Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow FREE Full Text
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrowRequest Permissions

l

Probing PIP patterns in

 

The importance of drought for crop productivity worldwide is again emphasized, this time in a paper by Aroca et al. (La Jolla, CA and Pisa, pp. 1301–1310), reporting an investigation of the effects of drought on water relations and on aquaporins in Phaseolus vulgaris. Aquaporins are proteinaceous pores in membranes that permit the diffusion of water across those membranes; PIP1 and PIP2 are classes of aquaporins located in the plasma membrane. From the authors’ extensive study we concentrate here mainly on the effects of drought. After 4 d of withholding water, the water potential of the rooting medium had dropped from _0.23 to _0.63 MPa. Leaf water status was unaffected but the transpiration rate was reduced by nearly 80 %. Re-watering the rooting medium restored its water potential and led to a return to control transpiration rates in the leaves. Drought also affected root hydraulic conductance (L), which was reduced to approx. 50 %of control values. Interestingly, in plants re-watered after drought, L remained at the value observed in droughted plants. Study of PIPs showed that drought led to increased expression of PIP2.1 (assayed by Northern blotting of mRNA) and increased levels of PIP1 and PIP2 proteins in leaves; levels of PIP proteins fell again after re-watering. In roots, droughted plants showed up-regulation of  PIP1.1, PIP1.2 and PIP2.1 (no other PIP genes were assayed) plus decreased levels of PIP2 protein (correlating with the decrease in L). Protein and mRNA returned to control levels after re-watering. Interestingly, drought treatment did not lead to an increase in ABA concentration in leaves or roots. However, topical application of ABA to well-watered plants had, in leaves, a similar effect to water deficit, but in roots, opposite effects: increased L, elevated levels of PIP1 and maintenance of PIP2 proteins. Paraphrasing the authors words, this is a very good start for analysis of how PIP genes are regulated by drought.

Professor J. A. Bryant
University of Exeter, UK
j.a.bryant{at}exeter.ac.uk

 





This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow FREE Full Text
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrowRequest Permissions