Skip Navigation

Annals of Botany 2008 101(9):NP; doi:10.1093/aob/mcn078
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Ann Bot
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

ContentSnapshots

What explains the wide variation in root proliferation responses to nutrient patches? (Viewpoint)


Figure 1
From a meta-analysis of published data, Kembel et al. (pp. 1295–1301) conclude that foraging precision is part of a ‘fast’ suite of plant traits related to rapid growth and resource uptake. They find little to support the view that foraging scale and precision are correlated.

Mating in an annual colonizing plant


Figure 2
Plant density can influence mating, particularly in colonizing species that experience wide density variation. Friedman and Barrett (pp. 1303–1309) find that in Ambrosia artemisiifolia (common ragweed) showing uniformly high outcrossing rates, the species possesses a strong self-incompatibility mechanism. This finding is contrary to earlier reports and assumptions.

CLES, a virtual model to study crop–weed competition


Figure 3
Improving the competitive ability of crops is a sustainable method of weed management. Cici et al. (pp. 1311–1318) develop a virtual plant model of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) and sowthistle (Sonchus oleraceus) that may be used as a framework for discovering and/or developing more competitive chickpea cultivars.

Germination in Suaeda maritima


Figure 4
Effects of salinity, hydration, hypoxia and temperature on germination are compared with dry storage by Wetson et al. (pp. 1319–1327). They show that viability is maintained in both saline and anoxic conditions. However, cold saline or an equivalent osmotic medium inhibits germination during natural dormancy and predisposes seeds to germinate when the temperature rises and salinity falls.

Mode of action of herbicide quinclorac clarified


Figure 5
Alonso-Simón et al. (pp. 1329–1339) analyse bean culture cells habituated to normally lethal concentrations of quinclorac and compare them with cells habituated to cellulose biosynthesis inhibitors. Results indicate that quinclorac does not inhibit cellulose synthesis but provokes cell wall anomalies as a side-effect of an auxinic mode of action.

Food body ultrastructure in Japanese raisin tree


Figure 6
Buono et al. (pp. 1341–1348) describe the structure and chemical composition of nutritive reserves of food bodies (FBs) in young plants of Hovenia dulcis. FBs are shown to contain high-energy lipids and to be collected and eaten by ants. This suggests that FBs are important in plant–ant interactions.

Survey of physical dormancy in seeds of the Sapindaceae


Figure 7
The Sapindaceae is one of 16 angiosperm families whose seeds show physical dormancy. Cook et al. (pp. 1349–1362) investigate the occurrence of physical dormancy amongst 14 species in nine genera within the Australian Sapindaceae and find a strong correlation between physical dormancy and taxonomic relatedness.

Monocot leaves are tougher than dicot leaves


Figure 8
Dominy et al. (pp. 1363–1377) examine >100 species of tropical lowland rain forests of Australia, Singapore and Panama, and find monocot leaves physically tougher than dicot leaves when immature and when fully expanded. Toughness is thought to deter herbivory. In young expanding leaves, only those of monocot species are notably tough.

Monocot leaves are eaten less


Figure 9
Observations by Grubb et al. (pp. 1379–1389) support the notion that losses to herbivorous invertebrates by tropical lowland rain forest species are greatest during leaf expansion when toughness is minimal, and are less for monocots than dicots. This difference is greater during leaf expansion when only monocots exhibit significant toughness. Results are from six sites on four continents.

The costs of reproduction in congeneric dioecious Rhus javanica and R. trichocarpa


Figure 10
Relative reproductive allocation and costs in male and female plants are compared by Matsuyama and Sakimoto (pp. 1391–1400). Costs are detected in R. trichocarpa that leafs and flowers simultaneously but not in R. javanica where leafing follows flowering. These different phenological patterns may explain the different costs.

Floras of New Zealand and the southern Andes compared


Figure 11
Ezcurra et al. (pp. 1401–1412) compare 369 genera of ten vegetation types and conclude that similarities between NZ and SA increase from forest to non-forest vegetation and are highest in coastal vegetation and bogs. The flora of NZ is characterized by more genera of basal origin, especially in forests.

Reward and floral phenotype in Erysimum mediohispanicum


Figure 12
Floral rewards associated with certain morphological floral traits may underlie selection for these traits. Gómez et al. (pp. 1413–1420) show a significant association between nectar production rate and corolla tube length, and between pollen production and corolla diameter. Both traits are selected by main pollinators, suggesting that reward mediates in phenotypic selection.

Root biomass allocation and stem bending


Figure 13
Individual tree shelters suppress root biomass and radial growth. Coutand et al. (pp. 1421–1432) find that bending the stem within the shelter increases radial growth by ~30 % and re-allocates biomass towards roots. This demonstrates that lack of movement of the stem within the shelter deprives roots of biomass and inhibits radial expansion.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in Ann Bot:

Improving the Scale and Precision of Hypotheses to Explain Root Foraging Ability
Steven W. Kembel, Hans De Kroon, James F. Cahill, Jr., and Liesje Mommer
Ann Bot 2008 101: 1295-1301. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

High Outcrossing in the Annual Colonizing Species Ambrosia artemisiifolia (Asteraceae)
Jannice Friedman and Spencer C. H. Barrett
Ann Bot 2008 101: 1303-1309. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

A Canopy Architectural Model to Study the Competitive Ability of Chickpea with Sowthistle
S-Zahra-Hosseini Cici, Steve Adkins, and Jim Hanan
Ann Bot 2008 101: 1311-1318. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Do Conditions During Dormancy Influence Germination of Suaeda maritima?
Anne M. Wetson, Carla Cassaniti, and Timothy J. Flowers
Ann Bot 2008 101: 1319-1327. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Habituation of Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) Cell Cultures to Quinclorac and Analysis of the Subsequent Cell Wall Modifications
Ana Alonso-Simón, Penélope García-Angulo, Antonio Encina, José Luis Acebes, and Jesús Álvarez
Ann Bot 2008 101: 1329-1339. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Anatomy, Ultrastructure and Chemical Composition of Food Bodies of Hovenia dulcis (Rhamnaceae)
Rafael Andrade Buono, Alaíde Braga de Oliveira, and Elder Antonio Sousa Paiva
Ann Bot 2008 101: 1341-1348. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Occurrence of Physical Dormancy in Seeds of Australian Sapindaceae: A Survey of 14 Species in Nine Genera
A. Cook, S. R. Turner, J. M. Baskin, C. C. Baskin, K. J. Steadman, and K. W. Dixon
Ann Bot 2008 101: 1349-1362. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

In Tropical Lowland Rain Forests Monocots have Tougher Leaves than Dicots, and Include a New Kind of Tough Leaf
Nathaniel J. Dominy, Peter J. Grubb, Robyn V. Jackson, Peter W. Lucas, Daniel J. Metcalfe, Jens-Christian Svenning, and Ian M. Turner
Ann Bot 2008 101: 1363-1377. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Monocot Leaves are Eaten Less than Dicot Leaves in Tropical Lowland Rain Forests: Correlations with Toughness and Leaf Presentation
Peter J. Grubb, Robyn V. Jackson, Ignacio M. Barberis, Jennie N. Bee, David A. Coomes, Nathaniel J. Dominy, Marie Ann S. De La Fuente, Peter W. Lucas, Daniel J. Metcalfe, Jens-Christian Svenning, Ian M. Turner, and Orlando Vargas
Ann Bot 2008 101: 1379-1389. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Allocation to Reproduction and Relative Reproductive Costs in Two Species of Dioecious Anacardiaceae with Contrasting Phenology
Shuhei Matsuyama and Michinori Sakimoto
Ann Bot 2008 101: 1391-1400. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Floristic Relationships Among Vegetation Types of New Zealand and the Southern Andes: Similarities and Biogeographic Implications
Cecilia Ezcurra, Nora Baccalá, and Peter Wardle
Ann Bot 2008 101: 1401-1412. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Association Between Floral Traits and Rewards in Erysimum mediohispanicum (Brassicaceae)
José M. Gómez, Jordi Bosch, Francisco Perfectti, J. D. Fernández, Mohamed Abdelaziz, and J. P. M. Camacho
Ann Bot 2008 101: 1413-1420. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Mechanical Stimuli Regulate the Allocation of Biomass in Trees: Demonstration with Young Prunus avium Trees
Catherine Coutand, Christian Dupraz, Gaëlle Jaouen, Stéphane Ploquin, and Boris Adam
Ann Bot 2008 101: 1421-1432. [Abstract] [Full Text]  




This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Ann Bot
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?