Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow FREE Full Text
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrowRequest Permissions

Shining the light on shade responses in arabidopsis

One of the current buzz-words in biology is ‘systems’. Behind this term lies an approach that many of us have espoused for a long time. We may study molecular or cellular aspects of biology in isolation but there must be a realization that these events are integrated into regulatory and developmental networks that contribute to the life of the whole organism. This is nicely illustrated by the work of Cookson and Granier (Montpellier, France, pp. 443–452) on the development of rosette leaves in Arabidopsis thaliana (ecotype Landsberg erecta). Seedlings were kept in either fully lighted or shaded conditions with all other conditions being identical. The authors then compared the initiation, growth and development of the rosette leaves and the time to bolting under the two conditions. The effects of the shading were seen at several levels. First, leaves were initiated less frequently in shaded than in well-lit plants, an effect that goes right back to the dynamics of the apical meristem. Secondly, the phase of rosette leaf initiation was shorter and this was associated with the timing of the floral transition in the apical meristem, which occurred 3 days earlier in shaded than in fully illuminated plants. Further, those rosette leaves that were formed in shaded plants had significantly less area than those of the fully illuminated plants. This was caused by a reduction in the rates of both cell division and cell expansion, which were only partly compensated for by increases in duration of both these phases. These effects on rosette leaf number and on the area of individual rosette leaves also dramatically reduced carbon gain via photosynthesis, the absolute of rate of which was already reduced by the shade treatment. One wonders how much this factor contributed to the signalling network in this set of responses.

 

Professor J. A. Bryant
University of Exeter, UK
j.a.bryant{at}exeter.ac.uk





This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow FREE Full Text
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrowRequest Permissions