Skip Navigation

Annals of Botany 2008 101(8):NP; doi:10.1093/aob/mcn066
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Ann Bot
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

ContentSnapshots

Plant growth modelling and applications (Viewpoint)


Figure 1
Modelling plant growth allows the testing of hypotheses and simulation of experiments that could otherwise take years in field conditions. Fourcaud et al. (pp. 1053–1063) propose that plant architecture and sink activity should be pushed to the centre of plant growth models.

Models for forest ecosystem management: a European perspective (Review)


Figure 2
Growth models are the most innovative planning tools available. They integrate system knowledge and scale it to levels relevant for management. Pretzsch et al. (pp. 1065–1087) identify five different paradigms, assess models suitable for goal setting or decision support, and develop guidelines for practical operation.

Modelling carbohydrate allocation to defence-related metabolites


Figure 3
Variation in the concentrations of defence-related metabolites depends on internal source and sink strengths for carbon and nitrogen. Gayler et al. (pp. 1089–1098) use the plant growth model PLATHO to simulate the dynamics of carbohydrate allocation to secondary compounds and present model equations and simulation results for juvenile apple, beech and spruce.

Sink functions of wheat organs derived from GREENLAB model


Figure 4
The functional–structural plant model GREENLAB is calibrated for wheat by Kang et al. (pp. 1099–1108). They fit model outputs to measured mass of roots, leaf parts, internodes and ears of tillers and main stems at four sampling stages. The resulting parameters give sink functions of the various organs.

Combined rule-based model of morphogenesis, shading and hormone signal transduction


Figure 5
Using an interactive modelling platform, Buck-Sorlin et al. (pp. 1109–1123) integrate different models combining gibberellic acid signal transduction, phytochrome-based shade detection and object avoidance in barley at different hierarchical scales. The outcome shows the suitability of this new formalism for multi-scaled functional–structural plant modelling.

AmapSim: a structural plant architecture simulator designed to host external functional models


Figure 6
This model and related software include botanical knowledge to simulate realistic plant shapes. A specific software open interface designed by Barczi et al. (pp. 1125–1138) allows the growth engine to be optionally driven by functional computing that is plugged into it.

A 3-D virtual model estimates light capture in sunflower


Figure 7
Light capture at organ, plant and plot levels is estimated by characterizing the light environment and using 3-D virtual plants built from plant architectural characteristics (Rey et al., pp. 1139–1151). Blades and the capitulum are shown as major contributors to light interception while contributions of petioles, stem or by heliotropism are negligible.

Light-foraging efficiency of low-density cotton


Figure 8
How plants forage for light is addressed by Dauzat et al. (pp. 1153–1166) using 3-D virtual plants reconstructed from field experiments planted at 1, 2 or 4 plants m–2. These plants optimize light capture through photomorphogenetic responses but produce leaf area in proportion to intercepted light in a manner similar for all densities.

Modelling grapevine canopy structure


Figure 9
Based on simple field measurements, Louarn et al. (pp. 1167–1184) describe and validate a statistical model for reconstructing 3-D virtual canopies for various genotypes and training systems. They highlight how such a statistical approach can provide more reliable outputs at the stand level than exhaustive architectural records of a limited number of plants.

Validation of GREENLAB model for field-grown maize at different densities


Figure 10
Parameter values describing variation of organ sink function in GREENLAB are shown by Ma et al. (pp. 1185–1194) to vary little between years and at different planting densities. This strengthens the hypothesis that one set of equations can govern dynamic organ growth in the GREENLAB model.

Modelling phenotypic plasticity using a structure–function model


Figure 11
The structure–function model GREENLAB allows resource-dependent plasticity of plant architecture to be simulated. Using tomato, a crop exhibiting marked morphogenetic responses to plant spacing, Dong et al. (pp. 1195–1206) examine strengths and weaknesses of the current version of GREENLAB in accounting for the plasticity of response to spacing.

Simulation of tree growth and development at different densities


Figure 12
A functional model of light competition is proposed by Cournède et al. (pp. 1207–1219) based on an empirical model of foliage spatial repartition and on the Beer–Lambert law of light extinction. The model shows that plant density strongly influences tree architectural development through interactions with source–sink balance during growth.

Modelling morphological plasticity in trees


Figure 13
Three-dimensional modelling is used by Vincent and Harja (pp. 1221–1231) to assess effects of morphological plasticity on tree performance. Simulations conducted in various competitive environments (contrasting planting density, stand composition, site fertility) all show significant competitive advantage of crown-shape plasticity in light-demanding species.

Modelling of alternating patterns


Figure 14
Mathieu et al. (pp. 1233–1242) formalize interactions between architecture and functioning using the GREENLAB mathematical model that permits theoretical studies of plant growth as well as simulations of alternating patterns, such as rhythms in fruiting or branch production. Emergent properties of the model are shown to simulate observed patterns faithfully.

Simulation of QTL detection for functional–structural model parameters


Figure 15
Letort et al. (pp. 1243–1254) introduce genetics into the GREENLAB functional–structural growth model. This gives access to fundamental traits for quantitative trait loci (QTL) detection. Computation of a genetic algorithm holds promise for detecting the allelic combination optimizing maize yield. The potential of GREENLAB to represent environment/genotype interactions is outlined.

Modelling cell–cell interactions during plant morphogenesis


Figure 16
During the development of multicellular organisms, cells interact with each other using a range of biological and physical mechanisms. Dupuy et al. (pp. 1255–1265) describe a new generic model of plant cellular morphogenesis that expresses interactions explicitly amongst cellular entities.

Numerical analysis of roots and tree overturning


Figure 17
A 2-D finite element analysis by Fourcaud et al. (pp. 1267–1280) couples the influence of root morphology and soil type on tree anchorage, and reveals the relative effects of lateral roots and the distal tap root on tree overturning. The contribution of secondary root growth to acclimation to mechanical stress is discussed.

Three-dimensional evaluation of roots in unstable sloping sites


Figure 18
Vegetation can stabilize landslide-prone sites. Danjon et al. (pp. 1281–1293) use 3-D digitized images to assess root-system architecture of woody plants growing on slopes and show that such data can be used to obtain accurate estimates of factors affecting safety.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in Ann Bot:

Plant Growth Modelling and Applications: The Increasing Importance of Plant Architecture in Growth Models
Thierry Fourcaud, Xiaopeng Zhang, Alexia Stokes, Hans Lambers, and Christian Körner
Ann Bot 2008 101: 1053-1063. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Models for Forest Ecosystem Management: A European Perspective
H. Pretzsch, R. Grote, B. Reineking, Th. Rötzer, and St. Seifert
Ann Bot 2008 101: 1065-1087. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

A Dynamical Model of Environmental Effects on Allocation to Carbon-based Secondary Compounds in Juvenile Trees
S. Gayler, T. E. E. Grams, W. Heller, D. Treutter, and E. Priesack
Ann Bot 2008 101: 1089-1098. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

The Derivation of Sink Functions of Wheat Organs using the GREENLAB Model
Mengzhen Kang, Jochem B. Evers, Jan Vos, and Philippe de Reffye
Ann Bot 2008 101: 1099-1108. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

A Rule-based Model of Barley Morphogenesis, with Special Respect to Shading and Gibberellic Acid Signal Transduction
Gerhard Buck-Sorlin, Reinhard Hemmerling, Ole Kniemeyer, Benno Burema, and Winfried Kurth
Ann Bot 2008 101: 1109-1123. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

AmapSim: A Structural Whole-plant Simulator Based on Botanical Knowledge and Designed to Host External Functional Models
Jean-François Barczi, Hervé Rey, Yves Caraglio, Philippe de Reffye, Daniel Barthélémy, Qiao Xue Dong, and Thierry Fourcaud
Ann Bot 2008 101: 1125-1138. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Using a 3-D Virtual Sunflower to Simulate Light Capture at Organ, Plant and Plot Levels: Contribution of Organ Interception, Impact of Heliotropism and Analysis of Genotypic Differences
Hervé Rey, Jean Dauzat, Karine Chenu, Jean-François Barczi, Guillermo A. A. Dosio, and Jérémie Lecoeur
Ann Bot 2008 101: 1139-1151. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Using Virtual Plants to Analyse the Light-foraging Efficiency of a Low-density Cotton Crop
Jean Dauzat, Pascal Clouvel, Delphine Luquet, and Pierre Martin
Ann Bot 2008 101: 1153-1166. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

A Three-dimensional Statistical Reconstruction Model of Grapevine (Vitis vinifera) Simulating Canopy Structure Variability within and between Cultivar/Training System Pairs
Gaëtan Louarn, Jérémie Lecoeur, and Eric Lebon
Ann Bot 2008 101: 1167-1184. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Parameter Optimization and Field Validation of the Functional–Structural Model GREENLAB for Maize at Different Population Densities
Yuntao Ma, Meiping Wen, Yan Guo, Baoguo Li, Paul-Henry Cournède, and Philippe de Reffye
Ann Bot 2008 101: 1185-1194. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Does the Structure–Function Model GREENLAB Deal with Crop Phenotypic Plasticity Induced by Plant Spacing? A Case Study on Tomato
Qiaoxue Dong, Gaëtan Louarn, Yiming Wang, Jean-Francois Barczi, and Philippe de Reffye
Ann Bot 2008 101: 1195-1206. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Computing Competition for Light in the GREENLAB Model of Plant Growth: A Contribution to the Study of the Effects of Density on Resource Acquisition and Architectural Development
Paul-Henry Cournède, Amélie Mathieu, François Houllier, Daniel Barthélémy, and Philippe de Reffye
Ann Bot 2008 101: 1207-1219. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Exploring Ecological Significance of Tree Crown Plasticity through Three-dimensional Modelling
G. Vincent and D. Harja
Ann Bot 2008 101: 1221-1231. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Rhythms and Alternating Patterns in Plants as Emergent Properties of a Model of Interaction between Development and Functioning
Amélie Mathieu, Paul-Henry Cournède, Daniel Barthélémy, and Philippe de Reffye
Ann Bot 2008 101: 1233-1242. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Quantitative Genetics and Functional–Structural Plant Growth Models: Simulation of Quantitative Trait Loci Detection for Model Parameters and Application to Potential Yield Optimization
Véronique Letort, Paul Mahe, Paul-Henry Cournède, Philippe de Reffye, and Brigitte Courtois
Ann Bot 2008 101: 1243-1254. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

A System for Modelling Cell–Cell Interactions during Plant Morphogenesis
Lionel Dupuy, Jonathan Mackenzie, Tim Rudge, and Jim Haseloff
Ann Bot 2008 101: 1255-1265. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Understanding the Impact of Root Morphology on Overturning Mechanisms: A Modelling Approach
Thierry Fourcaud, Jin-Nan Ji, Zhi-Qiang Zhang, and Alexia Stokes
Ann Bot 2008 101: 1267-1280. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Using Three-dimensional Plant Root Architecture in Models of Shallow-slope Stability
Frédéric Danjon, David H. Barker, Michael Drexhage, and Alexia Stokes
Ann Bot 2008 101: 1281-1293. [Abstract] [Full Text]  




This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Ann Bot
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?