Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow FREE Full Text
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrowRequest Permissions

The ups and downs of hormone treatment

Many of us will remember those simple student experiments on apical dormancy, using decapitated Phaseolus coccineus plants and blobs of lanolin paste containing auxin. We concluded that auxin derived from the apex and transported down the stem normally suppressed lateral shoot growth. However, we now know that it is more complicated; indeed, even now, there are details that remain to be elucidated, as so clearly presented by Morris Cline and Choonseok Oh (Columbus, OH, pp. 891–897). Firstly there have been suggestions that it is ABA, synthesized or released in response to auxin and transported acropetally (towards the apex), that inhibits lateral shoot growth. However, other authors have rejected this view and postulate instead that an as yet unidentified, carotenoid-derived inhibitor, transported acropetally, is the real inhibitor. The loss of apical dominance in mutants that lack carotenoid-cleaving dioxygenase is cited as further evidence for this view. The present authors have therefore carried out classical decapitation and hormone-replacement experiments with Ipomoea nil (morning glory), Solanum lycopersicum (tomato) and Helianthus annuus (sunflower). In all three species, auxin could replace the apical bud in inhibiting outgrowth of laterals, as in our classical experiments. Indeed, there was even some inhibition of lateral shoot growth if auxin was applied basally; this was particularly marked in S. lycopersicum. Apical application of ABA to decapitated shoots did not restore apical dominance but there was moderate inhibition of lateral shoot growth if ABA was applied basally in I. nil and S. lycopersicum. Indeed, in the former, the effects of basally applied ABA and apically applied auxin were additive. ABA therefore does indeed move acropetally but in these experiments can at most only partially replace the inhibitory effects of auxin. A role for a third player, the unknown carotenoid derivative, remains a viable possibility, in addition to which the variation between species is a feature of note.

 

Professor J. A. Bryant
University of Exeter, UK
j.a.bryant{at}exeter.ac.uk

 





This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow FREE Full Text
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrowRequest Permissions