Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow FREE Full Text
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrowRequest Permissions

Getting a buzz from outbreeding

For the second time this month I am discussing mechanisms that prevent inbreeding in self-fertile species. The species in question here is Paraboea rufescens, a tropical Chinese member of the Gesneriaceae and studied by Jaing-Yun Gao et al. (Yunnan, PR China, pp. 371–376). The plant shows two fascinating floral characters. First, it is one of those species that possess mirror-image flowers (i.e. are enantiostylic); in this species the two forms (left-styled, anthers deflected to the right; right-styled, anthers deflected to the left) are borne within the same inflorescence. Secondly, it is buzz-pollinated: the visiting bumblebees rapidly vibrate their indirect flight muscles to induce pollen release from the tip of the anther. The authors have carried out a detailed study of flower morphology and pollination in this species. They showed first that pollination by hand was much more efficient than open-pollination, possibly suggesting sub-optimal numbers of pollinators. However, open-pollinated flowers, although yielding fewer fruit per inflorescence, produced more seeds per fruit. Whether this is related to resource allocation is not clear. Secondly, they confirmed that P. rufescens is self-fertile but that autonomous self-fertilization in the absence of pollinators does not occur. When flowers were self-pollinated by hand, there was clear evidence of inbreeding depression in respect of the number of seeds set. Outbreeding is therefore advantageous to this species. The relative positions of anthers and style within an individual flower actually make self-pollination within one flower very unlikely. Indeed, if the pollinator visits another flower of the same enantiomorph, pollen transfer remains very unlikely because pollen is present only on one side of the bee, the side away from the style. However, inbreeding is not completely eliminated in P. rufescens because both flower enantiomorphs are present in the same inflorescence. Because of the geometry, a bee moving from one enantiomorph to another may well effect a self-pollination.

 

Professor J. A. Bryant
University of Exeter, UK
j.a.bryant{at}exeter.ac.uk





This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow FREE Full Text
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrowRequest Permissions