Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow FREE Full Text
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrowRequest Permissions

Monkeyflowers

 

Working in a university department with a long-standing research interest in Mimulus, I noticed immediately the paper by Cooley et al. (Durham, USA and Santiago, Chile (pp. 641–650) who are interested in speciation mechanisms and reproductive isolation. In a recent paper (Hybridization as an invasion of the genome. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20: 229–237; 2005), Mallet states that at least 25 % of plant species, mostly younger in evolutionary terms, are involved in hybridization. How then do reproductive barriers actually arise? Cooley et al. carried out a very careful, well-designed and thorough study based on the possibility that pollinator preference plays a role in floral diversification. They worked on Chilean populations of four Mimulus (sub)-species, M. luteus luteus, M. l. variegatus, and M. naiandinus and M. cupreus. The latter has orange flowers rather than the classic yellow with variable red spotting of the ‘monkeyflower’. In the field, pollinator visits were studied for large numbers of plants. Laboratory-based observations included floral morphology, floral anthocyanins and nectar contents. The three yellow (sub)species were all visited almost exclusively by the same generalist pollinator, a bumble bee, Bombus dahlbomii, which made no overall distinction between flowers based on the amount of red anthocyanin pigment spots when species were growing separately. However, observations in an area where both M. l. luteus and M. naiandinus (and hybrids) grow revealed that individual pollinators had different preferences but, overall, there was a bias towards luteus-type flowers. Mimulus cupreus differs from the other three, both in overall plant morphology and in possessing orange flowers. It received very few pollinator visits and, indeed, it exhibits a high degree of selfing. Low pollinator visitation was not caused by discrimination against orange flowers: a rare yellow morph was equally neglected. The authors have thus shown that the appearance of red-pigmented flowers in ‘yellow monkeyflowerMimulus species has not led to changes in pollinators and that we need to know more about non-pollinator mechanisms in the generation of floral diversity.

 

 

Professor J. A. Bryant
University of Exeter, UK
j.a.bryant{at}exeter.ac.uk





This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow FREE Full Text
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrowRequest Permissions