Skip Navigation

Annals of Botany 2008 101(9):NP; doi:10.1093/aob/mcn079
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Ann Bot
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bryant, J. A.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bryant, J. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bryant, J. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

John Bryant takes a closer look at some of this month's Original Articles

J. A. Bryant, Professor

University of Exeter, UK
E-mail j.a.bryant@exeter.ac.uk

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

The answer is blowing in the wind


Figure 1
Plants that colonize new and/or transient habitats may find themselves ‘out on their own’ with very few individuals of the same species in the vicinity. Opportunities for outbreeding are then very restricted and it is therefore not surprising that many colonizing and pioneer species are self-fertile. Indeed, so common is this correlation that it is often assumed that all such species are mainly inbreeders. However, it is dangerous to make unsupported assumptions of this kind, as nicely shown by Friedman and Barrett (Toronto, Canada, pp. 1303–1309) in respect of the North American annual Ambrosia artemisiifolia. The authors' experiments were models of efficiency and clarity. Firstly, they grew plants in arrays of differing densities. Planting density had some effect on the amount of pollen received: plants . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Salt stimulates Suaeda seeds

Attractive bodies energize ants

The proof of the postulate is in the eating


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in Ann Bot:

High Outcrossing in the Annual Colonizing Species Ambrosia artemisiifolia (Asteraceae)
Jannice Friedman and Spencer C. H. Barrett
Ann Bot 2008 101: 1303-1309. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Do Conditions During Dormancy Influence Germination of Suaeda maritima?
Anne M. Wetson, Carla Cassaniti, and Timothy J. Flowers
Ann Bot 2008 101: 1319-1327. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Anatomy, Ultrastructure and Chemical Composition of Food Bodies of Hovenia dulcis (Rhamnaceae)
Rafael Andrade Buono, Alaíde Braga de Oliveira, and Elder Antonio Sousa Paiva
Ann Bot 2008 101: 1341-1348. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Monocot Leaves are Eaten Less than Dicot Leaves in Tropical Lowland Rain Forests: Correlations with Toughness and Leaf Presentation
Peter J. Grubb, Robyn V. Jackson, Ignacio M. Barberis, Jennie N. Bee, David A. Coomes, Nathaniel J. Dominy, Marie Ann S. De La Fuente, Peter W. Lucas, Daniel J. Metcalfe, Jens-Christian Svenning, Ian M. Turner, and Orlando Vargas
Ann Bot 2008 101: 1379-1389. [Abstract] [Full Text]