Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow FREE Full Text
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrowRequest Permissions

One-sided responses to local temperature changes

Which factor plays the major role in bringing perennials out of dormancy in the spring? Data obtained by Gričar et al. (Ljubljana, Slovenia and Hamburg, Germany, pp. 943–951) address this challenging question with respect to Picea abies (Norway spruce). About 30 days before the normal spring reactivation of cambial activity, they applied a heating coil to a length of mature stem, raising its surface temperature to 23–25 ēC. Within 10 days, the width of the cambium had increased from 4–5 layers of cells to 7–8 layers of cells, caused by divisions on the phloem side. There was also some differentiation of new phloem sieve cells. Within 20 days, new cambial divisions were also visible on the xylem side with some differentiation of early-wood tracheids. There was no evidence of vertical transmission of any signal; cambium above and below the heated zone remained dormant. The asymmetry of the cambial reactivation in the heated tree raises interesting questions about how it is brought about. Was this differential development across the cambium caused by the temperature gradient generated by the heating coil or was some other factor involved? At present, the answer remains uncertain. However, what is clear is that temperature is a major factor in this species in bringing about renewal of cambial growth overall. But what about the cessation of growth later in the year? The authors applied a cooling coil (9–11 ēC) to another tree at a time of high cambial activity in the summer. No effects of this were seen for 30 days. By this time, cambial activity was reduced and there were only five layers of cambial cells. Late-wood started to form, although there were fewer layers of this than would normally develop in control trees. Interestingly, in the 30 days of the experiment, cooling had no effect on the development of phloem, again indicating subtly different effects on the differentiation of xylem and phloem from the cambium.

Professor J. A. Bryant
University of Exeter, UK
j.a.bryant{at}exeter.ac.uk





This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow FREE Full Text
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrowRequest Permissions