they can be considered as transfer cells, particularly since such thickening of the sinker walls is absent when they are abutting host fibres and parenchyma. Occasionally isolated xylem cells of the parasite are intercalated between sinker parenchymal cells, but they are easily recognizable by their helicoidal thickenings and by their radial growth in the root (Fig. 4F). In no case were phloem elements detected in the sinkers. Sometimes a sinker seems to invade the elements of the host xylem vessels, penetrating into their lumen and crossing several successively (Fig. 4G–I).


Figure 4
View larger version (126K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
FIG. 4. (A–H) Structure and development of the sinkers of Cytinus hypocistis and C. ruber. (A) Detail of C. ruber on Cistus albidus in a cross-section, showing sinkers (arrows) being formed from the cambial zone of endophyte bands growing among the host xylem. (B) Sinkers of C. hypocistis invading the xylem of Halimium halimifolium, in a cross-section. (C) Detail of sinkers of C. hypocistis, with thick cell walls and pointed apical cells (arrows), in the xylem of Halimium ocymoides. (D, E) Sinkers of C. hypocistis on H. halimifolium. Note the presence of thick accumulations of wall material (D) and differently thickened walls (E) in sinkers cells abutting host vessel elements (arrows). (F) Detail of a uniseriate sinker of C. hypocistis in the xylem of H. ocymoides, showing a vascular element (arrow) between two parenchymal cells (arrowheads). (G) Longitudinal section of the xylem of H. halimifolium thoroughly permeated by sinkers of C. hypocistis with cells having a large nucleus. (H) Longitudinal section of the xylem of H. halimifolium, showing a sinker of C. hypocistis (arrow) that seems to invade two vascular elements of the host. (I) Longitudinal section of the xylem of H. halimifolium with sinkers of C. hypocistis (arrows) that seems to penetrate the host vessels. (J–N) Details of the endophyte of Cytinus hypocistis and C. ruber forming flower buds. (J) Cross-section of a root of Cistus albidus, showing the growth of the endophyte to form the inflorescence. (K) Detail of the large nuclei of the endophyte cells from which the floral buds of C. hypocistis originate, in a longitudinal section of a root of C. salviifolius. (L) Magnification of the marked area in (J) showing a parenchyma composed of long cells and vascular tissues (arrow). (M) Magnification of the marked area in (L) showing xylem and phloem. In the xylem, the helicoidal thickenings of the walls can be observed, and in the phloem, the sieve elements (arrows) and their associated parenchyma are evident. (N) Detail of the phloem, under fluorescence, of a floral bud of C. hypocistis on Cistus ladanifer, showing sieve cells with a large amount of callose on their sieve plates. Abbreviations: HPe, host pericyclic tissues; HP, host phloem; HX, host xylem; PE, endophytic system of Cytinus; PI, parasite inflorescence; PP, parasite phloem; PPa, parasite parenchyma; PX, parasite xylem. Scale bars: A, B, G, H, I, L, N = 50 µm; C, E, F, K, M = 20 µm; D = 10 µm; J = 500 µm.

 
In the flowering period of Cytinus, the mature endophyte grows towards the outside of the host root, causing a massive distortion in its tissues, to form the inflorescence (Fig. 4J). From the continuous sheath of the endophyte, the bud from which the inflorescence originates begins to develop, formed by elongated parenchymal cells with very large nuclei (Fig. 4K, L) and by vascular filaments arranged cylindrically close to the periphery (Fig. 4L–N). Each vascular filament consists of xylem on its inner face and phloem on the outer (Fig. 4M). The phloem tissue of the inflorescences includes sieve elements similar to those described above, and associated parenchymatic cells (Fig. 4M, N). The latter are easily distinguishable because of their intensely stained protoplasts, their large nuclei, and their position beside the sieve elements.


   DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUDING REMARKS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 LITERATURE CITED
 
The endophytic systems of Cytinus ruber and C. hypocistis are alike, and develop similarly irrespective of the host parasitized. The endophytic system of these species produces lateral filaments that extend tangentially through the pericyclic derivatives and phloem of the root host. At the same time, this endophyte grows radially, crossing the cambial zone of the host and colonizing its xylem region. Thus, the endophytic system of both species of Cytinus grows in all the host root tissues. Most endophytic holoparasites develop only in the host cortex and the outermost zone of the phloem (Brown, 1912; Kuijt, 1969; Rutherford, 1970; Kuijt et al., 1985), and only in Pilostyles hamiltonii (Apodanthaceae) do some cellular filaments of the endophyte penetrate into the xylem (Dell et al., 1982). In contrast, the endophyte of Cytinus reaches its highest degree of complexity in the root xylem of its hosts. This type of development has not been reported previously in any species of holoparasitic endophyte. The fact that nodules of Cytinus develop in the cambial zone and grow non-intrusively into the xylem raises the possibility of a developmentally synchronized growth of Cytinus and its host, as has been reported in other parasites (Srivastava and Esau, 1961; Lye, 2006).

One of the most important findings of the present study is the detection of well-developed phloem in the endophyte of Cytinus, with companion cells and sieve elements similar to those of the autotrophic angiosperms. Previously it had been reported that the endophyte of C. hypocistis comprised only a cortical outer layer, a cambial zone, and a medullary inner layer with xylem conductive elements (Solms- Laubach, 1867; Fraysse, 1906; Forstmeier et al., 1983). This was probably because fluorescence was not used in those studies and, despite the size of the phloem elements, they are barely perceptible without this technique (see Fig. 3A and B). Likewise, phloem has not been reported previously in any of the studies carried out on species of Hydnoraceae, Mistratemonaceae or Rafflesiaceae. Sieve elements were detected in Pilostyles turberi (Apodanthaceae; Kuijt et al., 1985), but they were classed as a vestigial tissue. This study of Cytinus species is the first time that the presence of well-developed phloem has been reported in a holoparasitic endophyte species. Moreover, reports of sieve elements in holoparasitic species whose vegetative bodies mainly develop outside the host are few, e.g. Orobanche (Dörr and Kollmann, 1975, 1995), Epifagus (Walsh and Popovich, 1977) and Aeginetia (Rajanna et al., 2005), although the existence of phloem in hemiparasitic angiosperms has been documented on many occasions (for reviews, see Kuijt, 1977; Bhandari and Mukerji, 1993). Direct contact was not detected between the phloem of Cytinus and that of the host, a type of contact infrequent in other parasites (Tate, 1925; Dörr, 1972; Dörr and Kollmann, 1995; Birschwilks et al., 2006).

The endophyte of Cytinus produces sinkers that thoroughly permeated the host xylem, parallel to the xylem rays but not associated with them. In contrast, the sinkers of many hemi- and holoparasites grow closely associated with the host medullary rays (e.g. Cohen, 1954; Srivastava and Esau, 1961, Rutherford, 1970). It has been reported that the sinkers of C. hypocistis were comprised solely of parenchymal tissue (Fraysse, 1906; Forstmeier et al., 1983), as in other endophytic holoparasite species (Rutherford, 1970; Dell et al., 1982; Kuijt et al., 1985). In this work, it has been observed that the sinkers of both species of Cytinus also have tracheal elements like those seen in hemiparasitic angiosperms (e.g. Srivastava and Esau, 1961; Sallé, 1979). Despite the tracheal elements detected in the sinkers of Cytinus, no direct parasite xylem–host xylem contact was observed. Nor were contacts observed between the xylem of the mature endophyte bands of Cytinus and the host xylem. This seems to be a common circumstance, because although xylem–xylem contacts have been reported in other parasitic angiosperms (e.g. Calvin, 1967; Kuijt, 1977; Sallé, 1979; Heide-Jørgensen and Kuijt, 1995; Pate, 1995; Calladine and Pate, 2000), a luminal continuity was actually seen in very few cases (e.g. Pate et al., 1990; Dörr, 1997).

Thus, in Cytinus, direct xylem–xylem or phloem–phloem contacts have not been observed. It has been proposed that the transfer of nutrients between parasitic plants and hosts involves the parenchymal cell walls of the haustorium, which could act as transfer cells, forming an apoplastic continuum between the cells of the parasite and those of the host (Coetzee and Fineran, 1987; Kuo et al., 1989; Gedalovich-Shedletzky and Kuijt, 1990; Heide-Jørgensen and Kuijt, 1993; Pate, 1995). Transfer cells occur in most angiosperms, both parasitic and non-parasitic, and they have a central role in nutrient distribution, facilitating the apo-symplastic transport of solutes (Fineran and Calvin, 2000; Christensen et al., 2003; Offler et al., 2003). Contacts between the endophyte of Cytinus and its host also seem to occur via parenchymal cells. The parenchyma cells of the bands and sinkers with thickened walls may act as transfer cells and, if so, they would play a crucial physiological role in the host–parasite interface, facilitating the absorption, transport and distribution of photoassimilates from host to parasite. The development of differentially thickened walls in the parenchyma cells of the sinkers contiguous with vessels of the host xylem suggests an active loading of water and solutes by Cytinus from its host. Furthermore, it is possible that the cells of the endophyte of Cytinus situated among the host phloem cells capture photoassimilates from them. Subsequently, the metabolites acquired could be transported, either symplastically or apoplastically, from the portion of the endophyte situated in the pericyclic tissues and phloem of the host, via sinkers, to the bands of mature endophytic tissue embedded in the host xylem. Thus, although the host tends to enclose Cytinus in its xylem, the parasite may achieve its nutrient requirements because of these connections.

Occasionally sinkers of Cytinus appear to penetrate the host xylem cells. An intrusion of the sinkers into the host xylem vessels has also been reported in other parasitic angiosperms (Kuijt, 1977; Dörr, 1997; Calladine and Pate, 2000), and it has been postulated that this penetration might be produced by both mechanical pressure and enzymatic activity (Press and Whittaker, 1993; Dörr, 1997). Such intrusive sinkers of Cytinus could take water and mineral nutrients from the host, although this uptake would be prevented if host vessels were occluded by tyloses. Tylosis formation is considered a normal phenomenon in many species but it can also be induced by mechanical injury and by diseases (Fahn, 1977). In fact, Fraysse (1906) found tyloses in roots of Cistaceae infected with C. hypocistis. However, tyloses were not observed in vessels contiguous with sinkers cells in any of the material used in the present study.

Finally, for the first time, continuity has been demonstrated here between the vascular tissues (xylem and phloem) of the endophyte of Cytinus and those of its inflorescences, ensuring the flow of water and nutrients necessary for flowering and fruiting. Although holoparasitic angiosperms lack chlorophyll, and need to obtain water and nutrients from their hosts, they sometimes show a small capacity to assimilate carbon independently of the host (Renaudin et al., 1982, 1984; Rey et al., 1985; Stewart and Press, 1990). Thalouarn et al. (1986), using radioisotope techniques, have demonstrated that inflorescences of C. hypocistis detached from the host are capable of non-photosynthetic carboxylation using external CO2 in small amounts – up to 12 % of the carbon received from the host. Thus, C. hypocistis may obtain from its inflorescences, extra nutrients that qualitatively complement those supplied by the host, and which can be easily transported thanks to the continuity of the conductive elements described in this work.


   CONCLUDING REMARKS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUDING REMARKS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 LITERATURE CITED
 
The endophytic system described for both species of Cytinus is more complex and extends deeper into the host tissues than previously reported. The endophytic system grows in all host root tissues, the youngest tissues being located in the host pericyclic tissues and phloem and the oldest tissues in the host xylem, with connections being established between the different developmental stages of parasitic tissues by means of sinkers. The mature endophytic system has a well-developed vascular system with xylem and functional phloem. The latter, as observed in Cytinus, is described for the first time in any member of endophytic, holoparasitic parasite. Sinkers formed from the mature endophyte grow through the host xylem, and their cells with thickened walls may act as transfer cells. Although the current study presents a number of very novel features of the endophytic system of Cytinus, little is known still about its relationship with the host species from the first stages of development. Since seed germination has never been observed in any of the families of endophytic holoparasitic plants, the initial establishment and development of Cytinus on the roots of its host species remains an open and exciting question.


   ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUDING REMARKS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 LITERATURE CITED
 
We thank Dr R. G. Albaladejo for help with the field sampling, Dr D. G. Simão and Dr R. Carmo-Oliveira for technical assistance and Dr P. E. Gibbs for checking the English text. This study was carried out in the Laboratory of Morphology, Microscopy and Image Processing of the Institute of Biology-UFU, MG, Brazil. This work was supported by a PhD grant from the Spanish MEC to C. de Vega and by two projects from the Spanish CICYT (REN2002-04354-C02-02 and CGL 2005-01951).


   LITERATURE CITED
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUDING REMARKS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 LITERATURE CITED
 

    Barkman TJ, Lim SH, Salleh M, Nais J. Mitochondrial DNA sequences reveal the photosynthetic relatives of Rafflesia, the world's largest flower. Proceedings of the National Academic of Sciences of the USA (2004) 101:787–792.[CrossRef]

    Bhandari NN, Mukerji RG. The haustorium (1993) New York, NY: Research Studies Press Ltd. John Wiley and Sons.

    Birschwilks M, Haupt S, Hofius D, Neumann S. Transfer of phloem-mobile substances from the host plants to the holoparasite Cuscuta sp. Journal of Experimental Botany (2006) 57:911–921.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Bouman F, Meijer W. Comparative structure of ovules and seeds in Rafflesiaceae. Plant Systematics and Evolution (1994) 193:187–212.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

    Brown WH. The relation of Rafflesia manillana to its host. Philippine Journal of Sciences (1912) 7:209–226.

    Calladine A, Pate JS. Haustorial structure and functioning of the root hemiparasitic tree Nuytsia floribunda (Labill.) R.Br. and water relationships with its hosts. Annals of Botany (2000) 85:723–731.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Calvin CL. Anatomy of the endophytic system of the mistletoe. Phoradendron flavescens. Botanical Gazette (1967) 128:117–137.[CrossRef]

    Christensen NM, Dörr I, van der Kooij TAW, Schulz A. Development of Cuscuta species on partially incompatible hosts: induction of xylem transfer cells. Protoplasma (2003) 220:131–142.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Coetzee J, Fineran BA. The apoplastic continuum, nutrient absorption and plasma tubules in the dwarf mistletoe Korthalsella lindsayi (Viscaceae). Protoplasma (1987) 136:145–153.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

    Cohen LI. The anatomy of the endophytic system of the dwarf mistletoe, Arceuthobium campylopodum. American Journal of Botany (1954) 41:840–847.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

    Davis CC, Latvis M, Nickrent DL, Wurdack KJ, Baum DA. Floral gigantism in Rafflesiaceae. (2007) (17 January 2007). http://www.sciencexpress.org.

    Dell B, Kuo J, Burbidge H. Anatomy of Pilostyles hamiltonii C.A. Gardner (Rafflesiaceae) in stems of Daviesia. Australian Journal of Botany (1982) 30:1–9.[Medline]

    Dörr I. Der Anschluß der Cuscuta-Hyphen an die Siebröhren ihrer Wirtspflanzen. Protoplasma (1972) 75:167–184.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

    Dörr I. How Striga parasitizes its host: a TEM and SEM study. Annals of Botany (1997) 79:463–472.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Dörr I, Kollmann R. Strukturelle Grundlagen des Parasitismus bei Orobanche. II. Die Differenzierung der Assimilat-Leitungsbahn im Haustorialgewebe. Protoplasma (1975) 83:185–199.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

    Dörr I, Kollmann R. Symplasmic sieve element continuity between Orobanche and its host. Botanica Acta (1995) 108:47–55.[Web of Science]

    Fahn A. Plant anatomy (1977) 2nd edn. London: Pergamon.

    Fineran BA, Calvin CL. Transfer cells and flange cells in sinkers of the mistletoe Phoradendron macrophyllum (Viscaceae), and their novel combination. Protoplasma (2000) 211:76–93.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

    Forstmeier L, Weberling F, Weber HC. Zum Parasitismus von Cytinus hypocistis L. (Rafflesiaceae). Beiträge zur Biologie der Pflanzen (1983) 58:299–311.

    Fraysse A. Contribution à la biologie des plantes Phanérogames parasites (1906) Sociéte anonyme de l'Imprimerie générale du Midi. Montpellier.

    Gedalovich-Shedletzky E, Kuijt J. An ultrastructural study of the tuber strands of Balanophora (Balanophoraceae). Canadian Journal of Botany (1990) 68:1271–1279.

    Heide-Jørgensen HS, Kuijt J. Epidermal derivatives as xylem elements and transfer cells: a study of the host–parasite interface in two species of Triphysaria (Scrophulariaceae). Protoplasma (1993) 174:173–183.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

    Heide-Jørgensen HS, Kuijt J. The haustorium of the root parasite Triphysaria (Scrophulariaceae), with special reference to xylem bridge ultrastructure. American Journal of Botany (1995) 82:782–797.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

    Heinricher E. Zur Kenntnis der Blüte von Cytinus hypocistis L. Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft (1917) 35:513–517.

    Junqueira CU. O uso de cortes finos de tecidos na medicina e biologia. Meios and Métodos (1990) 66:167–171.

    Kuijt J. The biology of parasitic flowering plants (1969) Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Kuijt J. Haustoria of phanerogamic parasites. Annual Review of Phytopathology (1977) 15:91–118.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

    Kuijt J, Bray D, Olson AR. Anatomy and ultrastructure of the endophytic system of Pilostyles thurberi (Rafflesiaceae). Canadian Journal of Botany (1985) 63:1231–1240.

    Kuo J, Pate JS, Davidson NJ. Ultrastructure of the haustorial interface and apoplastic continuum between host and the root hemiparasite Olax phyllanthi (Labill.) R. Br. (Olacaceae). Protoplasma (1989) 150:27–39.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

    Lye D. Charting the isophasic endophyte of dwarf mistletoe Arcevthobium douglasii C Viscaceae) in hostapical buds. Annals of Botany (2006) 97:953–963.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Meijer W. Rafflesiaceae. In: The families and genera of vascular plants—Kubitzki K, Rohwer JG, Bittrich V, eds. (1993) II. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. 557–563.

    Meijer W, Schlauer J. Rafflesiaceae. In: Plantas Parásitas de la Península Ibérica e Islas Baleares—López-Sáez JA, Catalán P, Sáez LL, eds. (2002) Madrid: Ediciones Mundi Prensa. 153–159.

    Molau U. Reproductive ecology and biology. In: Parasitic plants—Press MC, Graves JD, eds. (1995) London: Chapman and Hall. 141–177.

    Nickrent DL, Blarer A, Qiu YL, Vidal-Russell R, Anderson FE. Phylogenetic inference in Rafflesiales: the influence of rate heterogeneity and horizontal gene transfer. BMC Evolutionary Biology (2004) 4:40–56.[CrossRef][Medline]

    Offler CE, McCurdy DW, Patrick JW, Talbot MJ. Transfer cells: cells specialized for a special purpose. Annual Review of Plant Biology (2003) 54:431–454.[CrossRef][Medline]

    Pate JS. Mineral relationships of parasites and their hosts. In: Parasitic plants—Press MC, Graves JD, eds. (1995) London: Chapman and Hall. 80–102.

    Pate JS, Kuo J, Davidson NJ. Morphology and anatomy of the haustorium of the root hemiparasite Olax phyllanthi (Olacaceae) with special reference to the haustorial interface. Annals of Botany (1990) 65:425–436.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Press MC, Whittaker JB. Exploitation of the xylem stream by parasitic organisms. Philosophical Transactions Biological Sciences (1993) 341:101–111.[CrossRef]

    Rajanna L, Shivamurthy GR, Niranjana R, Vijay CR. Occurrence of phloem in the haustorium of Aeginetia pedunculata Wall. – a root holoparasite of Orobanchaceae. Taiwania (2005) 50:109–116.

    Renaudin S, Vidal J, Larher F. Characterization of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase in a range of parasitic phanerogames. Zeitschrift fur Pflanzenphysiologie (1982) 106:229–237.[Web of Science]

    Renaudin S, Thalouarn P, Rey L, Lahrer F, Vidal J. Phosphoenol-pyruvate carboxylase in parasitic plants: further characterization in various species and localization at the tissular and cellular levels in Lathraea clandestina L. Journal of Plant Physiology (1984) 116:455–465.[Web of Science]

    Rey L, Renaudin S, Thalouarn P. The incorporation of 14CO2 in the organic substances of the holoparasitic Scrophulariaceae Lathraea clandestina L. separated from its host. Journal of Plant Physiology (1985) 120:267–272.[Web of Science]

    Rutherford RJ. The anatomy and cytology of Pilostyles thurberi Gray (Rafflesiaceae). Aliso (1970) 7:263–288.

    Sallé GC. Le système endophytique du Viscum album: anatomie et fonctionnement des suçoirs secondaires. Canadian Journal of Botany (1979) 57:435–449.

    Solms-Laubach H. über den Bau und die Entwicklung der Ernährungsorgane parasitischer Phanerogamen. Jahrbuch für wissenschaftliche Botanik (1867) 6:509–638.

    Srivastava LM, Esau K. Relation of dwarf mistletoe (Arceuthobium) to the xylem tissue of conifers. I. Anatomy of parasite sinkers and their connection with host xylem. American Journal of Botany (1961) 48:159–167.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

    Stewart GR, Press MC. The physiology and biochemistry of parasitic angiosperms. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology (1990) 41:127–151.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

    Tate P. On the anatomy of Orobanche hederae Duby, and its attachment to the host. New Phytologist (1925) 24:284–293.[CrossRef]

    Thalouarn P, Rey L, Renaudin S. Carbon nutrition in a Rafflesiaceae holoparasitic Cytinus hypocistis L. fixed on, or experimentally isolated from the host Cistus monspeliensis. Journal of Plant Physiology (1986) 123:271–281.[Web of Science]

    Thoday D. Modes of union and interaction between parasite and host in the Loranthaceae. V. Some South African Loranthoideae. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences (1960) 152:143–162.

    Thoday D. Modes of union and interaction between parasite and host in the Loranthaceae. VII. Some Australian Loranthoideae with exceptional features. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences (1963) 157:507–516.

    Villar L. Cytinus. In: Flora Ibérica. Plantas vasculares de la Península Ibérica e Islas Baleares—Castroviejo S, Aedo C, Benedí C, Laínz M, Muñoz Garmendia F, Nieto Feliner G, eds. (1997) III. Madrid: Real Jardín Botánico de Madrid, CSIC. 170–174.

    Walsh MA, Popovich TM. Some ultrastructural aspects of metaphloem sieve elements in the aerial stem of the holoparasitic angiosperm Epifagus virginiana (Orobanchaceae). American Journal of Botany (1977) 64:326–336.[CrossRef][Web of Science]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
C. de Vega, M. Arista, P. L. Ortiz, C. M. Herrera, and S. Talavera
The ant-pollination system of Cytinus hypocistis (Cytinaceae), a Mediterranean root holoparasite
Ann. Bot., May 1, 2009; 103(7): 1065 - 1075.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/6/1209    most recent
mcm217v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De Vega, C.
Right arrow Articles by Talavera, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by De Vega, C.
Right arrow Articles by Talavera, S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by De Vega, C.
Right arrow Articles by Talavera, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?