Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow FREE Full Text
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrowRequest Permissions

Early wake-up call elicits no response

Yam (Dioscorea rotundata) tubers are an important crop in several parts of the tropics and are grown in areas where the climate may permit more than one planting per year. However, the growth cycle of’the tuber itself prevents this, as described by Ile et al., Reading, UK and Ibadan, Nigeria (pp. 497–504). Depending on where the crop is grown, tubers are harvested either 180 days after planting (DAP) or 180–270 DAP (when the shoot becomes senescent). The authors point out that, in contrast to potato, harvested tubers do not possess any surface buds, nor indeed do they have any internal buds. They are therefore incapable of sprouting. However, there is a layer of meristematic cells under the surface of the tuber and it is in this layer that a ‘tuber germinating meristem’ differentiates, giving rise to the new shoot. The specific question addressed by the authors was whether it is possible to induce earlier formation of buds in the meristematic layer? The head region of each sampled tuber was cut longitudinally into portions and the portions were assigned to different treatments with plant growth regulators (PGRs): GA (two concentrations), 2-chloroethanol (two concentrations), thiourea and control. Typically, the tuber germinating meristem appeared approx. 290 DAP and the treatments with PGRs did not bring this forward. Indeed, with GA there was evidence for inhibition of development. This long first phase of dormancy is thus likely to be controlled by as yet unknown endogenous factors. However, once the tuber germinating meristem had appeared, PGRs did have an effect on the timing of the initiation of foliar primordia and the subsequent development of the shoot, with 2-chloroethanol being especially effective in acceleration of these later stages. The role of GA, however, remains unclear because of evidence that it may delay, by re-imposition of dormancy, the outgrowth of the shoot.

 

Professor J. A. Bryant
University of Exeter, UK
j.a.bryant{at}exeter.ac.uk





This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow FREE Full Text
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrowRequest Permissions