Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow FREE Full Text
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrowRequest Permissions

Leaving a nasty taste in the mouth—but perhaps not nasty enough

In the millions of years in which plants and insects have co-existed many different types of interaction have evolved. Many of these interactions involve some sort of mutual benefit. However, others are distinctly one-sided, such as attracting pollinators by deceit or insects using plants as food. In response to herbivory, many plants have evolved defence mechanisms including the synthesis of anti-feedant chemicals. On the other hand, many herbivorous insects have methods of dealing with anti-feedants and some even accumulate them as their own defence against predators. Here we focus on the work of Ruuhola and Yang (Turku, Finland, pp. 29–37) on the herbivory by larvae of the autumnal moth (Epirrita autumnata) of mountain birch (Betula pubescens subsp. czerepanovii) in Finland. Fourth-instar larvae were allowed to feed on leaves on trees in the wild and on branches in the laboratory; enzyme activities involved in plant defences were assayed. Feeding induced increases in activities of polyphenol oxidases and guaiacol peroxidase. Catalase activity, by contrast, decreased. In laboratory experiments, the most rapid response observed was the accumulation of the reactive oxygen species H22 around the wound site. This is thought by the authors to be involved in the induction of the oxidase and peroxidase activities. Overall, this looks like a classic anti-feedant response with the added dimension that H2O2 may inhibit the entry of opportunistic pathogens. However, there is more to this situation. Firstly, the larvae clearly have some ability to overcome the anti-feedant ‘environment’. Indeed, in years of heavy infestation, extensive defoliation and even death of trees occurs. Further, in more normal years there is evidence of induced resistance to herbivory occurring in the following season. This implies some sort of systemic response, perhaps mediated initially by the diffusion of H2O2. Investigation of this will surely be a fruitful topic for further research.

 

Professor J. A. Bryant
University of Exeter, UK
j.a.bryant{at}exeter.ac.uk





This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow FREE Full Text
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrowRequest Permissions