Skip Navigation


AOBPreview originally published online on July 30, 2004
Annals of Botany 2004 94(3):405-411; doi:10.1093/aob/mch157
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/3/405    most recent
mch157v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LIU, F.
Right arrow Articles by ANDERSEN, M. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by LIU, F.
Right arrow Articles by ANDERSEN, M. N.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by LIU, F.
Right arrow Articles by ANDERSEN, M. N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Annals of Botany 94/3, © Annals of Botany Company 2004; all rights reserved

Pod Set Related to Photosynthetic Rate and Endogenous ABA in Soybeans Subjected to Different Water Regimes and Exogenous ABA and BA at Early Reproductive Stages

FULAI LIU1,*, CHRISTIAN R. JENSEN1 and MATHIAS N. ANDERSEN2

1 The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Department of Agricultural Sciences, Højbakkegaard Allé 9, DK-2630 Taastrup, Denmark and 2 Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Crop Physiology and Soil Science, Research Centre Foulum, PO Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark

* For correspondence. E-mail: fl{at}kvl.dk

Received: 16 April 2004    Returned for revision: 10 May 2004    Accepted: 21 May 2004    Published electronically: 30 July 2004


   ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 LITERATURE CITED
 

Background and Aims The physiological reasons for reduced pod set in soybean (Glycine max) caused by drought during anthesis are not established. The objective of this study was to investigate the involvement of photosynthetic rate (A), pod endogenous abscisic acid (ABA) and exogenously applied ABA and 6-benzylaminopurine (BA) in regulating pod set in soybean during drought.

Methods Two pot experiments were done in a controlled-environment glasshouse. In expt I, soybeans were either well-watered (WW) or droughted by withholding water from 4 d before to 4 d after anthesis (DAA). In expt II, soybeans were drought-stressed (DS) from –4 to 4 DAA. From –2 to 4 DAA, some of the WW and DS plants were treated with 0·1 mM ABA or 1 mM BA.

Key Results Drought stress decreased A, but increased pod ABA concentration ([ABA]). Pod set decreased only when A had decreased by 40 %, and pod [ABA] had increased 1·5-fold. Beyond the thresholds, pod set correlated positively with A and negatively with pod [ABA]. Exogenously applied ABA decreased A and pod set in WW plants, whilst it increased A and pod set in DS plants; exogenous BA had opposite effects. In these plants, pod set correlated linearly with A.

Conclusions Drought-induced decrease in A is significant in inducing pod abortion, probably as a consequence of carbohydrate deprivation. The effects of ABA and BA on pod set may be partially due to their effects on photosynthate supply.

Key words: Glycine max, abscisic acid, 6-benzylaminopurine, drought stress, photosynthatic rate, pod set


   INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 LITERATURE CITED
 
In soybean, reproductive potential may be reduced considerably due to abscission of developing flowers and pods soon after anthesis during pro-embryo development [3–5 d after anthesis (DAA)] (Peterson et al., 1990Go) even under optimal environmental conditions (Carlson et al., 1987Go). This stage is one of active cell division in the young ovules, coinciding with a rapid pod expansion (Peterson et al., 1992Go), which is particularly sensitive to drought stress (Westgate and Peterson, 1993Go). Although there is no consensus about the physiological mechanisms controlling pod abortion during this critical stage under drought stress, factors that slow cell division and expansion within the ovaries, such as the availability of assimilate and changes in the endogenous concentrations of certain phytohormones, particularly ABA and cytokinins (CKs) are probably involved. Experimental evidence from cereals (e.g. maize) and grain legumes (e.g. lupin) has indicated important roles of these factors in regulating kernel/pod set under drought conditions (Hoad, 1978Go; Westgate et al., 1996Go; Palta and Ludwig, 1997Go; Saini and Westgate, 2000Go; Setter et al., 2001Go).

Photosynthate supply plays an important role in controlling crop reproductive development under well-watered conditions. Manipulation studies involving altered radiation intensities (Egli and Yu, 1991Go), elevated atmospheric CO2 (Mitchell et al., 1996Go; Palta and Ludwig, 2000Go), and supplying sucrose via stem injection (Abdin et al., 1998Go) have demonstrated that there is a linear relationship between the rate of assimilate supply and the number of fruit/seed per unit area of land surface for several crop species, including soybeans. It is also well known that the export rate of sucrose from source (leaves) to sink (fruits/seeds) organs correlates linearly with the current photosynthetic rate (A) (Huber et al., 1984Go). Soil water deficits reduce A and thus the amount of photosynthate allocated to floral organs and may, thereby, increase the rate of fruit/seed abortion. In drought-stressed maize (Zea mays), a fundamental role of current photosynthate supply in determining kernel set has been proposed (Schussler and Westgate, 1995Go; Setter et al., 2001Go). However, this aspect has not been investigated in soybeans.

Phytohormones may also regulate plant reproductive development in response to drought stress. The ABA concentration ([ABA]) increased significantly in the xylem sap, leaves and reproductive structures of drought-stressed plants (Hoad, 1978Go; Westgate et al., 1996Go; Setter et al., 2001Go; Liu et al., 2003Go). Soil drying reduced seed set in wheat (Triticum aestivum) (Westgate et al., 1996Go) and maize (Setter et al., 2001Go), and pod set in soybean (Liu et al., 2003Go) has been ascribed to the elevated [ABA] in reproductive structures. In addition, manipulation studies have shown that exogenous application of ABA to leaves or to ears reduced seed set in maize (Myers et al., 1990Go) and wheat (Wang et al., 2001Go) supporting a role of greater [ABA] in reducing seed set in drought-stressed crops. A negative linear relationship between seed set and [ABA] in floral organs has been observed in drought-stressed wheat (Westgate et al., 1996Go). However, the extent to which changes in endogenous pod [ABA] affect pod set is unknown, or if exogenous ABA induces pod abortion in soybeans.

Apart from ABA, CKs play an important role in regulating crop reproductive development (Hare et al., 1997Go). Application of cytokinin-like substances, e.g. 6-benzylaminopurine (BA), to individual racemes or to the transpiration stream can prevent pod abortion in well-watered soybean (Carlson et al., 1987Go; Nagel et al., 2001Go) and lupin (Lupinus angustifolius) (Atkins and Pigeaire, 1993Go; Ma et al., 1998Go). It is suggested that CKs reduce soybean and lupin pod abortion by increasing sink strength and redirecting the movement of assimilates into treated tissues (Reese et al., 1995Go; Ma et al., 1998Go). Therefore, it is plausible to suggest that exogenous application of CKs to drought-stressed plants might prevent pod abortion. However, this has not been studied.

In the current study, A and pod [ABA] were quantified in soybeans subjected to different durations, and thus intensities, of drought stress during early reproductive development. The effects of exogenously applied ABA and BA on pod set in both WW and DS soybeans were also investigated. The objective was to establish how drought-induced changes in A and endogenous [ABA], and exogenous applied ABA and BA relate to pod set.


   MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Plant material and growing conditions
Two pot experiments (expts I and II) were done at the experimental station of the Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University (KVL), Taastrup, Denmark. Soybeans (Glycine max L. Merr. ‘Holladay’, supplied by Dr Tommy Carter, North Carolina State University, USDA, ARS, USA) were sown in pots (15-cm diameter and 25-cm tall) containing 0·5 kg compost (GB-Pindstrup Substrates No.1, pH 6·0). Seeds were inoculated with Bradyrhizobium japonicum (MicroBio Ltd, Cambridge, UK) before sowing. Three seeds were sown and plants thinned to one per pot when the first trifoliate leaf emerged. Plants were grown in a glasshouse where day/night air temperature was 28/22 ± 2 °C; relative humidity was 60 %; photoperiod was 13 h with 600 µmol m–2 s–1 (PAR) supplied by metal-halide lamps. Pots were randomized in the glasshouse daily.

Water supply treatment
At the beginning of the experiments, pots were watered and allowed to drain freely to constant mass (about 3·4 kg); this was 100 % water holding capacity (WHC). Two weeks after emergence, all plants were well watered (WW) daily to 95 % WHC with nutrient solution (Pioneer NPK Macro 14-3-23 + Mg combined with Pioneer Micro; pH 5·5; EC 1·3) using automatic drip irrigation. Plants were irrigated with tap water without nutrients from –4 DAA. In expt I, irrigation was withheld from eight pots each day from –4 (DS6), –3 (DS5), –2 (DS4), –1 (DS3), 0 (DS2), and 1 (DS1) to 4 DAA. Thereafter half were re–watered to 95 % WHC with nutrient solution until physiological maturity. For the control treatment, eight plants were WW at 95 % WHC throughout the experimental period, but without nutrients from –4 to 4 DAA. In expt II, soybeans were drought stressed (DS) from –4 to 4 DAA, with WW plants as controls. On 4 DAA, half of the plants were harvested and the rest were WW until maturity.

Exogenous application of ABA and BA
In expt II, from –2 to 4 DAA, 0·1 mM (±)-cis, trans-abscisic acid (ABA; Sigma-Aldrich Chemie Gmbh, Steinheim, Germany) and 1 mM 6-benzylaminopurine (BA, a synthetic CK; Sigma-Aldrich Chemie Gmbh) were each applied, using a hand-held aerosol propelled sprayer, separately, every day, to the canopy (including leaves and racemes) of eight WW and eight DS plants each until incipient runoff (approx. 10 mL aqueous solution per plant). The control plants (eight WW and eight DS) were sprayed with the same amount of distilled water. ABA and BA were dissolved first, in very small volumes of ethanol, and then with de-ionized water containing 0·01 % Tween 20 as wetting agent (Cho et al., 2002Go).

Pod sampling
In both experiments, flowers on racemes from main stem nodes (7–11) in the middle of the canopy were tagged before anthesis and their development and growth were monitored. All flowers opened within a period of 2 d. The date of flowering (anthesis) was determined when the banner petal had fully extended in length (B2 stage according to Peterson et al., 1992Go). In expt I, pods were sampled 4 DAA, immediately weighed, then frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at –80 °C before analysis. In both experiments, the number of flowers was counted at 0–1 DAA and pods that developed from them counted every 3 d until the rate of pod-set became constant. Pods more than 2 cm long were considered to be fertile. The percentage of pod set was calculated as the number of fertile pods divided by the number of flowers.

Measurements of stomatal conductance (gs), A, and leaf water potential (LWP)
In expt I at sampling (4 DAA) and in expt II from 0 to 4 DAA, gs and A were measured on the second, fully expanded leaf in the upper canopy (one leaf per plant, four plants per treatment). Measurements were made between 1100 and 1300 h at photosynthetic light saturation (PAR > 800 µmol m–2 s–1, sunlight supplemented with metal-halide lamps), air humidity around 50–60 % and air CO2 concentration around 400 µL L–1 with a LI-6200 portable photosynthesis system (LiCor Inc. Lincoln, NE, USA). Midday LWP was measured, with a pressure chamber (Soil Moisture Equipment Corp., Santa Barbara, CA, USA), on the leaf for gs and A measurements.

ABA assay
This was only done in expt I. Pod samples were finely ground under liquid nitrogen, extracted in glass-distilled water using about 1·5 mL per 50 mg f. wt, and extracted on a shaker at 4 °C overnight. The extracts were centrifuged and supernatants assayed for ABA using an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with monoclonal antibody (AFRC MAC 252) according to Asch et al. (2001)Go. No cross-reaction of the antibody with other compounds in crude extracts was detected when tested according to Quarrie et al. (1988)Go.

Data analysis and statistics
Data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA); appropriate standard errors of the means were calculated. Turkey's Studentized Range (HSD) Test (P ≤ 0·05) was applied to compare the pod set percentages from different water treatments (SAS Institute, 1988Go). In expt I, the relationships of pod set to A and to pod [ABA] were evaluated using PROC NLIN of PC SAS (SAS Institute, 1988Go) with a linear–plateau model, threshold values for A and pod [ABA] at which pod set decreased were obtained (Liu et al., 2004Go).


   RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 LITERATURE CITED
 
LWP
In expt I, at sampling (4 DAA), midday LWP was –0·58 MPa and similar in DS1–DS3 and WW plants. LWP decreased to –1·68 MPa in the most severely droughted (DS6) plants (Fig. 1). In expt II, midday LWP of WW plants was –0·52 MPa, it decreased significantly in DS plants to –1·88 MPa (Fig. 1). ABA application did not affect LWP in WW plants, but significantly increased it to –1·45 MPa in DS plants. BA application had no significant effect on LWP in WW plants, but decreased it to approx. –2·29 MPa in DS plants (Fig. 1).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Leaf water potential (LWP) of well-watered (WW) and drought-stressed (DS1-DS6) soybeans in expt I and of the WW and DS plants with (+) or without (–) ABA or BA application at harvests (4 DAA) in expt II. Bars indicate s.e.m. (n = 4).

 
gs, A, and pod [ABA]
In expt I, gs and A of WW plants were 0·54 mol m–2 s–1 and 24·2 µmol m–2 s–1 and were decreased by drought (DS6 plants) to 0·12 mol m–2 s–1 and 2·9 µmol m–2 s–1, respectively (Fig. 2). In expt II, gs of WW plants was above 0·4 mol m–2 s–1 from 0 to 4 DAA. BA-treated WW plants had slightly higher gs than those without BA, while ABA treatment significantly decreased gs in WW plants. DS decreased gs significantly in those plants, and exogenous BA slightly decreased, whilst exogenous ABA slightly increased, gs compared with plants without hormone treatment. Similar trends were observed for A (Fig. 2).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Stomatal conductance (gs) and photosynthetic rate (A) of well-watered (WW) and drought-stressed (DS1–DS6) soybeans at harvest (4 DAA) in expt I and of the WW and DS plants with or without ABA and BA application from 0 to 4 DAA in expt II. Bars indicate s.e.m. (n = 4).

 
Pod endogenous [ABA] was only determined in expt I. Pod [ABA] was lower in WW plants than DS plants, where it increased significantly approx. eight-fold in DS6 plants compared with the WW controls (Fig. 3).



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Pod [ABA] of well-watered (WW) and drought-stressed (DS1–DS6) soybeans in expt I at harvest (4 DAA). Bars indicate s.e.m. (n = 4).

 
Pod set
In expt I, pod set of the tagged flowers in WW plants was 66 %, similar to DS1–DS3 plants, it decreased in DS4 and was 41 % in DS6 plants (Fig. 4). In expt II, pod set of WW plants was 62 %, and was decreased significantly to approx. 44 % in DS plants (Fig. 4). Exogenous ABA decreased pod set in WW plants to approx. 55 %, while it increased it to approx. 49 % in DS plants. BA application significantly increased pod set in WW plants to approx. 69 % but in DS plants, BA slightly decreased pod set although not significantly (Fig. 4).



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Pod set percentages of well-watered (WW) and drought-stressed (DS1–DS6) soybeans in expt I and of the WW and DS plants with (+) or without (–) ABA or BA application at physiological maturity in expt II. Mean values that are significantly different at P ≤ 0·05 have no letters in common. Bars indicate s.e.m. (n = 4).

 
Relationships of pod set to A and pod [ABA]
To assess the possible associations between pod set and A and pod endogenous [ABA], regression analyses were performed. In expt I, the relationships of pod set to A and pod [ABA] were well described by linear–plateau functions (Fig. 5). Pod set decreased when A (Fig. 5A) had decreased by approx. 40 % and pod [ABA] (Fig. 5B) had increased 1·5-fold compared with the WW plants; beyond the thresholds, pod set correlated positively with A and negatively with pod [ABA] (Fig. 5). In expt II, a close linear relationship between pod set and A was obtained across the treatments (Fig. 5A).



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Relationships of pod set to A (A) and to pod [ABA] (B) of soybeans subjected to different drought stresses and ABA or BA treatments. The big open circles indicate WW plants in expt I. The linear function in (A) is obtained based on data from expt II (symbols are the same as in Fig. 2). Bars represent s.e.m. (n = 4). **, *** Significance levels at P < 0·01 and P < 0·001, respectively.

 


   DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Role of photosynthate supply in regulation of pod set
Charles-Edwards et al. (1986)Go suggested that the number of seeds per plant of soybean is linearly correlated with A. This hypothesis was supported by the work of Egli (1988)Go, Egli and Yu (1991)Go and Jiang and Egli (1993)Go using source–sink manipulations. However, none of these studies considered the effects of drought stress on photosynthesis and its relationship to pod set of the plants. In the present study, pod set decreased in DS3–DS4 when A had decreased by 40 %; beyond this point pod set correlated positively with A (Fig. 5A). This indicates that pod set is insensitive to a decrease in A until a threshold. As in maize (Quattar et al., 1987Go) the assimilate reserves from vegetative organs of soybean might have been re-mobilized and used for reproductive growth under mild drought conditions. However, when A was lower than the threshold, it becomes a controlling factor for pod set, in line with earlier findings in maize (Schussler and Westgate, 1995Go; Setter et al., 2001Go). However, the relationship of pod set to A is based on only one day of measurement; accumulative A during the drying period might be more important.

For plants treated with ABA and BA, a linear relationship between pod set and A was obtained (Fig. 5A), indicating that the effects of the two hormones on pod set in soybean might simply be due to their effects on A.

Role of ABA in regulation of pod set
In cereals, several lines of evidence have suggested that drought-induced large concentrations of ABA in the reproductive structures exert a negative effect on fruit/seed set (Ober et al., 1991Go; Westgate et al., 1996Go; Setter et al., 2001Go). In soybean, recent studies showed that [ABA] in flowers and pods was increased by DS, and was associated with a reduction in pod set. Based on these findings, it was speculated that drought-induced an increase in [ABA] causing pod abortion (Liu et al., 2003Go). However, direct cause and effect could not be shown, and direct evidence to support this hypothesis is still lacking. In the present study, endogenous [ABA] in pods from plants at different stresses have been related to pod set. ABA was applied simultaneously to the plants grown under both WW and DS conditions to test if it could mimic the effect of drought stress on pod set. As expected, pod set correlated negatively with pod [ABA] when the latter was above a threshold value (Fig. 5B); this is in line with early findings in wheat (Westgate et al., 1996Go). Also, exogenous ABA reduced pod set in WW plants (Fig. 4), in accordance with data for maize (Mambelli and Setter, 1998Go) and wheat (Wang et al., 2001Go), suggesting a role of ABA in controlling pod set in soybeans. However, it was also observed that ABA application had a positive effect on pod set in the DS plants. The reason for these contrasting effects of exogenous ABA on pod set in WW vs. DS soybeans is not known. However, it raises the question as to whether ABA affected pod set directly via the processes within the ovary (i.e. cell division) or indirectly via influencing the availability of photosynthate. A similar argument had been raised previously for seed abortion in wheat (Waters et al., 1984Go). The results of the present study showed clearly that the effect of exogenous ABA on pod set was due partially to its effect on photosynthesis (Fig. 5A). It was clear that exogenous ABA induced closure of stomata in the DS plants at early stages of soil drying, so slowing development of water deficits and resulting in a high LWP, with the result that DS plants could maintain a greater A than those without ABA treatment. Studies have shown that a large LWP is vital for seed set in wheat (Dembinska et al., 1992Go) and pod set in soybean (Liu et al., 2004Go).

However, as exogenous ABA decreased pod set in WW plants to an extent greater than expected based on its effect on A as observed in expt I (Fig. 5A), it is suggested that ABA has a direct effect on metabolic processes within the ovary, although the underlying biochemical mechanisms need to be elucidated further.

Role of exogenous BA in regulation of pod set
Under WW conditions, studies in soybean and lupin have shown that the endogenous [CKs] in the pods are positively correlated with the probability of pod set (Emery et al., 2000Go; Kokubun and Honda, 2000Go). In the present study, it was observed that exogenous BA increased pod set in WW soybeans, in line with earlier findings (Peterson et al., 1990Go; Nagel et al., 2001Go). Based on these, it is suggested that CKs play a role in controlling pod set in soybeans. Studies in soybean (Reese et al., 1995Go), lupin (Ma et al., 1998Go), rice (Yang et al., 2002Go), wheat (Lejeune et al., 1998Go) and maize (Guo et al., 1995Go) have indicated that exogenous CKs increase pod/grain set as the hormones increase the availability of current photosynthate and sink strength, and redirect movement of photosynthate into treated tissues. In the present study, it was obvious that exogenous BA increased A in WW plants, which leads to a greater availability of photosynthate for pod growth, and may thereby increase pod set (Fig. 5A). However, according to the results obtained in expt I, one would expect that increase of photosynthate supply above a critical value would not increase pod set. Thus, a direct effect of the hormone on the processes within the ovary (e.g. cell division) may exist.

It was surprising that BA application failed to prevent pod abortion in the DS plants, as expected, by inhibiting the effect of ABA. This was in contrast to our expectation, and earlier findings in DS lupin (Palta and Ludwig, 1997Go). Radin et al. (1982)Go demonstrated that application of BA can decrease the sensitivity of stomata to ABA during soil drying. As a consequence of these, exogenous application of BA to the DS plants may lead to a greater loss of water from leaf tissue during mild soil water deficits, resulting in early wilting (Nagel et al., 2001Go). This may override the positive effect of BA on reproductive development and prevent an increase in pod set under low LWP. Consistent with this, it was observed that exogenous BA decreased LWP and A in DS plants which might have contributed to decreased pod set. However, it was noteworthy that when BA was sprayed on the whole canopy, most of the BA applied was likely to attach to the leaves, and affect the leaf processes, much more than to the pods. This may help to explain why foliar spray of BA did not prevent pod abortion in the DS plants. Therefore, future studies should be based on organ- or tissue-specific application of BA in soybeans to illustrate the underlying mechanisms of CKs in controlling pod set.

It is concluded that drought-induced decrease of current photosynthate supply is significant in inducing pod abortion in soybeans during early reproductive development. ABA and BA affect pod set partially due to their effects on A.


   ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 LITERATURE CITED
 
We thank Dr Tommy Carter, North Carolina State University, USDA, ARS, for the soybean seeds and Dr Steven Quarrie, John Innes Centre, UK, for the antibody to ABA. Technical assistance of Britta Skov and Jørgen Hansen Thage is gratefully acknowledged.


   LITERATURE CITED
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 LITERATURE CITED
 

    Abdin OM, Zhou X, Coulman BE, Cloutier D, Faris MA, Smith DL. 1998. Effect of sucrose supplementation by stem injection on the development of soybean plants. Journal of Experimental Botany 49: 2013–2018.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Asch F, Andersen MN, Jensen CR, Mogensen VO. 2001. Ovary abscisic acid concentration does not induce kernel abortion in field-grown maize subjected to drought. European Journal of Agronomy 15: 119–129.[CrossRef]

    Atkins CA, Pigeaire A. 1993. Application of cytokinins to flowers to increase pod set in Lupinus angustifolius L. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 44: 1799–1819.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

    Carlson DR, Dyer DJ, Cotterman CD, Durley R. 1987. The physiological basis for cytokinin induced increases in pod set in IX93-100 soybeans. Plant Physiology 84: 233–239.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Charles-Edwards DA, Doley D, Rimmington GM. 1986. Modelling plant growth and development. North Ryde, NSW, Australia: Academic Press.

    Cho Y, Suh SK, Park HK, Wood A. 2002. Impact of 2,4-DP and BAP upon pod set and seed yield in soybean treated at reproductive stages. Plant Growth Regulation 36: 215–221.

    Dembinska O, Lalonde S, Saini HS. 1992. Evidence against the regulation of grain set by spikelet abscisic acid levels in water-stressed wheat. Plant Physiology 100: 1599–1602.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Egli DB. 1988. Alterations in plant growth and dry matter distribution in soybean. Agronomy Journal 80: 86–90.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Egli DB, Yu ZW. 1991. Crop growth rate and seeds per unit area in soybean. Crop Science 31: 439–442.

    Emery RJN, Ma Q, Atkins CA. 2000. The forms and sources of cytokinins in developing white lupine seed and fruits. Plant Physiology 123: 1593–1604.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Guo WS, Feng CN, Van LL. 1995. Analysis on source-sink relationship after anthesis in wheat. Acta Agronomy Sinica 21: 335–340.

    Hare PD, Cress WA, van Staden J. 1997. The involvement of cytokinins in plant response to environmental stress. Plant Growth Regulation 23: 79–103.

    Hoad GV. 1978. Effect of water stress on abscisic acid levels in white lupin (Lupinus albus L.) fruit, leaves and phloem exudates. Planta 142: 287–290.[CrossRef]

    Huber SC, Rogers, HH, Mowry FL. 1984. Effects of water stress on photosynthesis and carbon partitioning in soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.) plants grown in the field at different CO2 levels. Plant Physiology 76: 244–249.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Jiang H, Egli DB. 1993. Shade induced changes in flower and pod number and flower and fruit abscission in soybean. Agronomy Journal 85: 221–225.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Kokubun M, Honda I. 2000. Intra-raceme variation in pod set probability is associated with cytokinin content in soybeans. Plant Production Science 3: 354–359.

    Lejeune P, Prinsen E, van Onckelen H, Bernier G. 1998. Hormonal control of ear abortion in a stress-sensitive maize inbred. Australian Journal Plant Physiology 25: 481–488.

    Liu F, Andersen MN, Jensen CR. 2003. Loss of pod set caused by drought stress is associated with water status and ABA content of reproductive structures in soybean. Functional Plant Biology 30: 271–280.[CrossRef]

    Liu F, Andersen MN, Jensen CR. 2004. Root signal controls pod growth in drought-stressed soybean during the critical, abortion-sensitive phase of pod development. Field Crops Research 85: 159–166.[CrossRef]

    Ma Q, Longnecker N, Atkins C. 1998. Exogenous cytokinin and nitrogen do not increase grain yield in narrow-leafed lupins. Crop Science 38: 717–721.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Mambelli S, Setter TL. 1998. Inhibition of maize endosperm cell division and endorepdulication by exogenously applied abscisic acid. Physiologia Plantarum 104: 266–272.[CrossRef]

    Mitchell RAC, Gibbard CL, Mitchell VJ, Lawlor DW. 1996. Effects of shading in different developmental phases on biomass and grain yield of winter wheat at ambient and elevated CO2. Plant Cell and Environment 19: 615–621.[CrossRef]

    Myers PN, Setter TL, Madison JT, Thompson JE. 1990. Abscisic-acid inhibition of endosperm cell-division in cultured maize kernels. Plant Physiology 94: 1330–1336.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Nagel L, Brewster R, Riedell WE, Reese RN. 2001. Cytokinin regulation of flower and pod set in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). Annals of Botany 88: 27–31.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Ober ES, Setter TL, Madison JT, Thompson JF, Shapiro PS. 1991. Influence of water deficit on maize endosperm development. Enzyme activities and RNA transcripts of starch and zein synthesis, abscisic acid, and cell division. Plant Physiology 97: 154–164.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Palta JA, Ludwig C. 1997. Pod set and seed yield as affected by cytokinin application and terminal drought in narrow-leafed lupin. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 48: 81–90.

    Palta JA, Ludwig C. 2000. Elevated CO2 during pod filling increase seed yield by not harvest index in indeterminate narrow-leafed lupin. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 51: 279–286.[CrossRef]

    Peterson CM, Mosjidis COH, Dute RR, Westgate ME. 1992. A flower and pod staging system for soybean. Annals of Botany 69: 59–67.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Peterson CM, Williams JC, Kuang A. 1990. Increased pod set of determinate cultivars of soybean, Glycine max, by 6-benzylaminapurine. Botanical Gazette 151: 322–330.[CrossRef]

    Quarrie SA, Whitford PN, Appleford NE, Wang TL, Cook SK, Henson IE, Lovey BR. 1988. A monoclonal antibody to (S)-abscisic acid: its characterisation and use in a radio-immunoassay for measuring abscisic acid in crude extracts of cereal and lupin leaves. Planta 173: 330–339.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

    Quattar S, Jones RJ, Crookston RK. 1987. Effect of water deficit during grain filling on the pattern of maize kernel growth and development. Crop Science 27: 726–730.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Radin JW, Parker LL, Guinn G. 1982. Water relations of cotton plants under nitrogen deficiency. V. Environmental control of abscisic acid accumulation and stomatal sensitivity to abscisic acid. Plant Physiology 70: 1066–1070.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Reese RN, Dybing CD, White CA, Page SM, Larson JE. 1995. Expression of vegetative storage protein (VSP-Beta) in soybean raceme tissues in response to flower set. Journal of Experimental Botany 46: 957–964.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    SAS Institute. 1988. SAS/STAT user's guide: release 6·03'. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute.

    Saini HS, Westgate ME. 2000. Reproductive development in grain crops during drought. Advances in Agronomy 68: 59–95.[Web of Science]

    Schussler JR, Westgate ME. 1995. Assimilate flux determines kernel set at low water potential in maize. Crop Science 35: 1074–1080.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Setter TL, Flannigan BA, Melkonian J. 2001. Loss of kernel set due to water deficit and shade in maize: carbohydrate supplies, abscisic acid, and cytokinins. Crop Science 41: 1530–1540.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Wang Z, Cao W, Dai T, Zhou Q. 2001. Effect of exogenous hormones on floret development and grain set in wheat. Plant Growth Regulation 35: 225–231.[CrossRef]

    Waters SP, Martin P, Lee BT. 1984. The influence of sucrose and abscisic acid on the determination of grain number in wheat. Journal of Experimental Botany 35: 829–840.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Westgate ME, Peterson CM. 1993. Flower and pod development in water-deficient soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.). Journal of Experimental Botany 44: 109–117.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Westgate ME, Passioura JB, Munns R. 1996. Water status and ABA content of floral organs in drought-stressed wheat. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 23: 763–772.[Web of Science]

    Yang JC, Zhang JH, Wang ZQ, Zhu QS, Liu JJ. 2002. Abscisic acid and cytokinins in the root exudates and leaves and their relationship to senescence and remobilization of carbon reserves in rice subjected to water stress during grain filling. Planta 215: 645–652.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/3/405    most recent
mch157v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LIU, F.
Right arrow Articles by ANDERSEN, M. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by LIU, F.
Right arrow Articles by ANDERSEN, M. N.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by LIU, F.
Right arrow Articles by ANDERSEN, M. N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?