Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow FREE Full Text
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrowRequest Permissions

l

Gender bending in a Mexican forest

Plant reproductive biology continues to provide fertile ground for good research. Take, for example, the phenomenon of distyly in hermaphrodite plants, the subject of the paper by González et al. (Veracruz, Mexico, pp. 371–378). In distylous plants, there are two floral morphs that differ in respect of style length. The authors point out that in several species this ensures outbreeding because fertilization can only occur between the two different morphs. There are also species that, despite being morphologically hermaphrodite, allocate resources to female function in one morph and male function in the other, although complete ‘functional dioeciousness’ is rare. The work described in this paper was focused on a distylous hummingbird-pollinated shrub, Palicourea padifolia. It grows in Central American cloud forests and, at least in the population under investigation, the two morphs are equally represented. Allocations to male and female function were studied in the same population over a 5-year period. In general, the long-styled (LS) plants produced more flowers per inflorescence, perhaps indicating a tendency to male function (more flowers being equated with greater pollinator attraction and the possibility of greater donation of pollen). This is consistent with the observation that hummingbirds transfer pollen from LS to short-styled (SS) plants. However, pollen flow in the other direction does occur (both morphs set fruit) and this may be mediated by insects. In terms of female function, the data are variable. In two of the study years, SS plants clearly invested more in female function than did LS plants. In two years there was no difference and, in one of the study years, the LS plants were ‘more female’ than the SS plants. Functional gender expression, as the authors term it, in wild populations of P. padifolia thus varies from year to year, throwing doubt on previous single-year studies. It will be interesting to know what causes this variation.

Professor J. A. Bryant
University of Exeter, UK
j.a.bryant{at}exeter.ac.uk





This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow FREE Full Text
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrowRequest Permissions