AOBPreview originally published online on May 13, 2005
Annals of Botany 2005 96(1):9-21; doi:10.1093/aob/mci155
Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company 2005
Cellulose Biosynthesis: Current Views and Evolving Concepts
INDER M. SAXENA and
R. MALCOLM BROWN, JR*
Section of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA
* For correspondence. E-mail rmbrown{at}mail.utexas.edu
Received: 18 January 2005
Returned for revision: 15 March 2005
Accepted: 25 March 2005
Published electronically: 13 May 2005
 |
ABSTRACT
|
|---|
Aims To outline the current state of knowledge and discuss the evolution of various viewpoints put forth to explain the mechanism of cellulose biosynthesis.
Scope Understanding the mechanism of cellulose biosynthesis is one of the major challenges in plant biology. The simplicity in the chemical structure of cellulose belies the complexities that are associated with the synthesis and assembly of this polysaccharide. Assembly of cellulose microfibrils in most organisms is visualized as a multi-step process involving a number of proteins with the key protein being the cellulose synthase catalytic sub-unit. Although genes encoding this protein have been identified in almost all cellulose synthesizing organisms, it has been a challenge in general, and more specifically in vascular plants, to demonstrate cellulose synthase activity in vitro. The assembly of glucan chains into cellulose microfibrils of specific dimensions, viewed as a spontaneous process, necessitates the assembly of synthesizing sites unique to most groups of organisms. The steps of polymerization (requiring the specific arrangement and activity of the cellulose synthase catalytic sub-units) and crystallization (directed self-assembly of glucan chains) are certainly interlinked in the formation of cellulose microfibrils. Mutants affected in cellulose biosynthesis have been identified in vascular plants. Studies on these mutants and herbicide-treated plants suggest an interesting link between the steps of polymerization and crystallization during cellulose biosynthesis.
Conclusions With the identification of a large number of genes encoding cellulose synthases and cellulose synthase-like proteins in vascular plants and the supposed role of a number of other proteins in cellulose biosynthesis, a complete understanding of this process will necessitate a wider variety of research tools and approaches than was thought to be required a few years back.
Key words:
Cellulose, plant cell wall, cotton, Arabidopsis thaliana, Acetobacter xylinum, cellulose synthase, cellulose synthase-like, glycosyltransferases, terminal complex, polymerization, crystallization
 |
INTRODUCTION
|
|---|
Cellulose is often referred to as the most abundant macromolecule
on earth (Brown, 2004

) and most of the cellulose is produced
by vascular plants. Apart from these plants, cellulose synthesis
also occurs in most groups of algae, the slime mold
Dictyostelium,
a number of bacterial species (including the cyanobacteria),
and tunicates in the animal kingdom. Cellulose is an extracellular
polysaccharide and, with the exception of bacteria and the tunicates,
it is part of the cell wall in plants, algae and
Dictyostelium.
The function of cellulose in these different groups of organisms
reflects the diverse roles associated with this simple structural
polysaccharide. Whereas it is possible for some of these organisms,
specifically bacteria, to survive in the absence of cellulose
synthesis, it may not be true for most vascular plant cells
to survive in the absence of cellulose synthesis. As such, the
importance of cellulose in the life of a plant cannot be overemphasized
since it not only provides the necessary strength to resist
the turgor pressure in plant cells but also has a distinct role
in maintaining the size, shape and division/differentiation
potential of most plant cells and ultimately the direction of
plant growth (
Fig. 1). In the authors' view, deposition of cellulose
microfibrils in a specific orientation for determining the direction
of plant cell elongation, in a sense, is a stage of commitment
akin to the S phase and M phase in eukaryotic cell cycle. Once
the cellulose microfibrils are ordered in a specific orientation,
the direction of cell elongation is essentially fixed. There
are a very large number of questions related to cellulose biosynthesis
that need to be addressed; however, at this point it is important
to recognize that after a long hiatus there is an exponential
increase in the number of research articles that discuss the
molecular aspects of cellulose biosynthesis, and many of these
advances have been made with the identification of genes, specifically
for cellulose synthases, and cellulose-deficient mutants in
plants. A comprehensive view of cellulose synthesis and the
plant cell wall is provided in reviews by Delmer (1999)

, Doblin
et al. (2002)

, and Somerville
et al. (2004)

. Excellent articles
on individual topics related to cellulose biosynthesis are provided
in a special recent issue of the journal
Cellulose (Vol. 11,
no. 3/4, September/December 2004). In this review, selective
topics in cellulose biosynthesis will be discussed with the
goal of providing a timely and unique view of this rather exciting
field of study from the authors' perspective.

View larger version (183K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1. (A) Ultrathin section of recently divided cells just below the meristem of a Zea mays root tip. Note the recently synthesized transverse walls (thinner). The elongation axis will be perpendicular to this direction. (Unpublished micrograph, courtesy of Susette Mueller and R. Malcolm Brown, Jr.) (B) Freeze fracture showing the E fracture face (EF) of a large area of an elongating cell in the root of Zea mays. The direction of microfibril impressions and, hence, the direction of the orientation of the microfibrils themselves, is perpendicular to the axis of elongation. Note also a prominent pit field (pf) in the centre of the micrograph. Microfibril synthesis around this pit field gives clues that suggest a membrane flow mechanism in the plane of the fluid membrane may underlie and direct cellulose microfibril synthesis (see Mueller and Brown, 1982a , b ). Evidence to support this hypothesis is based on the direction of microfibrillar tears through the plasma membrane where the terminal globules and direction of synthesis is revealed (see C). In addition, parallel cortical microtubules provide the general channels for the membrane flow. Actin microfilaments are found perpendicular to the cortical microtubules and may be the source of motion to propel the directional motions of the fluid membrane. (Unpublished micrograph, courtesy of Susette Mueller and R. Malcolm Brown, Jr.) (C) E fracture face of the plasma membrane of an actively elongating cell in the root of Zea mays showing three prominent tears of microfibrils back through the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane (mf tear). Note that the rip terminates at a hole where the microfibril is associated with the rosette TC. In this fracture face, only the globular regions of the tips are shown associated with the TCs (globules). Many other TCs which have not been torn through the plasma membrane are revealed, some in clusters. (Unpublished micrograph, courtesy of Susette Mueller and R. Malcolm Brown, Jr.) (D) Freeze fracture through the innermost layer of a growth wall from an elongating cell in the root of Zea mays. Note the change in pitch of the transverse walls, suggesting that during elongation, the general pitch of the direction of microfibril synthesis is gradually changing from transverse to longitudinal. (Unpublished micrograph, courtesy of Susette Mueller and R. Malcolm Brown, Jr.)
|
|
 |
CELLULOSE IS A POLYMORPHIC MOLECULE: THE MANY FORMS OF CELLULOSE DIFFER IN THEIR ARRANGEMENT OF GLUCAN CHAINS
|
|---|
Cellulose is composed of linear polymer chains of ß-1,4-linked
glucose residues. Depending on the source from which cellulose
is obtained, the physical properties such as the crystalline
state, degree of crystallinity, and molecular weight may be
highly variable. The crystalline state of cellulose is determined
by the arrangement of the glucan chains with respect to each
other in a unit cell. In nature, most cellulose is produced
as crystalline cellulose and is defined as cellulose I. The
glucan chains in cellulose I are parallel to each other and
are packed side by side to form microfibrils that in most plants
are 3 nm thick, but which reach widths of 20 nm in certain algae
(Jarvis, 2003

). Interestingly, the microfibrillar width in the
red alga
Erythrocladia subintegra has been shown to vary from
10 to 68 nm (Tsekos
et al., 1999

). Differing amounts of two
crystalline sub-allomorphs of cellulose I, namely I

and I
ß are found to occur in the cellulose obtained from natural sources
(Attala and VanderHart, 1984

). Cellulose I

and cellulose I
ß differ with respect to their crystal packing, molecular conformation
and hydrogen bonding and these differences may influence the
physical properties of the cellulose (Nishiyama
et al., 2003

).
Cellulose from some algae and bacteria is found to be I

rich,
while cellulose from cotton, wood, ramie and tunicates is I
ß rich (Sugiyama
et al., 1991

). Since a cellulose microfibril
may contain both types of cellulose, some of the physical properties
of cellulose fibres will be dependant on the ratio of these
two allomorphs. Cellulose I

is metastable and can be converted
to I
ß by annealing.
A few organisms produce crystalline cellulose II naturally, and this form also is produced by mutants of Acetobacter xylinum, a bacterium that normally produces cellulose I. The glucan chain arrangement in cellulose II is antiparallel, and this may take place as a result of chain folding during synthesis as demonstrated in A. xylinum (Kuga et al., 1993
). An additional hydrogen bond per glucose residue in cellulose II makes this allomorph as the most thermodynamically stable form. Apart from the crystalline states, cellulose also occurs in a non-crystalline state, and this form of cellulose has been observed to be present along with the cellulose I crystallites in cellulose microfibrils. A large number of crystalline forms of cellulose are obtained by physical and chemical treatments of cellulose post-synthesis. Many of these crystalline forms are characterized using physical techniques. A new form of derived cellulose referred to as nematic ordered cellulose (NOC) is obtained by specific drawing of glucan chains from water-swollen cellulose (Kondo et al., 2001
). The structure of NOC is highly ordered but not crystalline, and films obtained from this cellulose exhibit properties different from conventional cellulose films. In a majority of cases, cellulose modified after synthesis has properties not found in the native cellulose that is obtained from living organisms.
Although cellulose is one of the simplest known polysaccharides, non-enzymatic chemical synthesis of this polysaccharide has not been very successful. One can ascribe a large number of reasons for the difficulty in synthesizing cellulose chemically, including the difficulty in realizing regio- and stereo-control at each step of addition of a monosaccharide sub-unit (Kobayashi and Shoda, 1995
) as well as the insolubility and folding of ß-1,4-linked glucan chains with increasing degree of polymerization. However, in spite of the limitations just mentioned, chemical synthesis of cellulose II has been obtained in vitro using ß-cellobiosyl fluoride (a synthetic substrate) and a crude preparation of cellulases from various sources (Kobayashi et al., 1991
) and cellulose I from purified preparations (Lee et al., 1994
). The mechanism by which cellulases catalyse the synthesis of cellulose from ß-cellobiosyl fluoride in an organic solvent is not very well understood, but it does highlight the concept that an ordered assembly of catalytic sites is essential for the parallel orientation of the glucan chains during the crystallization into cellulose I. It is important to consider that in the ß-1,4-linked backbone in cellulose, every glucose residue is rotated or inverted 180° with respect to its neighbouring residue. This structure of the backbone implies that the repeating unit in the backbone is cellobiose as opposed to a glucose residue, and the glucan chain itself is relatively straight. Moreover, this aspect of the backbone structure has had a major influence in understanding the biosynthesis of cellulose, especially since the natural substrate is UDP-glucose and not cellobiose. In nature, synthesis of cellulose requires the enzyme cellulose synthase that uses UDP-glucose as the substrate. These two features of cellulose synthesis are now certain for all known organisms even though the mechanism by which cellulose is synthesized in different organisms is still being debated.
 |
THE CELLULOSE-SYNTHESIZING COMPLEX: AN ELEGANT NANOMACHINE
|
|---|
Living cells employ a sophisticated membrane complex for synthesis
of cellulose I microfibrils. Not unlike the DNA-replication
machinery in cells (Baker and Bell, 1998

), the cellulose-synthesizing
machinery may be composed of a number of proteins arranged in
a very specific manner. During DNA replication, proteins assemble
at the replication fork, and synthesis of two polynucleotide
chains takes place simultaneously. In cellulose synthesis, a
large number of glucan chains are synthesized simultaneously
from a large membrane-localized complex that has been visualized
by microscopy (Brown and Montezinos, 1976

; Mueller and Brown,
1980

; Itoh and Brown, 1984

; Tsekos and Reiss, 1992

). The association
of organized membrane complexes to one end of the cellulose
microfibril impression in freeze-fracture replicas suggested
that these complexes are the sites of synthesis of cellulose.
Unlike the DNA-synthesizing machinery, only a single component,
the cellulose synthase, has been identified in the cellulose-synthesizing
machinery (Kimura
et al., 1999

). In vascular plants, this complex
appears as a rosette with a six-fold symmetry
and a diameter of 2530 nm (Mueller and Brown, 1980

).
Structures analogous to the rosette (e.g. some form of linear
synthesizing complexes) have been observed in all cellulose-synthesizing
organisms and in general have been referred to as terminal complexes
(TCs) (Brown, 1985

; Tsekos, 1999

; Okuda, 2002

).
 |
THE ORGANIZATION OF THE TERMINAL COMPLEX DETERMINES THE DIMENSION OF THE CELLULOSE MICROFIBRIL
|
|---|
In general, TCs are observed as particle arrays by freeze-fracture
electron microscopy, and the arrangement of these particles
can be in the form of a solitary rosette (as observed in charophycean
green algae and land plants) or as linear row(s) of rosettes
(as in certain algae) (Kiermayer and Sleytr, 1979

; Giddings
et al., 1980

). A great variation is observed in organisms that
have linear TCs (Tsekos, 1999

). A single row of particles is
observed in prokaryotes (as in
A. xylinum), brown algae and
some red algae. Multiple rows are observed in the glaucophycean
algae (Willison and Brown, 1978

), some red algae (Tsekos and
Reiss, 1992

), chlorophycean and ulvophycean green algae (Itoh
and Brown, 1984

), the slime mold
Dictyostelium (Grimson
et al.,
1996

) and the tunicates (Kimura and Itoh, 1996

). Diagonal rows
of particles are observed in the xanthophycean algae such as
Vaucheria hamata (Mizuta and Brown, 1992

). Surveying all the
different cellulose-synthesizing organisms, it is clear that
the greatest TC diversity is observed in different groups of
algae. Based on a number of studies, a strong relationship is
observed between the TC structure and the dimensions of the
cellulose microfibril (Brown, 1996

; Tsekos, 1999

; Okuda
et al.,
2004

). The rosette TCs of land plants and some green algae synthesize
cellulose microfibrils 3·510 nm in thickness,
consisting of 3690 glucan chains (Herth, 1983

; Ha
et al., 1998

), while the large linear TCs of the green alga
Valonia macrophysa produces microfibrils of up to 1400 glucan chains
(Sugiyama
et al., 1985

).
 |
TERMINAL COMPLEXES MAY BE ASSEMBLED AT THE PLASMA MEMBRANE OR TRANSPORTED PREASSEMBLED VIA THE ERGOLGIVESICLE PATHWAY
|
|---|
The plasma membrane is the site of synthesis and assembly of
the cellulose microfibril. If the dimension of the cellulose
microfibril is determined by the arrangement of cellulose-synthesizing
sites in a TC, how and when are these sites organized on the
plasma membrane? Two major views for the assembly of TCs have
been proposed from ultrastructural studies. In the first case,
TCs are assembled prior to their insertion in the plasma membrane
and are obtained from Golgi-derived vesicles (Haigler and Brown,
1986

). Alternatively, TCs are assembled directly on the plasma
membrane from particulate precursors which are supplied by Golgi-derived
vesicles (Itoh and Brown, 1988

; Tsekos
et al., 1996

). More recently,
Okuda
et al. (2004)

observed TC-like structures in the membrane
of large, dense cytoplasmic vesicles that were distinct from
Golgi vesicles in the xanthophycean alga
Botrydiopsis intercedens.
These authors propose that groups of TC precursors, which consist
of diagonal rows of particles, are loaded in the plasma membrane
through the fusion of large, cytoplasmic vesicles in this alga.
Once present in the plasma membrane, the TC precursors adjust
the arrangement of diagonal rows of particles to form a functional
TC. Yet another possibility is that, although the arrangement
of sub-units in a TC may be determined by the interaction of
proteins in the TC, the TC structure may tighten and appears
to be much more distinct when it produces the cellulose microfibril.
A tight interaction is observed between the glucan chains and
cellulose synthases when cellulose is synthesized
in vitro,
and this interaction may very well exist
in vivo. As mentioned
earlier, the only component identified in a rosette TC from
plants is the cellulose synthase. Based on mutant and molecular
analysis, a model for assembly of distinct cellulose synthases
in the rosette TC of land plants has been proposed and this
will be discussed in a later section.
 |
GENES ENCODING CELLULOSE SYNTHASES IN PLANTS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED BY RANDOM SEQUENCING AND SEQUENCE COMPARISONS WITH BACTERIAL CELLULOSE SYNTHASE AND OTHER ß-GLYCOSYLTRANSFERASES
|
|---|
One of the most interesting features of cellulose biosynthesis
to be discovered in the past few years has been the identification
of a large number of genes that encode cellulose synthases with
possibly non-redundant functions in vascular plants. DNA sequences
encoding cellulose synthases in plants were first identified
following sequencing of random clones from a cotton fibre cDNA
library (Pear
et al., 1996

). Derived protein sequences of two
cDNA clones (
GhCesA1 and
GhCesA2) from this library showed similarity
to the amino acid sequence of bacterial cellulose synthase (Saxena
et al., 1990

; Wong
et al., 1990

) and the D,D,D,QXXRW motif found
to be conserved in processive ß-glycosyltransferases
(Saxena
et al., 1995

) was identified in these sequences. The
expression pattern of the
GhCesA1 gene in the developing cotton
fibre, and the ability to bind UDP-glucose by a region of the
protein synthesized in
Escherichia coli further confirmed that
the clones obtained encoded cellulose synthase (Pear
et al.,
1996

). Features of plant cellulose synthases, determined using
the DNA sequence of the cotton
GhCesA1 cDNA clone, revealed
that they were larger than the bacterial cellulose synthase
and contained regions that were not present in their bacterial
counterparts. Bacterial cellulose synthases are transmembrane
proteins that have a large globular region in which the conserved
ß-glycosyltransferases residues D,D,D, QXXRW are present.
The globular region is predicted to be present in the cytoplasm
with transmembrane segments present at the N-terminal and C-terminal
regions. The cotton cellulose synthase was shown to have a similar
arrangement of the globular and transmembrane regions, but containing
a zinc-binding domain at the N-terminus and variable regions
within the globular region. Genetic identification of cellulose
synthase genes in vascular plants came about following the analysis
of the
rsw1 conditional mutant in arabidopsis (Arioli
et al.,
1998

). This mutant exhibits a normal phenotype when grown at
21°C, but shows swelling of roots and stunted growth at
31°C. Furthermore it produces reduced amounts of crystalline
cellulose at the non-permissive temperature but increased amounts
of a product characterized as non-crystalline cellulose. Using
positional cloning, the mutation in the
rsw1 mutant was found
to be within a gene (
rsw1/AtCesA1) that encoded a protein similar
to the cotton cellulose synthase. Moreover, the mutation in
the
rsw1 mutant was corrected upon transfer of a wild-type
rsw1 gene, confirming that the mutant phenotype resulted from a mutation
in the
rsw1 gene. Characterization of a number of other mutants
led to the identification of a number of other genes encoding
cellulose synthases in arabidopsis. The genome sequence of arabidopsis
has now made it possible to obtain information on the complete
set of cellulose synthases in this plant. In arabidopsis and
maize, at least ten distinct
CesA genes have been identified
(Holland
et al., 2000

; Richmond and Somerville, 2000

). Genes
encoding cellulose synthase (
CesA) and cellulose synthase-like
(
Csl) proteins have now been identified in almost 170 species
of plants (
http://cellwall.stanford.edu; see also
http://128.83.195.51/cen/library/tree/default.htm).
 |
ASSEMBLY OF A CELLULOSE MICROFIBRIL IN VASCULAR PLANTS REQUIRES ASSEMBLY OF THREE DIFFERENT CELLULOSE SYNTHASES IN THE ROSETTE TC
|
|---|
A number of arabidopsis mutants altered in their growth and
development have been characterized, and changes in some of
them are related to the decreased amount of cellulose produced
in these mutants (see Robert
et al., 2004

). In these strains,
mutations are observed in genes predicted to have a role in
cellulose biosynthesis, including those that encode cellulose
synthase. Gene expression of
CesA genes in different tissues,
developmental stages and under different environmental conditions
has been analysed in a number of plants including arabidopsis
(Hamann
et al., 2004

), maize (Appenzeller
et al., 2004

) and
hybrid aspen (Djerbi
et al., 2004

). In most cases, no significant
differences have been observed in the expression of the different
CesA genes in different tissues. However, different groups of
genes are co-expressed in cells that synthesize cellulose in
the primary cell wall versus those that are active in the synthesis
of cellulose in the secondary cell wall. A relationship between
these genes has also been obtained from mutant analysis as well
as phylogenetic analysis. In arabidopsis,
AtCesA1,
AtCesA3 and
AtCesA6 are proposed to be required for primary cell wall cellulose
synthesis (Fagard
et al., 2000

; Scheible
et al., 2001

; Burn
et al., 2002

) and
AtCesA4,
AtCesA7 and
AtCesA8 are proposed
to be required for secondary cell wall cellulose synthesis (Taylor
et al., 2003

). Similar sets of genes have also been identified
in other plants (Tanaka
et al., 2003

). These observations have
led to the suggestion that three different
CesA gene products
may be required for the formation of a functional rosette TC
in plants (Doblin
et al., 2002

). Although the three different
CesA gene products encode cellulose synthase, they are non-redundant.
A mutation in any one results in the loss of cellulose microfibril
formation. Hypothetical models showing the arrangement of the
different
CesA sub-units have been proposed, but as yet there
is no experimental evidence as to how the different
CesA sub-units
are arranged in the rosette TC (Perrin, 2001

). Rosettes associated
with cellulose microfibrils have a six-fold symmetry and each
particle in the rosette is believed to contain six
CesA sub-units
allowing for an assembly of 36
CesA sub-units in a rosette.
The number of
CesA sub-units in a rosette is predicted from
the number of glucan chains present in a cellulose microfibril.
Interaction between the three cellulose synthases (AtCesA4,
AtCesA7 and AtCesA8) that are required for cellulose synthesis
in the secondary cell wall has been demonstrated (Taylor
et al., 2003

). Moreover, the interaction between the different
cellulose synthase sub-units to give rise to a multimeric rosette
structure has been suggested to take place via intermolecular
disulfide bridges formed in the N-terminal zinc finger regions
of cellulose synthases (Kurek
et al., 2002

). At this point it
is important to consider that only a part of the rosette structure
is exposed to the extracellular side of the plasma membrane
with a significantly larger proportion of this complex being
present in the cytoplasm (Kudlicka
et al., 1987

).
 |
THE ROSETTE STRUCTURE REVISITED
|
|---|
Since the discovery of the rosette TC in vascular plants (Mueller
and Brown, 1980

), the concept of this multi-enzyme complex has
centred upon the freeze fracture image of a six-fold symmetry
of particle sub-unit found on the P fracture face of the plasma
membrane. It was only later from sectioned material that the
cross-section of a linear TC (Kudlicka
et al., 1987

) indicated
that most of the structure was deeply embedded in the cytoplasm
of the cell (
Fig. 2B). As a result, it became clear that the
linear or rosette TC morphology is based only
on a small fraction of the structural unit, and this view has
been supported by the purification of an intact rosette TC and
its activation to synthesize cellulose I microfibril
in vitro (
Fig. 2A; W. Laosinchai and R. M. Brown, Jr, unpubl. res.).
This evidence, as well as that obtained from recent molecular,
biochemical and structural data, provides impetus for the current
model of the rosette TC to be revised. The revised model of
the rosette takes into consideration two levels of assembly
of the cellulose synthases (
Fig. 3). In the first level, assembly
and processing of three different homodimers (each dimer being
composed of a unique cellulose synthase) occurs to form a linear
array with six particles, presumably deep within the cytoplasmic
base of the TC structure. In the next level, the linear arrays
are arranged in a rosette with a six-fold symmetry. The assembly
and processing of the linear arrays and their assembly into
the complete rosette TC complex presumably occurs in the endoplasmic
reticulum and the Golgi apparatus. The assembled rosette TC
is then transported to the plasma membrane for activation and
cellulose microfibril synthesis. In the revised model, the linear
rows within each rosette allow formation of glucan sheets by
van der Waals forces. This has been experimentally confirmed
from studies of cellulose biosynthesis in
A. xylinum (Cousins
and Brown, 1995

, 1997
a
,
b
). Formation of monomolecular glucan
sheets is the first of two steps in cellulose crystallization.
In the next stage, six separate glucan chain sheets are directed
into the exit channel of the TC complex, where they pass through
the rosette aperture and are then hydrogen-bonded into the crystalline
cellulose I microfibril. While not fully understood, this model
is very attractive in that it seems to explain all of the available
evidence thus far discovered, from understanding the requirement
for more than a single
CesA gene product for cellulose I microfibril
assembly to the two-step crystallization model. In the absence
of any one specific
CesA gene product, assembly of the rosette
would be affected. At the same time, a mutant
CesA may be incorporated
in the rosette but would not allow synthesis of cellulose I
microfibrils.

View larger version (210K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2. (A) Negative staining of immunity-purified cellulose synthase from Gossypium hirsutum showing synthesis of cellulose I microfibrils in vitro. The identity of the isolated components of the rosette TC is demonstrated by immunolabelling using antibodies to CesA that are coupled with colloidal gold. The TC complex (tc) attached to a cellulose I microfibril is labelled with the antibody. When cellulose synthases are isolated using specific detergents and purified by immunoaffinity methods, they remain sufficiently intact to synthesize microfibrils (mf) as they would in vivo. This unpublished micrograph, courtesy of Walairat Laosinchai and R. Malcolm Brown, Jr, shows that the TC structure at the business end is very different from the classical view of a rosette with a six-fold symmetry. (B) Ultrathin section through the plasma membrane of Boergesenia forbesii which has characteristic linear TCs, each with three rows of TC sub-units (see Kudlicka et al., 1987 ). In thin sections, these linear TCs can be observed in cross-section (tc), revealing structures never revealed by freeze fracture. In this case, a very large cytoplasmic component is imaged just beneath the plasma membrane (pm), and this proves that the typical TC structures revealed by freeze fractures show only the tip of the iceberg. These observations are consistent with the isolated functional TCs from Gossypium hirsutum (A) and form the basis for the revised model of TC structure/function (see Fig. 3). Note a single cortical microtubule (mt) adjacent to the plasma membrane and the cell wall (cw). (Unpublished micrograph, courtesy of Krystyna Kudlicka and R. Malcolm Brown, Jr.) (C) A multiple fracture through the cytoplasm and inner leaflet of the plasma membrane of an expanding cell in the root tip of Zea mays. This very unusual micrograph reveals the longitudinal fractures through cortical microtubules (mt) which parallel the underlying innermost layer of active microfibril synthesis. (Unpublished micrograph, courtesy of Susette Mueller and R. Malcolm Brown, Jr.) (D) Ultrathin section through the cell wall of the alga, Glaucocystis nostocherinum revealing the ordered arrangement of giant microfibrils (mf) synthesized by linear TCs. The alga synthesizes nearly pure cellulose I (Nishiyama et al., 2003 ). The microfibrils are synthesized in a complex helical pattern over the cell surface to reveal a precise rectangular shape. The microfibrils are coated with non-cellulose materials which stain well with a tannic acid post stain. These microfibrils are proposed to have more than 500 glucan chains per microfibril. While not identical to vascular plant cell walls, the Glaucocystis cell wall is perhaps one of the most beautiful examples to demonstrate the relationship between microfibril deposition and orientation to produce an ellipsoidal single cell. (Unpublished micrograph, courtesy of J. H. Martin Willison and R. Malcolm Brown, Jr.)
|
|

View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3. A revised model for the structure and function of the rosette TC in cellulose I microfibril biosynthesis. The 25-nm rosette portion of the TC (A) is shown in green where the six sub-units are largely localized to the innermost leaflet of the plasma membrane. The cytoplasmic portion of the TC is shown in yellow (B) and it contains the globular region of the catalytic sub-units. In this model, two identical sub-units of at least three different gene products form homodimers, all of which are required for cellulose I biosynthesis. Interestingly, the linear rows, each comprised of the three different cellulose synthases, are positioned such that the glucan chains produced by each sub-unit can rapidly associate by van der Waals interactions to produce the first stage of the crystalline cellulose product, namely a glucan chain sheet. Six separate glucan chain sheets are directed into the exit channel of the TC complex (B) where they pass through the rosette aperture and are then H-bonded into the crystalline cellulose I microfibril (C) that passes through this region to the surface of the cell. The face-on view of the cytoplasmic domain shows three different cellulose synthases, indicated as 1, 2 and 3, that are assembled as homodimers and organized in a linear row.
|
|
 |
IN VITRO CELLULOSE SYNTHESIS IS ESSENTIAL FOR UNDERSTANDING CELLULOSE SYNTHESIS IN VIVO
|
|---|
To determine the approximate, if not the precise, conditions
under which cellulose synthesis takes place in the cell it is
important to demonstrate cellulose synthesis
in vitro using
purified or partially purified cellular components. This is
not unlike any other cellular reaction being mimicked
in vitro;
however, demonstration of
in vitro synthesis of cellulose using
extracts from plants has been notoriously difficult. Numerous
reasons can be cited for the difficulties in determining cellulose
synthase activities from plant extracts, not the least of which
is the large amount of callose (ß-1,3-glucan) being
produced under most reaction conditions (Nakashima
et al., 2003

).
Other reasons for failure in determining synthesis of cellulose
in vitro from plant extracts could just be that the proper reaction
conditions have not yet been determined and the difficulty in
characterizing the
in vitro cellulose product. At this point
it has to be mentioned that
in vitro cellulose synthesis has
been routinely achieved using membrane preparations and detergent-solubilized
proteins (including partially pure preparations) from the bacterium
A. xylinum (Lin and Brown, 1989

). Whereas the cellulose produced
in vitro generally is obtained as cellulose II, cellulose I
microfibrils have also been observed under specific conditions.
Although
in vitro cellulose products using cell-free preparations
of
A. xylinum were described in 1958 (Glaser, 1958

), conditions
for obtaining high rates of cellulose synthesis
in vitro were
not defined until a much later date (Aloni
et al., 1982

). As
we now know, these conditions allowed the formation of the activator
c-di-GMP (Ross
et al., 1987

). By manipulating the use of detergents
and reaction conditions,
in vitro cellulose synthesis was demonstrated
using extracts from cotton fibres (Okuda
et al., 1993

; Kudlicka
et al., 1995

; Peng
et al., 2002

), mung bean (Kudlicka and Brown,
1997

), blackberry (Lai-Kee-Him
et al., 2002

) and cell suspension
cultures of hybrid aspen (Colombani
et al., 2004

). Although
callose still makes a large part of the
in vitro product, Kudlicka
and Brown (1997)

were able to separate the callose synthase
activity from cellulose synthase activity by native gel electrophoresis.
However, no conclusive evidence regarding the similarity or
differences between callose synthase activity and cellulose
synthase activity could be obtained by analyzing the polypeptide
composition in these two fractions. In certain cases, the cellulose
I microfibrils obtained
in vitro were shown to have dimensions
similar to microfibrils obtained from primary cell walls (Lai-Kee-Him
et al., 2002

), suggesting that synthesis of native cellulose
microfibrils can be mimicked
in vitro. Interestingly, the same
cellulose product (cellulose I) is obtained when cellobiosyl
fluoride and cellulase are used in an
in vitro reaction (Lee
et al., 1994

). As with
A. xylinum, no unique effector has so
far been identified for modulating
in vitro cellulose synthase
activity in vascular plants (Li and Brown, 1993

). Hopefully,
identification of this missing link would allow determination
of the optimal conditions under which cellulose synthesis occurs
not only
in vitro but also in plant cells.
 |
POLYMERIZATION AND CRYSTALLIZATION: LINKED STEPS IN THE ASSEMBLY OF CELLULOSE MICROFIBRILS
|
|---|
The parallel arrangement of glucan chains in the cellulose microfibril
requires that the newly synthesized glucan chains align with
each other and lock into a specific crystalline arrangement
(cellulose I), otherwise they would fold into the more thermodynamically
stable cellulose II or simply exist as non-crystalline cellulose.
The coordinated synthesis of a large number of glucan chains
(polymerization) from ordered sites present in the TC allows
these glucan chains to be positioned adjacent to each other
before crystallization occurs. Whereas polymerization of glucose
residues requires the enzyme cellulose synthase and the substrate
UDP-glucose, no proteins have been directly implicated in the
crystallization process in vascular plants. Indirectly, proteins
associated with the organization of the cellulose-synthesizing
sites and for the export of the glucan chains across the plasma
membrane probably play a role in the crystallization step. That
the cellulose synthases do affect crystallization in vascular
plants is clear from studies with the
rsw1 mutant in arabidopsis,
where there is an increase in the synthesis of non-crystalline
cellulose under non-permissive conditions (Arioli
et al., 1998

).
In bacteria, specifically
A. xylinum, other proteins (BcsC and
BcsD) encoded by genes in the cellulose-synthesizing operon
have been implicated in the assembly of the glucan chains and
thereby affect crystallization indirectly (Saxena
et al., 1994

).
Although crystallization occurs soon after the glucan chains
have been extruded from the cell, it does not occur instantaneously.
The glucan chains are able to bind to agents such as Calcofluor
(or Tinopal) and Congo Red after synthesis but before crystallization,
suggesting stages in the process of crystallization (Haigler
et al., 1980

). Based on their studies with
A. xylinum and incorporating
results from molecular modelling, Cousins and Brown (1997
a
,
b
) have proposed a two-step model for cellulose I crystallization.
In the first step, glucan chains assemble as a monomolecular
glucan chain sheet using van der Waals forces and, in the next
step, the glucan chain sheets assemble via hydrogen bonding
to form the crystalline cellulose I microfibril. Although polymerization
and crystallization are separate events, they are linked in
a manner where each event influences the other. Cellulose is
synthesized processively, and the growing end of the glucan
chain (the non-reducing end; Koyama
et al., 1997

) is tightly
associated with the catalytic region of cellulose synthase.
Polymerization and crystallization are coupled processes in
A. xylinum, and the rate of polymerization is influenced by
crystallization (Benziman
et al., 1980

). In
A. xylinum, Calcofluor
disrupts the crystallization steps by binding to the glucan
chain sheets, resulting in an increase in the rate of polymerization.
This relationship between polymerization and crystallization
may also be important for understanding increased production
of non-crystalline cellulose under non-permissive conditions
by the
rsw1 mutant of arabidopsis (Arioli
et al., 1998

) and
by cotton fibres in the presence of the herbicide CGA 325'615
(Peng
et al., 2001

). The forces generated by crystallization
may be sufficient to release the glucan chain from the cellulose
synthase active site during synthesis. Where crystallization
of the glucan chains is affected either by a mutation in the
cellulose synthase or in the presence of a herbicide such as
CGA 325'615, the glucan chains remain tightly attached to the
cellulose synthase. Both the mutation (
rsw1) and the herbicide
(CGA 325'615) result in a defect in the formation of a rosette
structure, probably at different steps in the assembly of the
rosette.
 |
ß-1,4-GLUCAN CHAINS ARE SYNTHESIZED BY CELLULOSE SYNTHASE
|
|---|
The polymerization of glucose residues into a ß-1,4-linked
backbone is catalysed by the enzyme cellulose synthase, which
utilizes UDP-

-glucose as the substrate. In its simplest form,
this is a one-step (or direct) polymerization reaction involving
glycosyl transfer by inversion of configuration at the anomeric
carbon. Moreover, in this type of reaction a single cellulose
synthase molecule is capable of initiating, elongating and terminating
a ß-1,4-linked glucan chain. This mechanism implies
that cellulose synthase binds directly to the substrate UDP-glucose
and is capable of initiating synthesis without the requirement
of a primer. Moreover, the enzyme is a processive enzyme and
remains attached to the growing end without the need to attach
and detach during synthesis. That cellulose synthase does indeed
perform a one-step polymerization reaction is observed
in vitro using cell-free extracts from
A. xylinum,
Agrobacterium tumefaciens,
and a number of plant species. Since cellulose synthase is an
integral membrane protein, in most cases these extracts are
either membrane preparations, detergent-solubilized fractions,
or partially purified proteins in solution or on a polyacrylamide
gel. In a majority of these cases, the cellulose synthase is
present with other proteins in the reaction mixture; however,
relatively pure preparations of cellulose synthase from
A. xylinum have also been used to demonstrate cellulose synthesis in a
one-step reaction
in vitro. Growth of the glucan chain in cellulose
occurs at the non-reducing end by direct transfer of glucose
from UDP-glucose (Koyama
et al., 1997

). Synthesis of ß-glycan
chains in a number of other polysaccharides, including chitin
and hyaluronan, also occurs by direct transfer of sugar from
a nucleotide sugar donor to the non-reducing end, and no requirement
for a primer has been observed. More recently, it has been observed
that hyaluronan synthase obtained from
Xenopus laevis extends
the hyaluronan chain from the non-reducing end while the enzyme
obtained from
Streptococcus pyogenes extends it from the reducing
end (Bodevin-Authelet
et al., 2005

).
 |
MULTIPLE STEPS IN POLYMERIZATION TO FORM ß-1,4-GLUCAN CHAINS OF CELLULOSE?
|
|---|
That cellulose may be synthesized in multiple steps (indirect
mechanism) was initially proposed by Matthysse
et al. (1995
a
)
based upon analysis of cellulose-minus mutants in
A. tumefaciens.
In this proposal, cellulose is synthesized through steps involving
lipid intermediates and both cellulose synthase and a cellulase
(an endoglucanase) is suggested to play a role in cellulose
biosynthesis. Interestingly, a gene encoding the endoglucanase
is present in the cellulose synthase-encoding operon in
A. tumefaciens (Matthysse
et al., 1995
b
) and a similar endoglucanase has now
been observed in cellulose-synthesizing operons in a number
of other bacterial species (Römling, 2002

). In
A. xylinum,
an endoglucanase coding region is not present within the cellulose-synthesizing
operon but is found adjacent to this operon, and the endoglucanase
is produced as a soluble protein (Standal
et al., 1994

).
In vitro cellulose synthesis clearly has been demonstrated using
membrane proteins from
A. xylinum and this rules out any role
for this endoglucanase during
in vitro synthesis. Whether this
or any other endoglucanase may have a role during
in vivo cellulose
biosynthesis in
A. xylinum remains to be determined. Membrane-anchored
endoglucanases have also been identified in plants (Brummell
et al., 1997

), and mutations in some of the cellulose-deficient
mutants of arabidopsis were mapped to a gene encoding a membrane-bound
endoglucanase, commonly referred to as KORRIGAN (Nicol
et al.,
1998

; Zuo
et al., 2000

; Lane
et al., 2001

; Sato
et al., 2001

).
For some time, the endoglucanases identified in bacteria and
plants were predicted to function as editor/chain terminator
during
in vivo cellulose biosynthesis (Delmer, 1999

) until Peng
et al. (2002)

proposed a model where the membrane-bound endoglucanase
KORRIGAN was implicated during cellulose biosynthesis in plants.
This multi-step model proposes that, in plants, sitosterol-ß-glucoside
(SG) serves as a primer for synthesis of sitosterol-cellodextrins
(SCDs) by cellulose synthase on the cytoplasmic side of the
plasma membrane. The SCDs are flipped by an unknown mechanism
to the outer side of the plasma membrane where the endoglucanase
KORRIGAN cleaves SCDs giving rise to SG and cellodextrins (CDs).
In the next step, the CDs undergo ß-1,4-glucan chain
elongation catalysed by cellulose synthase proteins. This model
envisages a lipid primer and a number of protein components
during cellulose biosynthesis. However, evidence from
in vitro cellulose synthesis using solubilized proteins from plant membranes
does not support the requirement of a primer or any lipid intermediates
during cellulose biosynthesis in plants (Okuda
et al., 1993

;
Kudlicka and Brown, 1997

; Lai-Kee-Him
et al., 2002

; Colombani
et al., 2004

; Somerville
et al., 2004

). More recently, no differences
were found in the amounts of SG and SCDs in extracts of wild-type
and a KORRIGAN mutant (
kor1-1) of arabidopsis suggesting that
the KORRIGAN endoglucanase is not involved in the recycling
of the SG primer (Robert
et al., 2004