AOBPreview originally published online on May 18, 2007
Annals of Botany 2007 100(3):621-630; doi:10.1093/aob/mcm076
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Are Petals Sterile Stamens or Bracts? The Origin and Evolution of Petals in the Core Eudicots
Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, 20A Inverleith Row, Edinburgh EH3 5LR, UK
* For correspondence. E-mail l.ronsedecraene{at}rbge.ac.uk
Received: 30 November 2006 Returned for revision: 8 January 2007 Accepted: 19 February 2007 Published electronically: 18 May 2007
Background: The aim of this paper is to discuss the controversial origins of petals from tepals or stamens and the links between the morphological expression of petals and floral organ identity genes in the core eudicots.
Scope: I challenge the widely held classical view that petals are morphologically derived from stamens in the core eudicots, and sepals from tepals or bracts. Morphological data suggest that tepal-derived petals have evolved independently in the major lineages of the core eudicots (i.e. asterids, Santalales and rosids) from Berberidopsis-like prototypes, and that staminodial petals have arisen only in few isolated cases where petals had been previously lost (Caryophyllales, Rosales). The clear correlation between continuous changes in petal morphology, and a scenario that indicates numerous duplications to have taken place in genes controlling floral organ development, can only be fully understood within a phylogenetic context. B-gene expression plays a fundamental role in the evolution of the petals by controlling petaloidy, but it does not clarify petal homology.
Conclusions: An increased synorganization of the flower in the core eudicots linked with the establishment of floral whorls restricts the petaloid gene expression to the second whorl, reducing the similarities of petals with tepals from which they were originally derived. An increased flower size linked with secondary polyandry or polycarpelly may lead to a breakdown of the restricted gene expression and a reversal to ancestral characteristics of perianth development. An altered ‘sliding boundary’ hypothesis is proposed for the core eudicots to explain shifts in petaloidy of the perianth and the event of staminodial petals. The repetitive changes of function in the perianth of the core eudicots are linked with shifts in petaloidy to the outer perianth whorl, or losses of petal or sepal whorls that can be secondarily compensated for by the inclusion of bracts in the flower. The origin and evolution of petals appears to be as complex on a molecular basis as it is from a morphological point of view.
Key words: Apetala 3, Berberidopsis, bract-derived petals, core eudicots, gene expression, perianth evolution, petaloidy, phylogeny, staminodial petals
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  Compiled by, F. Tooke, T. Chiurugwi, and N. Battey Flowering Newsletter bibliography for 2007 J. Exp. Bot., July 18, 2008; (2008) ern109v1. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. P. Scutt, G. Theissen, and C. Ferrandiz The Evolution of Plant Development: Past, Present and Future: Preface Ann. Bot., September 1, 2007; 100(3): 599 - 601. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Theissen and R. Melzer Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Origin and Diversification of the Angiosperm Flower Ann. Bot., September 1, 2007; 100(3): 603 - 619. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|