Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow FREE Full Text
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrowRequest Permissions

Lazy days of summer

The overall response of a plant to its environment is an integration of the different effects of different factors on different plant processes. This is very nicely illustrated by Poa bulbosa, the subject of the research of Ofir and Kigel, Rehovot, Israel (pp. 659–666). This grass, an inhabitant of the Mediterranean region, is summer dormant and exists as ecotypes with different drought tolerances. The plants exist in the dormant phase as bulbs formed at the base of tillers and new growth arises from these bulbs in autumn. The authors gathered plants from several sites along a rainfall gradient and grew them outdoors in a ‘net-house’. From this range four ecotypes were selected: a flowering ecotype from an arid site, a flowering and a non-flowering ecotype from a semi-arid site (non-flowering populations reproduce only via bulbs) and a non-flowering ecotype from a mesic site. In the net-house, the ecotypes maintained their normal flowering and dormancy behaviour (the more arid the site, the earlier was the entry into dormancy; non-flowering ecotypes entered dormancy later than flowering ecotypes). The plants were then grown under three different temperature regimes (16°/10°, 22°/16°, 28°/22°C), under long or short days, with or without pre-chilling. Here we concentrate on the effects of daylength and temperature. Short-day treatments promoted flowering and inhibited dormancy. Indeed, under short days, even non-flowering ecotypes were induced to flower, especially in the lowest temperature regime. In the flowering ecotypes, higher temperatures induced earlier flowering, but in all ecotypes fewer panicles were produced at higher temperatures such that even the flowering ecotypes produced very few flowers at 28°/22° C. Under long days, very few plants flowered and then only at the lower temperatures. By contrast, long-day treatments accelerated the onset of dormancy, which was further accelerated by higher temperatures with the actual timing of dormancy again varying with ecotype (as already seen in net-house-grown plants).

 

Professor J. A. Bryant
University of Exeter, UK
j.a.bryant{at}exeter.ac.uk





This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow FREE Full Text
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrowRequest Permissions