Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow FREE Full Text
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrowRequest Permissions

Spanish snapdragons in a shallow gene pool

I recently had a discussion with a colleague about the role of research in practical conservation. We agreed that it is important to know as much as possible about the biology, for example of threatened species, so that informed decisions may be made about appropriate measures in conservation. Thus, data on the genetic structure of populations can inform us about the origins of that population, the degree of variation within the population and the relatedness to other populations of the same species. This approach has been taken by Isabel Mateu-Andrés (Valencia, Spain, pp. 797–804) in a study of genetic variability (assessed by allozyme patterns for 10 different enzymes) in two rare and threatened Antirrhinum species: A. subbaeticum and A. peretgasii. A related but non-threatened species, A. pulverulentu, was included for comparison. For the two rare species, the author shows that genetic variabilities are ‘...the lowest known for the genus’, whereas in A. pulverulentum the variability is much greater. Further, for A. subbaeticum there is clear evidence for genetic isolation of different populations, with 85 % of the genetic diversity distributed among the different populations. Overall, these data conform to the widely acknowledged correlation between population size and the extent of genetic variability. But what has all this to do with practical conservation? Firstly, it shows that these threatened species, especially if individual populations become genetically isolated from each other, have higher incidences of inbreeding and genetic drift, leading to a lowered evolutionary potential. Secondly, the data indicate the need for a good germplasm bank for these species. Thirdly, the author suggests that for A. subbaeticum, with its high degree of diversity between populations, it is not a good idea to try to repopulate one region with plants or seeds from another. And, perhaps obviously, steps should be taken to protect the plants from those factors that pose the greatest threats.

Professor J. A. Bryant
University of Exeter, UK
j.a.bryant{at}exeter.ac.uk





This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow FREE Full Text
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrowRequest Permissions