AOBPreview originally published online on September 2, 2008
Annals of Botany 2008 102(5):723-734; doi:10.1093/aob/mcn154
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Variation of Pollinator Assemblages and Pollen Limitation in a Locally Specialized System: The Oil-producing Nierembergia linariifolia (Solanaceae)
Laboratorio de Biología Floral, IMBIV (CONICET-UNCba), Casilla de Correo 495, CP 5000, Córdoba, Argentina
* For correspondence. E-mail acosacov{at}efn.uncor.edu
Received: 18 April 2008 Returned for revision: 17 June 2008 Accepted: 14 July 2008 Published electronically: 2 September 2008
Background and Aims: Few studies have examined the dynamics of specialist plant–pollinator interactions at a geographical scale. This knowledge is crucial for a more general evolutionary and ecological understanding of specialized plant–pollinator systems. In the present study, variations in pollinator activity, assemblage composition and pollen limitation were explored in the oil-producing species Nierembergia linariifolia (Solanaceae).
Methods: Pollen limitation in fruit and seed production was analysed by supplementary hand pollination in five wild populations. Pollinator activity and identity were recorded while carrying out supplementary pollination to assess the effect of pollinators on the degree of pollen limitation. In two populations, pollen limitation was discriminated into quantitative and qualitative components by comparing supplementation and hand cross-pollination in fruit set and seed set. The effect of flower number per plant on the number of flowers pollinated per visitor per visit to a plant was examined in one of these populations as a possible cause of low-quality pollination by increasing geitonogamy.
Results and Conclusions: Although pollen limitation was evident along time and space, differences in magnitude were detected among populations and years that were greatly explained by pollinator activity, which was significantly different across populations. Floral display size had a significant effect on the visitation rate per flower. Limitation by quality clearly affected one population presumably due to a high proportion of geitonogamous pollen. The great inter-population variation in plant–pollinator interaction (both in pollinator assemblages composition and pollinator activity) and fitness consequences, suggests that this system should be viewed as a mosaic of locally selective processes and locally specialized interactions.
Key words: Nierembergia linariifolia, Centris, Chalepogenus, pollen limitation, pollen quality, oil-producing flowers, specialized pollination, floral display, assemblage composition, geographic variation, Solanaceae, tests of equivalence
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
Related articles in Ann Bot:
- ContentSnapshots
Ann Bot 2008 102: NP.[Extract] [Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  Compiled by, F. Tooke, T. Chiurugwi, and N. Battey Flowering Newsletter bibliography for 2008 J. Exp. Bot., June 23, 2009; (2009) erp154v1. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. O. Schlumpberger, A. A. Cocucci, M. More, A. N. Sersic, and R. A. Raguso Extreme variation in floral characters and its consequences for pollinator attraction among populations of an Andean cactus Ann. Bot., June 1, 2009; 103(9): 1489 - 1500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|