Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow FREE Full Text
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrowRequest Permissions

Poor competitors find refuge amongst specialists

 

Until recently I knew gypsum, CaSO4·2H2O, mainly as a component of some paints and as an insulating material in the building industry. It certainly does not appear to be a very promising substrate for plant growth. Thus, Palacio et al. (Xaragoza and Móstoles, Spain and St Paul, MN, USA, pp. 333–343) state that gypsum soils often form a hard surface crust that makes germination difficult; they tend to be mechanically unstable with unpredictable water relations, while their basic chemistry includes not only excesses of Ca and S, but also of Mg. Although these features may compromise plant survival, there are plants that grow and even thrive on gypsum soils. The authors suggest that these fall into two categories: gypsovags, gypsum-tolerant plants that find refuge in this stressful environment as a strategy for avoiding competition; and true gypsum specialists or gypsophiles that are more or less confined to gypsum soils. Based on their work in Spain, the authors subdivide the latter into regionally dominant species and narrowly distributed endemics. They have carried out a thorough chemical analysis, in relation to soil composition, of plants representing all three groups and have subjected the data to detailed statistical analyses. It is clear that in terms of chemical composition, regionally dominant gypsophiles differ from gypsovags. In particular, the former are able to accumulate nutrients that are scarce in gypsum soils, in addition to being tolerant of higher than normal concentrations of Ca and especially of S and Mg. Gypsovags, despite their ability to grow in these soils, do not show either of these features (implying incidentally that they possess mechanisms for excluding the more toxic elements). Intriguingly, the narrowly distributed gypsophiles are similar to the gypsovags. This work has thus provided significant information on a somewhat neglected aspect of plant biodiversity. This is important both for conservation of specialized floristic assemblages and for plant breeding, the latter in relation to growing crops on more marginal land.

 

Professor J. A. Bryant
University of Exeter, UK
j.a.bryant{at}exeter.ac.uk

 





This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow FREE Full Text
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrowRequest Permissions