AOBPreview originally published online on October 20, 2005
Annals of Botany 2005 96(7):1315-1320; doi:10.1093/aob/mci283
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
First Nuclear DNA C-values for 18 Eudicot Families
Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3DS, UK
* For correspondence. E-mail l.hanson{at}kew.org
Received: 1 June 2005 Returned for revision: 13 September 2005 Accepted: 16 September 2005 Published electronically: 20 October 2005
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTS AND DISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSLITERATURE CITED |
|---|
• Background and Aims A key target set at the second Plant Genome Size Workshop, held at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew in 2003, was to produce first DNA C-value data for an additional 1 % of angiosperm species, and, within this, to achieve 75 % familial coverage overall (up from approx. 50 %) by 2009. The present study targeted eudicot families for which representation in 2003 (42·5 %) was much lower than monocot (72·8 %) and basal angiosperm (69·0 %) families.
• Methods Flow cytometry or Feulgen microdensitometry were used to estimate nuclear DNA C-values, and chromosome counts were obtained where possible.
• Key Results First nuclear DNA C-values are reported for 20 angiosperm families, including 18 eudicots. This substantially increases familial representation to 55·2 % for angiosperms and 48·5 % for eudicots.
• Conclusions The importance of targeting specific plant families to improve familial nuclear DNA C-value representation is reconfirmed. International collaboration will be increasingly essential to locate and obtain material of unsampled plant families, if the target set by the second Plant Genome Size Workshop is to be met.
Key words: Angiosperm families, chromosome counts, DNA amounts, eudicots, genome size, nuclear DNA C-values
|
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTS AND DISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSLITERATURE CITED |
|---|
Swift (1950)
introduced the term ‘C-value’ (C standing for ‘constant’) to refer to the amount of DNA in the unreplicated haploid or gametic nucleus of an individual (see also Greilhuber et al., 2005). Nuclear DNA amounts (genome sizes) for species are used in a wide variety of biological fields (Bennett and Leitch, 2000). Genome size is highly variable, differing approx. 1000-fold between angiosperm species.
Since 1950, C-values have been published for >4100 angiosperm species (Bennett and Leitch, 2005a). With C-values for gymnosperms, bryophytes, pteridophytes and algae, these have been pooled into an electronic database and placed on the Internet (Bennett and Leitch, 2004). Since its launch in 1997, this database has received >60 000 hits, demonstrating the utility of such C-value data.
In 1997, the first Angiosperm Genome Size Workshop and Discussion Meeting held at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (RBG, Kew) identified major gaps in plant DNA C-value data and recommended targets and priorities to fill them by international collaboration. Two key goals were: (1) to estimate first C-values for a further 1 % of angiosperms (approx. 2500 species); and (2) to complete familial representation, by 2002.
A second Plant Genome Size Workshop and Discussion meeting (held at RBG, Kew in 2003) reviewed progress towards meeting the 1997 targets. Significant progress had been made, with at least 1700 first estimates for species being reported in 1998–2002. However, familial representation had only increased from approx. 30 % to approx. 50 % (Bennett and Leitch, 2005a). Moreover, within this, representation of eudicot families was low (43·1 %) compared with that of monocot (72·8 %) and basal (69·0 %) angiosperm families (Table 1). New and modified targets set for the next 5 years included to produce first C-values for an additional 1 % of angiosperm (2500) species and, within this, to achieve at least 75 % familial representation by 2009 (Bennett and Leitch, 2005b). With first data for 20 previously unrepresented families, including 18 eudicots, the present paper is a significant step towards achieving this aim, increasing angiosperm and eudicot familial representation to 55·2 and 48·5 %, respectively.
|
The sample is diverse, comprising plants from a wide geographical range with a variety of uses. Hamamelis virginiana (witch hazel) is cultivated as an ornamental and for the medicinal properties of its bark and leaves. Another species known for its medicinal properties is Salvadora persica (toothbrush tree). The Bedouin use the bristly fibres and vessels from beaten twigs as chewing sticks, the antiseptic properties of which reduce tooth decay and heal gums. Seed of Strychnos nux-vomica is the commercial source of strychnine, used for rodent control in Europe since the early 1800s. Corynocarpus laevigatus also has poisonous seeds, whereas Salvadora persica and Dillenia indica both have edible fruits (all facts taken from Mabberley, 1997
). Medusagyne oppositifolia—an endangered endemic from the Seychelles—is of high conservation importance. Once thought to be extinct, it was rediscovered in 1970 (Robertson et al., 1989). Other species in the sample inhabit highly specialized environments. Frankenia species can grow in saline environments, whereas Ecdeiocolea monostachya and Sarracenia flava grow on nutrient-poor soils. Leaves of the carnivorous species S. flava are modified to form pitchers that can trap insects. Thus, this highly diverse sample is interesting as a source of novel genome size data in previously unrepresented families, but also for providing useful information for several poorly represented groups, for example halophytes (as noted in Bennett and Leitch, 2005a). |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTS AND DISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSLITERATURE CITED |
|---|
Plant material
Table 2 lists 20 perennial species from different families not previously represented in the Plant DNA C-values Database, together with their geographic distribution, the source of the material studied in the current work and their identification status.
|
Growth of plants
Most of the plant material used in this study was taken from the Living Collections at RBG, Kew. Seeds of D. indica and Gnidia polystachya were germinated on 1 % agar in a Petri dish according to the temperatures and conditions outlined in the germination instructions provided. Fresh leaf material of E. monostachya was obtained from Kings Park and Botanic Garden (Perth, Australia). Seeds of Conostylis candicans were treated with Instant Smoke Plus Seed Primer (Kirstenbosch National Botanical Institute) prior to sowing on compost (Lloyd et al., 2000
).
Chromosome counts
Chromosome counts were obtained using a standard root tip squash technique. Young healthy root tips were taken from either freshly germinated seeds or potted plants, pre-treated in 2 mM 8-hydroxyquinoline for 4·5 h at 18 °C then fixed in a freshly prepared solution of 3 : 1 ethanol : glacial acetic acid. Hydrolysis time in 1 M HCl at 60 °C varied between 5 and 10 min depending on the toughness of the material. Photographs of metaphase cells were taken on a Zeiss photomicroscope III using Pan F film and are retained for reference purposes. Slides, made permanent using liquid nitrogen, are stored at RBG, Kew.
Estimating nuclear DNA C-values
Nuclear DNA C-values were estimated using either flow cytometry or Feulgen microdensitometry. The method used for each taxon is shown in Table 3 together with the calibration standard used. Several different standards were used to cover the range of C-values encountered. The standard used against each test species was determined empirically. The 4C-values used to convert arbitrary units into absolute values were taken from Bennett and Leitch (2005a), except for Solanum lycopersicum ‘Gardener’s Delight' (Lycopersicon esculentum Gardener's Delight) which was determined by Obermayer et al. (2002). [Phylogenetic analysis (e.g. Spooner et al., 1993) has revealed that Lycopersicon is embedded in Solanum, and thus the preferred name for L. esculentum is now S. lycopersicum.]
|
Flow cytometry
Young healthy leaf tissue collected from the calibration standard and the test species was co-chopped in 1 mL of isolation buffer (0·1 M citric acid, 0·5 % Triton X-100 in distilled water). Samples were filtered through 30 µm nylon mesh, treated with 50 µL of RNase (3 mg mL–1) and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min, after which each sample was briefly mixed before being divided equally into two tubes. The non-base-specific DNA stain propidium iodide (PI) was used for all samples. The staining solution comprised 11·36 g of Na2HPO4, 12 mL of PI stock (1 mg mL–1) and 20 mL of 10x stock (100 mM sodium citrate, 250 mM sodium sulfate) made up to 200 mL with double-distilled water. A 2 mL aliquot of the staining solution was added to each tube to give a final PI concentration of 50 µg mL–1 and incubated at 20–25 °C for 20 min. The addition of PI (pH approx. 9·5) to the isolation buffer (pH approx. 1·5) results in a final pH of approx. 7·5–8 (Obermayer and Greilhuber, 1999
). Samples were analysed on a Partec PA II flow cytometer with a 100 W high-pressure mercury lamp, a high-quality red-sensitive photomultiplier and a x40 gel objective. The linearity of the machine was checked on a regular basis using chicken red blood cells. When the coefficients of variation (CVs) were <3 %, three samples were made and each one was run three times (5000 nuclei per run). When the CVs were >3 %, more samples were prepared and run. Absolute 4C DNA C-values were calculated using the formula: (mean of the test sample peaks÷mean of the calibration standard peaks) x known 4C-value of calibration standard used.
Feulgen microdensitometry
Young healthy root tips collected from the calibration standard and test species from either newly germinated seeds or potted plants were processed and measured using a Vickers M85a microdensitometer as described in Hanson et al. (2001a).
|
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTS AND DISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSLITERATURE CITED |
|---|
Chromosome counts
Chromosome counts for the species are listed in Table 3. Original counts were obtained for 13 species. No count was obtained for Daphniphyllum pentandrum var. oldhamii or Medusagyne oppositifolia, and there are no previous counts published for these two species. A search through Fedorov (1969)
and the Indexes to Plant Chromosome Numbers published by the Missouri Botanical Garden (e.g. see Goldblatt and Johnson, 2003) revealed that this paper is the first to report new specific counts for Stachyurus praecox (2n = 24), G. polystachya (2n = 18) and Crinodendron patagua (2n = 16), and an approximate generic count for E. monostachya (2n = approx. 38). Counts obtained in this study agreed with previously published counts for Euptelea pleiosperma, H. virginiana, Staphylea bumalda, S. flava and Verbena rigida. Previously published counts for D. indica were 2n = 24, 28 and 54. We found 2n = approx. 52, which is similar to the highest previous report. Published counts for Basella rubra were 2n = 41 or 44, whereas we found 2n = approx. 48. A published count of 2n = 34 in Polygala calcarea is similar to the 2n = approx. 30 reported here.
Nuclear DNA amounts
Table 3 lists 4C nuclear DNA amounts in the 20 taxa studied. These varied approx. 14-fold, from 1·20 pg in C. patagua to 17·38 pg in S. flava (mean 4C-value of the whole sample = 3·94 pg). The sample comprises 18 eudicots (including the two species just mentioned) with a mean 4C DNA amount of 3·87 pg. This is much lower than the 4C mean of all known eudicot values which is 12·56 pg, based on 2350 values in the Plant DNA C-values Database (Bennett and Leitch, 2004). Similarly, first values for two monocot families listed in Table 3 (mean 4·59 pg) are also low compared with the 4C mean for monocots as a whole (41·88 pg) based on 1690 values in the Plant DNA C-values Database (Bennett and Leitch, 2004).
Although these new values extend taxonomic representation usefully (see below), they all fall towards the lower end of the ranges of values previously reported for eudicots (4C = 0·4–317·2 pg) and monocots (4C = 0·8–509·6 pg) and hence do not extend the known variation for this aspect of biological diversity. Moreover, more detailed comparisons show that while the data are all first values for families, in no case do they extend the range of genome sizes reported for any higher order group within the eudicots or monocots. Although C-values for 3126 species have been published since 1982, none extended the approx. 1000-fold range for angiosperms (Bennett and Leitch, 2005c). This suggests that the overall picture of genome size variation at these course levels is nearing completion.
Genome size in carnivorous plants
Sarracenia flava has the largest amount of DNA in the sample (4C = 17·38 pg), but it is also of interest as it is a carnivorous plant. Carnivorous plants generally inhabit nutrient-poor environments—such as wetland areas—where minerals are leached out of the soil. In order to survive these conditions, carnivorous plants have adapted to acquire essential minerals from insects. Sarracenia flava is a pitcher plant with modified leaves that attract insects. The insects become trapped in the liquid in the pitcher and the nutrients from the insect are absorbed by the plant.
A search of the Plant DNA C-values Database revealed that data exist for only 12 carnivorous species from seven families (see Hanson et al., 2001a, b). Estimates for 11 of the 12 species range from 4C = 0·76 to 3·8 pg, and are all defined as ‘very small’ (4C 
5·6 pg), but the twelfth estimate of Drosophyllum lusitanicum (4C = 60·00 pg) is defined as ‘large’ ( 4C = 
56·0–<140·0 pg) according to Leitch et al. (1998).
Drosophyllum was once included in the family Droseraceae, but has been placed in a separate family Drosophyllaceae on molecular grounds (Albert et al., 1992). Drosophyllum also grows in dry areas and has a well developed root structure, which enables it to acquire water and minerals more easily than Drosera which prefers wet habitats and has a poorly developed root system (Juniper et al., 1989).
Hanson et al. (2001a) speculated that plants growing in nutrient-poor environments might have small genome sizes by necessity. With the exception of Drosophyllum (see above), the 4C-value of diploid S. flava (17·38 pg) is over four times larger than the other C-values reported for carnivorous plants so far. Whereas this still falls in the bottom 3·5 % of the known range of 4C-values in angiosperms (0–509 pg), it is above the mode for angiosperms (4C = 2·4 pg). This adds to our knowledge of carnivorous plants, showing that small or very small DNA C-values are not always an essential adaptation to allow the survival of some plant types that grow in nutrient-poor environments.
Progress towards completing familial representation targets
The Angiosperm DNA C-value Database (release 5·0) comprises 4119 prime estimates from 217 families. Since 2001, a project at RBG, Kew has been carefully targeting plant families for which no C-value data have previously been published (see Hanson et al., 2001a, b, 2003; Leitch and Hanson, 2002), and data for >70 families have been obtained by this work. At the 2003 workshop, a target to estimate C-values for an additional 1 % for angiosperms (approx. 2500 species) was set, and within this to achieve 75 % familial coverage (up from approx. 50 %) by 2009 (for the full report, see http://www.rbgkew.org.uk/cval/workshopreport.html). Table 1 shows the cumulative progress towards the familial representation goal since 2001.
As noted previously (e.g. Hanson et al., 2001a, b, 2003), authorities can differ as to how many angiosperm families they recognize, ranging from 200 to 533 depending on the classification system used (see Brummitt, 1992). Moreover, the number of families recognized can also vary with time, as new families are created and previously recognized families are split or sunk on the basis of new data. Such changes clearly complicate the endeavour of tracking how many and what proportion of families are represented in the database (e.g. Hanson et al., 2003). This study follows the narrow APG (2003) circumscription, recognizing 453 families.
By continued careful targeting, the present work has usefully increased total angiosperm familial representation by >4 %, from 50·8 to 55·2 % (Table 1). Moreover, it has significantly increased the representation of eudicots, which hitherto lagged considerably behind that of other groups, by >5 % from 43·1 to 48·5 %. Given the increasing difficulty of locating and measuring material for unsampled families, as noted previously (Hanson et al., 2003), the present work is a significant step towards meeting the 5-year targets for familial representation set in 2003. Such difficulties, which already limit progress, will intensify as familial representation approaches 100 % in the future. Consequently, international collaboration to locate materials and estimate genome sizes for still unsampled families will be essential, if the long-term goals of 75 % and then complete familial representation are to be achieved.
|
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTS AND DISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSLITERATURE CITED |
|---|
We thank Kings Park and Botanic Garden (Perth, Australia) for donating leaf material of Ecdeiocolea monostachya and seeds of Conostylis candicans.
|
LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTS AND DISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSLITERATURE CITED |
|---|
-
Albert VA, Williams SE, Chase MW. 1992. Carnivorous plants: phylogeny and structural evolution. Science 257: 1491–1495.
APG. 2003. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group Classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 141: 399–436.[CrossRef]
Bennett MD, Leitch IJ. 2000. Variation in nuclear DNA amount (C-value) in monocots and its significance. In: Wilson KL, Morrison DA, eds. Monocots: systematics and evolution—Vol. 1 of Proceedings of the Second International Conference on the Comparative Biology of the Monocots, Sydney, September 1998. Melbourne: CSIRO, 137–146.
Bennett MD, Leitch IJ. 2004. Plant DNA C-values Database (release 3·0, Dec. 2004). http://www.rbgkew.org.uk/cval/homepage.html. (14 October, 2005).
Bennett MD, Leitch IJ. 2005a. Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms: progress, problems and prospects. Annals of Botany 95: 45–90.
Bennett MD, Leitch IJ. 2005b. Plant genome size research: a field in focus. Annals of Botany 95: 1–6.
Bennett MD, Leitch IJ. 2005c. Genome size evolution in plants. In: Gregory TR, ed. The evolution of the genome. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academic Press Publications, 89–162.
Brummitt R. 1992. Vascular plant families and genera. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
Fedorov A. 1969. Chromosome numbers of flowering plants. Leningrad: Nauka Publishers.
Goldblatt P, Johnson DE (eds). 2003. Index to plant chromosome numbers 1998–2000. Monographs in systematic botany from the Missouri Botanical Gardens, 94, 297, Missouri Botanical Garden Press.
Greilhuber J, Dole
el J, Lysák MA, Bennett MD. 2005. The origin, evolution and proposed stabilization of the terms ‘genome size’ and ‘C-value’ to describe nuclear DNA contents. Annals of Botany 95: 255–260.
Hanson L, McMahon KA, Johnson MAT, Bennett MD. 2001a. First nuclear DNA C-values for 25 angiosperm families. Annals of Botany 87: 251–258.
Hanson L, McMahon KA, Johnson MAT, Bennett MD. 2001b. First nuclear DNA C-values for another 25 angiosperm families. Annals of Botany 88: 851–858.
Hanson L, Brown RL, Boyd A, Johnson MAT, Bennett MD. 2003. First nuclear DNA C-values for 28 angiosperm genera. Annals of Botany 91: 31–38.
Juniper B, Robins R, Joel D. 1989. The carnivorous plants. London: Academic Press.
Leitch IJ, Chase M, Bennett MD. 1998. Phylogenetic analysis of DNA C-values provides evidence for a small ancestral genome size in flowering plants. Annals of Botany 82: 85–94.
Leitch IJ, Hanson L. 2002. DNA C-values in seven families fill phylogenetic gaps in the basal angiosperms. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 140: 175–179.[CrossRef]
Lloyd MV, Dixon KW, Sivasithamparam K. 2000. Comparative effects of different smoke treatments on germination of Australian native plants. Australian Journal of Ecology 25: 610–615.[CrossRef]
Mabberley DJ. 1997. The plant-book. A portable dictionary of the vascular plants. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Obermayer R, Greilhuber J. 1999. Genome size in Chinese soybean accessions—stable or variable? Annals of Botany 84: 259–262.
Obermayer R, Leitch IJ, Hanson L, Bennett MD. 2002. Nuclear DNA C-values in 30 species double the familial representation in pteridophytes. Annals of Botany 90: 209–217.
Robertson A, Wise R, White F. 1989. Medusagyne oppositifolia. Medusagynaceae. Kew Magazine 6: 166–171.
Spooner DM, Anderson GJ, Jansen RK. 1993. Chloroplast DNA evidence for the interrelationships of tomatoes, potatoes and pepinos (Solanaceae). American Journal of Botany 80: 676–688.[CrossRef]
Swift H. 1950. The constancy of desoxyribose nucleic acid in plant nuclei. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 36: 643–654.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  I. J. Leitch, L. Hanson, K. Y. Lim, A. Kovarik, M. W. Chase, J. J. Clarkson, and A. R. Leitch The Ups and Downs of Genome Size Evolution in Polyploid Species of Nicotiana (Solanaceae) Ann. Bot., April 1, 2008; 101(6): 805 - 814. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||